XRP ETF Race Heats Up: Why July 14, July 21, And July 25 Are Important

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-07-11Actualizado a 2025-07-12

Resumen

The XRP ETF conversation is no longer just speculation, and many industry participants and investors are on high alert. Interestingly,...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The XRP ETF conversation is no longer just speculation, and many industry participants and investors are on high alert. Interestingly, there are a string of important regulatory deadlines falling in July that might influence when and how an XRP ETF will hit the market. A recent post by Crypto Crusader Nick on the social media platform X draws attention to the significance of this month.

The post highlights the flurry of ETF activity and upcoming XRP fund filings. At the heart of the discussion are three major dates: July 14, July 21, and July 25, each marking the potential debut or decision deadline for different XRP futures and spot ETFs.

ProShares Leads XRP Futures ETF Push

ProShares is at the forefront with three XRP futures ETF proposals, all pending regulatory greenlights. Particularly, the ETF issuer is planning to launch three XRP futures ETFs, aiming for a July 14 debut, following an April postponement.

The products, the Ultra XRP ETF, UltraShort XRP ETF, and Short XRP ETF, had initially been postponed but are now back on track, as confirmed by the SEC’s acknowledgement of their filings. These ETFs are designed to give both long and inverse exposure to XRP price movements. 

Unless the SEC raises objections before the deadline, ProShares expects to move forward with all three ETFs on July 14. If approved on schedule, ProShares could set a precedent for futures-based XRP investment products in the United States, making this date the first critical checkpoint in the July ETF rush.

The second wave arrives on July 21, with two issuers entering the spotlight. Volatility Shares is preparing to launch its 2X XRP ETF, which aims to provide an amplified 2x exposure to XRP’s daily price movements. July 21 also marks the first listing and trade day for Volatility Shares’ standard XRP ETF. Simultaneously, Tuttle Capital is aiming to bring its 2X Long XRP Daily Target ETF to market. According to filings and updates, both firms have received SEC acknowledgment, with the necessary forms filed and effective for launch by the target date.

When Spot XRP ETFs?

Although the SEC has allowed several XRP futures-based ETFs to start trading, it has yet to approve any spot-based versions. The final and perhaps most critical date for XRP ETFs in July is on July 25, when the SEC is expected to decide on the REX-Osprey XRP ETF, which is a spot ETF, rather than a futures-based one. 

This is notable because a green light would mark one of the first Spot XRP ETFs approved in the US market. However, the first Spot XRT ETF could start trading this month unless the SEC steps in. That would represent a major shift in regulatory tone, especially given the SEC’s prior resistance to XRP’s legal status. Other major players such as Bitwise, 21Shares, and CoinShares are also in line with their spot XRP ETF filings, which could follow suit if the REX-Osprey decision sets a favorable precedent.

XRP
XRP trading at $2.58 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Reviewing 8 'Cash Cow' Projects in the Bear Market: The Leader Repurchased $283 Million Worth This Year

This article highlights eight cryptocurrency projects that have demonstrated strong cash-generating capabilities and implemented significant token buyback programs during the bear market of 2026. These projects, dubbed "cash cows," are repurchasing their own tokens, often reducing supply. According to data from Tokenomist, the projects with notable buyback activity from January 1st to June 30th are: Meteora (MET), Pump.fun (PUMP), GMX, Rollbit (RLB), Metaplex (MPLX), Hyperliquid (HYPE), Lighter (LIT), and Aave. Notably, MET's buybacks equaled 71% of its January token supply, while HYPE executed the largest buyback by value at $283 million. Key project summaries include: - **Hyperliquid (HYPE):** The leader by dollar value, its perpetual DEX protocol has repurchased and burned 44 million HYPE tokens (approx. 4.4% of supply) using a significant portion of trading fees, with total buybacks exceeding $1.1 billion since March 2025. - **Meteora (MET):** Its buyback of 336.2 million MET tokens had the greatest proportional impact on its circulating supply, equivalent to 71% of its supply at the start of the year. - **Pump.fun (PUMP):** The popular memecoin launchpad has cumulatively bought back over $400 million worth of PUMP since July 2025, using 50% of net revenue for buybacks and burns since April. - **Aave (AAVE):** Despite facing a major security incident earlier in the year, the lending protocol has continued its buyback program, repurchasing over 200,000 AAVE tokens. Its team is designing a new automated buyback mechanism. - **GMX, Lighter (LIT), Rollbit (RLB), and Metaplex (MPLX)** also have active buyback mechanisms funded by protocol fees or revenues. The article concludes that while token buybacks and burns do not guarantee price appreciation—as market conditions, news, and other factors play a role—these projects stand out for their ability to generate consistent cash flow in a challenging market environment.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Reviewing 8 'Cash Cow' Projects in the Bear Market: The Leader Repurchased $283 Million Worth This Year

