130亿元、200万受害者:起底稳定币「走资」第一大案「鑫慷嘉」

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2025-07-08Actualizado a 2025-07-08

Resumen

“我只是拿走了不符合你们智商的财富。”

原文作者:Fairy,ChainCatcher

原文编辑:TB,ChainCatcher

“同志们好!大家好!我是黄先生。我已经在国外了。每个人的智商与他们的财富是相匹配的。因为你们的财富与智商不相匹配,我要让你们匹配一下,我只是拿走了不属于符合你们智商的财富,希望你们能感谢我。感恩我。铭记这次的我赐给你们的教训。”

130亿元、200万受害者:起底稳定币「走资」第一大案「鑫慷嘉」

网传“鑫慷嘉”创办人留言图

这段猖狂至极的“告别语”,像一根淬毒的针,扎进 200 万“鑫慷嘉”受害者的心脏。

“鑫慷嘉”披着稳定币的外衣,打着迪拜交易所的旗号,自称联通迪拜资本、与中石油签署战略合作协议,借助“保本高息”的包装,诱使无数三四线城市的中老年人和个体经营户投入资金,最终坠入深渊。

如今,平台无法提现,主谋黄鑫已潜逃海外。在崩盘前两天,高达 18 亿枚 USDT 的巨额资金,被分作 12 批次,转移到了 3 个全新的加密地址。

从空壳到“军事化”传销,鑫慷嘉如何套牢百万受害者?

2021 年 3 月,黄鑫、邵馨慷、王彦嘉三人以各自姓名组合注册成立“贵州鑫慷嘉大数据服务有限公司”,注册资本 3000 万元,最初法人为邵馨慷,后变更为刘海亮。然而,该公司实缴资本为零,社保人数为零,属于典型的空壳公司。

但空壳很快镀上了金光。2023 年 5 月,鑫慷嘉以“中国石油”平台起盘, 9 月重命名为“DGCX 鑫慷嘉数据”,自称是“迪拜黄金与商品交易所”中国官方分部,还搬出“联通中东资本”“战略合作中石油”的噱头,宣称可日赚 2% ,引得无数投资者蜂拥而入。

130亿元、200万受害者:起底稳定币「走资」第一大案「鑫慷嘉」

会员下载“DGCX 鑫慷嘉数据”App 后,会跟随“老师”进行模拟操作,预测行情涨跌,表面上是交易,实则后台可随意操控涨跌数据。

此外,平台统一使用 USDT 作为入金和出金手段,内部计价也全部以 USDT 结算。所有会员需自行将人民币兑换成 USDT,再转入平台账户。

这场骗局还套着“军事化”传销架构。平台将全国划分为东、南、西、北四大"战区",推广人员按"司令-军长-师长"军衔晋升。拉 50 人升旅长、拿 15% 提成,拉 500 人送保时捷。其中最大的云南团队仅团员就有 15 万人,江西 10 万人,形成庞大传销网络。

130亿元、200万受害者:起底稳定币「走资」第一大案「鑫慷嘉」

实际上,早在 2024 年 10 月,四川珙县就发出风险预警,指出该平台无合法资质。但多数用户仍沉浸在“稳赚不赔”的暴利幻想中。直到湖南、湖北等 12 个省份接连亮起红灯,平台才开始露出马脚。

2025 年 5 月,平台提现手续费从 5% 飙升到 10% ,超 5 万元需"排队 30 个工作日"。6 月 26 日,平台全面关闭提现通道,系统瘫痪,数百万投资者资金被彻底冻结。

截至目前,全国多地警方已立案调查,已有 37 名团队头目落网,冻结涉案资金超 1.2 亿元。

黄鑫的假面与逃亡

“鑫慷嘉”幕后主谋黄鑫,曾对外包装为“华尔街金融博士”、“中石油高管”,并声称自己“早在 2015 年就准确预测原油暴涨”,试图营造专业、权威的金融人设。

然而,平台反复使用的“黄鑫”照片实为冒用他人肖像,图中人物实为香港博主“梁博士”,其本人早于 2024 年在社交平台发文澄清,称自己与此事无关。

130亿元、200万受害者:起底稳定币「走资」第一大案「鑫慷嘉」

网传黄鑫虚假个人简介

另有传言称,黄鑫早年就曾涉足传销项目。在十年前,他疑似参与了“云联惠”资本盘,担任华东地区推广负责人。该组织于 2018 年被广东警方定性为特大非法传销案件,涉案金额高达 3300 亿元,会员超过 500 万人,曾打着“消费返利”旗号疯狂扩张。

2024 年 10 月,预感“鑫慷嘉”骗局即将崩塌的黄鑫通过投资移民获得圣基茨护照,该护照让他享有 160 多个国家和地区的免签待遇。目前,其已潜逃海外,行踪成谜。

130亿元、200万受害者:起底稳定币「走资」第一大案「鑫慷嘉」

“鑫慷嘉”暴雷,留下了百万家庭的焦虑与伤痕。

这起案件是典型的“庞氏骗局 + 传销裂变 + 跨境洗钱”叠加的金融诈骗,但真正值得警惕的是它在手法上的“升级”:全面引入稳定币 USDT 作为资金进出通道,极大地提升了骗局的隐蔽性与跨境转移效率。

近期,无锡济南政府接连发文或转文探讨稳定币,香港《稳定币条例》即将落地。全球稳定币监管加速推进,然而踩着这股热潮的骗局,也在不断翻新剧本。

泡沫会换皮,但贪婪与信任始终是最容易被收割的筹码。

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片