Блокчейн и Web3-стартапы привлекли $1,15 млрд инвестиций в июне 2025 года

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2025-04-02Actualizado a 2025-07-02

Июнь 2025 года стал успешным месяцем для блокчейн- и Web3-стартапов: по данным Messari, за месяц было заключено 140 сделок на общую сумму $1,15 млрд, что на 3% больше по объему и на 9% по количеству сделок, чем в мае.

Самым заметным событием стала инвестиция в рынок предсказаний Kalshi, который привлек $185 млн при оценке в $2 млрд. Среди инвесторов — Paradigm, Sequoia Capital, Multicoin Capital и другие крупные фонды.

Еще одним крупным раундом стало привлечение $135 млн стартапом Digital Asset для развития институциональной блокчейн-сети Canton Network, предназначенной для токенизации реальных активов и интеграции с традиционными финансовыми институтами. Эти инвестиции подчеркивают растущий интерес к инфраструктурным решениям и новым финансовым продуктам на базе блокчейна, а также свидетельствуют о зрелости отрасли и ее способности привлекать крупный капитал4

Lecturas Relacionadas

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Hacker Leaks GTA6 and Launches a Token: Leaked Videos Become Ad Space for $CYBERLEEK, Must Buy Tokens to Vote for Next Clip

A hacker group called "CyberLeek" has leaked gameplay footage of the highly anticipated video game *GTA 6*, which is slated for release in 2026. Simultaneously, the group launched a meme token, $CYBERLEEK, on Solana. The leaks, which include maps and gameplay clips, are heavily watermarked with advertisements urging viewers to buy the token. Investigations of blockchain data reveal that the token was created and funded from a single wallet approximately eight hours before the first leak was released, suggesting a coordinated plan. The group has implemented a voting system where token holders can "vote" for the next type of content to be leaked by sending $CYBERLEEK tokens to a designated wallet—a process that permanently transfers the tokens to the hackers. This creates a self-sustaining cycle where interest in the leaks drives token purchases. Financially, the operation involved minimal upfront costs (less than $3,500 in out-of-pocket expenses) but generated significant revenue. On its first day, the token saw $15 million in trading volume, netting the creators an estimated $30,000 from transaction fees alone. While the group later burned a large portion of its developer-held tokens (worth over $1 million) to build trust, the fee-generating mechanism remains intact. The game's publisher, Take-Two Interactive, has initiated legal proceedings to identify the hackers. Despite this, the case demonstrates a new model where leaked intellectual property is used as leverage to promote and profit from a cryptocurrency, with meme token markets serving as an additional revenue stream.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Hacker Leaks GTA6 and Launches a Token: Leaked Videos Become Ad Space for $CYBERLEEK, Must Buy Tokens to Vote for Next Clip

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片