前 Framework 分析师下场创业,一文读懂无缝连接传统金融的链上支付设施 Fellow | CryptoSeed

链捕手Publicado a 2025-06-30Actualizado a 2025-06-30

作者:ChainCatcher

 

随着 Web3 技术不断发展并逐步渗透至日常金融场景,用户对高效、便捷、低门槛的链上支付方式的需求也愈发强烈。Fellow 正是在这一背景下诞生的链上支付基础设施项目,旨在通过即时结算与身份抽象机制,打通传统银行、数字支付与去中心化金融之间的通道,为用户提供极简化、高信任度的资金流动解决方案。

据官方信息显示,该项目通过创新性的“手机号即地址”设计,Fellow 使得加密支付的门槛显著降低,用户仅需手机号即可完成转账、收款等操作,无需复杂的钱包地址管理与链上交互知识。目前,该项目将在 iOS 上原生运行,并集成多种加密钱包与支付工具,致力于为 Web2 用户提供更为平滑的 Web3 迁移路径。

一、看懂实现即时结算的底层运行原理

Fellow 所构建的链上支付逻辑,以“即时支付”能力为核心优势,围绕以下两个维度构建起完整的技术闭环。首先是手机号地址绑定机制,用户在注册 Fellow 后,系统会将其手机号映射为链上地址,实现与传统支付方式的语义一致性,使 Web2 用户也能自然迁移到 Web3;然后是即时结算技术,Fellow 致力于提升链上交易体验,努力缩短交易确认时间,提升资金结算的效率和稳定性。该系统设计支持高频、小额的资金结算需求,旨在为用户提供更加流畅、快速的链上交易体验。

在当前多链生态逐步成熟、链上应用爆发式增长的时代背景下,支付体验成为用户能否真正迁移到链上的关键门槛之一。Fellow 通过“手机号即地址”的创新范式降低认知门槛,通过“即时结算”技术提升使用体验,精准解决当前链上转账过程中存在的慢、贵、易错问题。

Fellow 的市场策略以北美消费者和开发者群体为核心,旨在构建一个以开发者工具、用户习惯、平台集成为一体的“链上支付网络层”。其愿景是成为链上金融中不可或缺的基础设施拼图,对标 Stripe 在传统支付体系中的角色。

在未来,Fellow 有望拓展至更多国家和地区,并逐步与 L2 网络、AA 钱包等基础能力打通,进一步夯实“资金无边界流动”这一核心理念。

二、前 Framework Ventures 分析师出山,团队背景可观

Fellow 由 Josh Litchman 联合创办并担任 CEO。他此前曾担任 Pixels 生态系统总监,主导协议集成与产品生态建设。他曾是 FrameworkVentures 的分析师,深入研究链上基础设施、数字资产与新兴协议发展路径。他还曾在 Impatient Ventures 早期阶段参与建立数字资产业务,积累了丰富的一线加密市场经验。团队的另一核心成员则是 Fellow 的重要技术推动者,专注于链上身份与钱包交互设计,致力于优化用户体验和数据权限体系。

此外,Fellow 还获得 Coinbase 与 Privy 等安全基础设施提供方的支持,构建了一套高安全性、强隐私保护的身份交互框架,致力于为用户打造更加平滑、可信的“Web2 向 Web3”过渡路径。

三、结语

链上金融的真正普及,离不开稳定、高效、低门槛的支付路径。Fellow 正以即时支付为切入口,重新构想 Web3 时代的支付基础设施。其“手机号即账户”的设计,消除了用户对加密世界的陌生感;而快速、稳定的结算引擎,则让链上转账体验不输 Web2。随着开发工具的不断完善和生态合作的拓展,Fellow 正逐步搭建起一座联通现实世界与链上资产的桥梁。

Fellow 不是另一个钱包,而是一种新的支付方式 —— 快速、智能、面向未来。

(本文仅供参考,不构成投资建议)

Lecturas Relacionadas

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手Hace 56 min(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手Hace 56 min(s)

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

The article investigates Sam Altman's personal wealth strategy, centered around his investments in approximately 400 companies while serving as OpenAI's CEO. Despite not holding direct equity in OpenAI, Altman has built a vast portfolio, with at least 10 of his investments having commercial ties or ongoing negotiations with OpenAI. This creates a complex network of potential conflicts of interest, drawing scrutiny from U.S. congressional committees and state attorneys general. Key investments highlighted include the anti-aging startup Retro Biosciences (valued at $258 million for his stake as of late last year) and the chipmaker Cerebras, whose value soared following an OpenAI procurement deal. His most significant financial gain is linked to the nuclear fusion company Helion, where a recent funding round reportedly increased his stake's value to at least $4.1 billion. The article details a decade-long relationship between Altman, Helion, and OpenAI, including a controversial non-binding power purchase agreement and Altman's efforts to secure investments from OpenAI and its backer SoftBank for Helion. Other points include internal investigations at Tools for Humanity (developer of Worldcoin) and OpenAI's massive contracts with tech giants like Nvidia. According to Forbes, Altman's net worth is around $3.4 billion, ranking him 1251st globally—a rise of over 1400 places since 2024. OpenAI's board states that Altman's external dealings are transparent and potential conflicts are carefully managed.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片