加密早报：伊朗议会批准关闭霍尔木兹海峡，本周 BLAST、VENOM、SOON 等将迎来大额代币解锁

深潮Publicado a 2025-06-23Actualizado a 2025-06-23

德克萨斯州成为美国第三个建立比特币储备的州。

作者：深潮 TechFlow

昨日市场动态

市场消息：伊朗议会批准关闭霍尔木兹海峡

据金十数据报道，市场消息：伊朗议会批准关闭霍尔木兹海峡，但最高安全机构需要最终决定这一措施。

德克萨斯州成为美国第三个建立比特币储备的州

据The Block报道，德克萨斯州州长格雷格·阿博特于6月21日签署SB 21法案，正式批准建立全州战略比特币储备，使德克萨斯成为继亚利桑那州和新罕布什尔州之后，美国第三个设立此类储备的州。

该法案由州参议员查尔斯·施韦特纳提出，将由德克萨斯州主计长格伦·赫格尔管理，并独立于州财政库运作。德克萨斯区块链委员会主席预计，州政府将投入"数千万美元"购买比特币，尽管对德克萨斯这样规模的州而言，这一金额相对适中。

阿博特同时签署了HB 4488法案，确保比特币储备不受州财政定期资金清扫的影响，并保障其法律地位。

怀俄明州稳定币 WYST 计划于 8 月 20 日主网上线，将支持多条区块链

据 The Block 报道，怀俄明稳定币委员会在其最新月度会议上宣布，州政府支持的 WYST 稳定币计划于 8 月 20 日正式主网上线。该委员会尚未确定 WYST 将在哪些区块链上发布，但已列出 11 条候选链：Aptos、Arbitrum、Avalanche、Base、以太坊、Optimism、Polygon、Sei、Solana、Stellar 和 Sui。

WYST 是一种与美元挂钩的稳定币，由 2023 年《怀俄明稳定币法案》授权发行，是该州确立区块链领域领导地位的众多举措之一。据更新后的时间表，委员会计划将 WYST 智能合约迁移至指定的"候选"区块链，并通过"机构资金购买少量 WYST"进行生产环境测试，确保端到端流程正常运行，为计划与 8 月怀俄明区块链研讨会同期的公开发布做准备。

Reddit 正在洽谈采用 Sam Altman 的虹膜扫描 Orb 进行用户身份验证

据 Semafor 报道，知情人士透露，Reddit 正在洽谈采用 Sam Altman 的虹膜扫描 Orb 进行用户身份验证。

Pumpfun 代币拍卖与上线将再次延期

据吴说消息，原定于 6 月底举行的 Pumpfun 代币拍卖与上线活动将再次延期，目前预计是 7 月中旬。Pumpfun 此次代币拍卖的估值为 40 亿美金。Pumpfun 团队也在积极地向各种基金兜售代币额度。

韩国支付巨头 Kakao 宣布正式启动“韩元稳定币”业务

据首尔经济日报报道，韩国支付巨头 Kakao Pay 已正式启动韩元稳定币业务。该公司于 6 月 17 日向韩国专利局申请了 18 项商标权，这些商标将"KRW"(韩元符号)与代表 Kakao Pay 的"K"和"P"等字母组合，如"KRWKP"、"KWRP"和"KPKRW"等，这些商标被归类为虚拟资产金融交易、电子转账和中介业务等领域。

Kakao Pay 表示，虽然"尚未确定具体计划"，但这是"预先为稳定币业务注册商标权"。业内人士认为，Kakao Pay 此举是为抢占市场，特别是在韩国政界提出《数字资产基本法》的背景下，该法案将允许私营企业发行韩元稳定币。此外，游戏公司 Nexus 同日接受《首尔经济日报》采访时，透露了其成为首个韩元稳定币发行者的雄心。

LD Capital 创始人回应“高控盘 NEIRO”质疑：二级市场只买没卖

LD Capital 创始人 JackYi 在社交平台回应分析师关于“Trend Research疑似掌控着NEIRO（大写）代币总量的64.25%”的分析。

JackYi 表示，“二级市场真金白银只买没卖，纯属当时 MEME 火热，本想在它市值低位抄底，希望耐心能成为 ETH 生态龙头 MEME，越买越多成了币东。我想真金白银二级买入不算阴暗的事情吧？这个项目存在很久了。”

Coinbase 获得卢森堡 MiCA 许可证，可向全欧盟提供加密服务

据 Coinbase 官方公告，Coinbase 已从卢森堡金融业监管委员会（CSSF）获得《加密资产市场监管法案》（MiCA）许可证，这使该交易所能够向欧盟 27 个成员国的 4.5 亿人口提供全套加密货币产品和服务。

据公告称，Coinbase 将在卢森堡建立其欧洲加密中心，该国已通过四项与区块链相关的政策。过去几年，Coinbase 已在德国、法国、爱尔兰、意大利、荷兰和西班牙获得许可证，现在将这些业务统一在 MiCA 框架下。

ARK过去一周内总计抛售125万股Circle 股票，套现约2.43亿美元

据Cointelegraph报道，ARK Invest在Circle股票上涨近250%后继续抛售，周五出售60.9万股价值1.46亿美元的CRCL股票，一周内总计抛售125万股，套现约2.43亿美元。尽管如此，ARK仍保持第八大Circle持股方地位，持有价值7.5亿美元的股份。