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

Ethereum is back in focus with the announcement of the "Lean Ethereum" upgrade roadmap, described by Vitalik Buterin as Ethereum's third major update. This proposal aims to fundamentally redesign the consensus, data, and execution layers from first principles, striving to make Ethereum **simpler, more secure (quantum-resistant), more verifiable, and more scalable.** The announcement comes amidst a broader restructuring within the ecosystem, including a 20% staff reduction at the Ethereum Foundation and the emergence of new organizations like EthLabs. This has sparked a debate among Ethereum supporters ("E-bizens"). **Optimists** view Lean Ethereum as a critical refocusing on core protocol fundamentals: * **sassal.eth** calls it the ultimate bullish catalyst, envisioning a future where running a node is so lightweight it could be done on a smartwatch, greatly enhancing decentralization. * **Ryan Sean Adams** sees it as Ethereum moving from "narrative expansion" to "protocol hardening," addressing long-term foundational issues like security and scalability. * Analysts like **BITWU** and **蓝狐 (Blue Fox)** frame it as a third-phase evolution towards a "minimal, durable, and credible base layer" designed for the next decade. * **gigi发财猪** interprets the organizational changes as Ethereum "shedding old baggage and forming new teams" for a lighter, more agile approach. * **Xiyu** notes that the roadmap itself provides a much-needed new narrative for market sentiment recovery. **Cautious voices** acknowledge the vision but emphasize execution and market timing: * **Ignas** warns that while the roadmap addresses key community requests, it overlooks tokenomics, and competitors are gaining ground in areas like RWA. Timely delivery is crucial; delays could be bearish. * **Dankrad Feist**, a former Ethereum Foundation researcher, agrees on direction but criticizes the proposed 3-4 year timeline as too slow for the current market pace, especially with AI-aided development available. **In summary,** optimists believe Lean Ethereum reaffirms Ethereum's long-term value proposition as a decentralized world computer, while the cautious argue that its success hinges on faster delivery and tangible results to maintain market relevance. Despite ongoing criticism, the move signals Ethereum's effort to regroup and reclaim initiative at the protocol level.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

【AI Accessibility Gap Widens: Elite Tools Like Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming Privileged】 We are witnessing a growing "AI divide." A stark reality is emerging: a tiny fraction of elites, primarily in tech, are using powerful next-generation models like Fable 5 or the upcoming GPT-5.6, while the vast majority of the public only has access to "toys" - free, limited models equivalent to ChatGPT's basic versions (8B to 30B parameters). This creates a massive experiential chasm and cognitive dissonance. Industry outsiders see AI as overhyped and ineffective, unable to grasp its transformative potential, while insiders leverage these advanced models for a decisive competitive edge. The gap isn't just about model quality but product functionality. Free users get a simple chatbot. Paying elites get integrated workflow systems—capable of creating specialized agents, processing complex data, and handling real-world tasks like management, coding, and planning. Demos showcasing AI planning weddings or building apps feel disconnected from everyday needs like managing bills, groceries, or health. The cost barrier is immense, with reports of engineers spending $1000 daily on Fable 5 inference. Elite users employ sophisticated multi-model workflows, combining different AIs for ideation, architecture, execution, and review, completing complex projects in minutes instead of weeks. This divide extends to critical areas like healthcare, where free models are dangerously unreliable for medical queries. However, some argue that for 90% of common business tasks, mid-tier models like GPT-5.5 are sufficient; the perceived limitation often stems from poor integration and lack of context, not model intelligence. Ultimately, unequal access to cutting-edge AI is creating a new form of social stratification, where the most powerful tools are becoming the exclusive privilege of a few.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

In June, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest purchased $77 million worth of publicly traded crypto-related stocks, including Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish, during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years. This aligns with the investment thesis that such stocks offer a compliant way to gain exposure to the crypto cycle without directly holding Bitcoin. However, data analysis reveals significant drawbacks. A group of nine U.S.-listed crypto companies showed 30-day annualized realized volatility between 68% and 90%, nearly double Bitcoin's 37.6%. Over 90 days, Circle's volatility reached 103.6% versus Bitcoin's 37.8%. Drawdowns were also more severe for stocks like Circle (-51.4%) and MicroStrategy (-48.6%) compared to Bitcoin's -36.4% from its January high. Correlation analysis shows most stocks share only a moderate link to Bitcoin. For example, Circle, Robinhood, and Bullish have a 90-day correlation coefficient of just 0.55–0.58 with BTC, meaning only about one-third of their price movement is explained by Bitcoin's action. The rest stems from company-specific risks: earnings, competition, fundraising, and equity dilution. MicroStrategy (MSTR) is the notable exception, acting as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy with a beta of 1.59 and 0.85 correlation. Coinbase offers relatively balanced exposure. Circle exemplifies "crypto-wrapped" corporate risk, with its recent crash tied to stablecoin competition, not Bitcoin. Robinhood's diversified business insulates it from crypto downturns but also limits upside. Bitcoin miners like RIOT and MARA have posted significant gains year-to-date, driven primarily by their pivot to AI compute services, not Bitcoin's price. The article highlights that investing in crypto stocks often means accepting amplified volatility or layering on business-specific risks absent from direct Bitcoin ownership. For instance, MicroStrategy's recent challenges—its market value falling below its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV <1) and facing potential Bitcoin sales for liquidity—demonstrate equity-specific hazards like dilution and financing pressures not faced by a direct Bitcoin holder. ARK's buying spree represents a bet on a basket of different business models with varying crypto exposure, not a simple, lower-risk substitute for holding Bitcoin.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片