Michael Saylor 再次发布 Tracker 信息，或将于下周披露 BTC 增持信息

Strategy 创始人兼执行总裁 Michael Saylor再次发布Tracker信息，或将于下周披露BTC增持信息。

根据此前规律，Strategy 总是在相关消息发布之后的第二天披露增持比特币信息。

本周 BLAST、VENOM、SOON、YGG 等将迎来大额代币解锁，总价值超 5000 万美元

Token Unlocks 数据显示，本周多个加密货币项目将迎来代币解锁，总价值超 5000 万美元。其中：

  • BLAST 将于 6 月 26 日解锁 105 亿枚代币，价值约 2160 万美元，占流通量 34.97%；

  • VENOM 将于 6 月 25 日解锁 5926 万枚代币，价值约 995 万美元，占流通量 2.84%；

  • SOON 将于 6 月 23 日解锁 4188 万枚代币，价值约 811 万美元，占流通量 22.41%；

  • ALT 将于 6 月 25 日解锁 2.401 亿枚代币，价值约 652 万美元，占流通量 6.83%；

  • UDS 将于 6 月 26 日解锁 215 万枚代币，价值约 231 万美元，占流通量 2.13%；

  • IOTA 将于 6 月 25 日解锁 1516 万枚代币，价值约 217 万美元，占流通量 0.39%；

  • VELO 将于 6 月 26 日解锁 1.828 亿枚代币，价值约 201 万美元，占流通量 2.47%；

  • YGG 将于 6 月 27 日解锁 1408 万枚代币，价值约 185 万美元，占流通量 2.68%；

  • FET 将于 6 月 28 日解锁 310 万枚代币，价值约 180 万美元，占流通量 0.12%；

  • AGIX 将于 6 月 28 日解锁 715 万枚代币，价值约 179 万美元，占流通量 2.38%；

  • EIGEN 将于 6 月 24 日解锁 129 万枚代币，价值约 130 万美元，占流通量 0.42%

行情动态

推荐阅读

麦刚：他改变了泡泡玛特和比特币

本文讨论了麦刚作为一位独特的投资人，不仅成就了潮玩巨头泡泡玛特，还在比特币和加密货币领域发挥了重要作用。他通过天使投资和个人影响力，连接了多个行业的关键人物，并推动了行业的变革与发展。

麦刚 2014 年演讲全文：模拟完美货币，比特币将成为大国博弈的新战场

本文围绕比特币的本质、特性及其在全球货币体系中的角色展开，分析了比特币如何模拟完美货币、其技术优势、去中心化特性，以及其在国际博弈中的潜在影响。文章还探讨了比特币作为一种新型货币形式的可能性及其对现有金融体系的挑战。

盘点美国 SEC 半年内人事调整，「新」SEC 真的加密更友好吗？

本文讲述了美国证券交易委员会（SEC）在2025年上半年经历了重大人事调整和政策转向，多位高管更替、超500人离职，并对核心部门进行重组。新任主席Paul Atkins采取更加友好的加密监管态度，推动创新并减少执法压力。此外，SEC通过圆桌会议和政策声明明确了质押行为的合规路径，加速了加密ETF审批进程，为加密市场提供了更清晰的监管方向。

美国州政府如何选择稳定币发行公链？

本文讨论了美国怀俄明州计划发行州级稳定币WYST，并通过公开评分机制选择适合的公链。这一评分体系基于核心指标、附加优势和风险扣分项，最终选出候选公链名单。文章还提到其他州及地区的稳定币计划，以及怀俄明州项目的技术细节和执行时间线。

合理估值 70 亿？PUMP 公售买到就是赚到？

本文主要分析了 Pump.fun 项目的估值、代币销售计划和市场影响。Messari 的研究报告预测其完全流通市值（FDV）可能达到 70 亿美元，但也强调了透明代币结构对市场信心的重要性。此外，文章提到 PumpSwap 平台在 Solana 生态中的市场份额增长，以及 Pump.fun 项目在未来收入和估值方面的潜力。

Lecturas Relacionadas

SPCX to Surge to $400? Can Options Propel SpaceX to Become the World's Most Valuable Company?

Summary: ZeroHedge posits that SPCX (SpaceX) options trading could trigger a gamma squeeze, potentially driving the share price to an extreme $400. This scenario is based on SPCX's unique post-IPO market structure: a low float, concentrated retail buying, and the imminent introduction of options. While the $400 price is speculative, the analysis highlights the potential for outsized volatility. The core mechanism involves heavy retail buying of out-of-the-money call options, forcing market makers to hedge by purchasing the stock, creating a potential feedback loop that accelerates price gains. Vanda data shows intense retail focus on SPCX specifically, not a broad market risk-on shift. Crucially, this potential volatility stems from short-term trading dynamics and structural factors, distinct from fundamental valuation drivers like those seen in NVDA. Whether the extreme $400 scenario materializes depends on actual options market data post-launch, including open interest in call options, implied volatility, and continued buying support in the underlying stock. The article cautions that while the conditions for heightened volatility are present, the predicted gamma squeeze is not guaranteed.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

SPCX to Surge to $400? Can Options Propel SpaceX to Become the World's Most Valuable Company?

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar BLAST

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Blast (BLAST) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Blast (BLAST) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Blast (BLAST)Después de comprar tu Blast (BLAST), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Blast (BLAST)Tradear fácilmente con Blast (BLAST) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

88 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar BLAST

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BLAST (BLAST).

活动图片