【关键突破在即】TRX剑指0.30美元,多头能否扭转乾坤?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-06-20Actualizado a 2025-06-20

Resumen

随着鲸鱼的积累和活动反弹,TRX 捍卫了 0.27 美元的支撑位。

  • 成本基础、趋势线和利润指标显示 TRX 仍处于看涨状态。
  • 鲸鱼活动、地址增长和重置情绪强化了中期积累论点。
  • 根据X(前身为 Twitter)上的 Glassnode 数据, TRON [TRX]继续在关键积累区间附近盘整,超过 140 亿 TRX 持有在 0.26 美元至 0.27 美元之间。

该区域代表成本基础热图上最强的支持集群,反映了长期定位的集中。

与此同时,截至发稿时,TRX 的价格 0.274 美元徘徊在该锚点上方,前方阻力较小。

随着市场接近这一门槛,鲸鱼曝光度的增加、稳定的地址活动以及情绪的复苏可能会影响 TRX 的短期走势。

TRX 能否维持趋势线上方的看涨轨迹?

TRX 继续保持自 3 月份以来的上升趋势线上方走势,维持其整体看涨结构。

尽管近期价格有所回落,但 0.27 美元至 0.28 美元之间的趋势线和斐波那契水平仍然保持完好。

此外,MACD 线开始穿过其信号线,暗示可能出现看涨势头回归。

该趋势线起到了动态支撑的作用,保持该趋势线对于未来交易日向 0.30 美元阻力区迈进至关重要。

大多数持有者仍保持盈利,从而降低了抛售压力风险

截至发稿时,IntoTheBlock 数据显示,所有 TRX 地址中有 75.11% 为“有钱”,总计 704.7 亿 TRX。

此外,13.66% 的钱包处于“价位”状态,正好位于关键的 0.267 美元至 0.275 美元范围内。

只有11.23%的持仓面临未实现亏损。这一分布表明,大多数持仓者并没有面临平仓压力。

在这种结构下,抛售压力可能保持最小,特别是当 TRX 保持在成本基础集群内或之上时。

鲸鱼和投资者积极增持TRX仓位

最新的历史集中度数据显示,鲸鱼持仓日均增长了9.59%。更为显著的是,长期投资者地址的持仓量激增了38.21%。

散户投资者持币量小幅增长4.10%,与机构投资者相比,活跃度有所下降。这一趋势凸显了大型机构投资者的谨慎增持。

如果这种趋势持续下去,一旦技术和宏观条件更加有利,它可能为更强劲的价格行动奠定基础。

新的地址增长指向扩大TRON网络实用性

过去一周,TRON 新钱包创建数量增加了 32.15%,活跃地址数量增加了 2.68%。

与此同时,零余额地址数量下降了10.52%,这意味着留存率和实际使用率有所提高。这一趋势反映了新用户的持续增长,并预示着基本面的改善。

地址基础的持续扩大,尤其是在投资者看涨行为的伴随下,通常预示着中期价格的强劲上涨。

最近的情绪飙升是看涨陷阱还是信号?

Santiment 的加权情绪数据显示,该指数急剧飙升至 7.5 以上,随后迅速回落至 -0.3。

这表明,欣快预期在调整之前迅速出现,这是盘整之前经常出现的一种模式。

尽管由于投机热情而导致市场人气飙升,但人气的降温可能已使市场重新回到更健康的轨道。

如果乐观情绪回归并与技术支撑保持一致,TRX 可能会重新获得动力,同时降低定位过热的风险。

TRON 继续在关键支撑位上方积聚力量,超过 75% 的持有者获利,鲸鱼持有量也在不断增加。新地址的创建和抛售压力的下降进一步增强了 TRON 的支撑位。

如果上升趋势线保持且情绪逐渐恢复,TRX 可能在未来几天上涨至 0.29 美元至 0.30 美元。

Criptos en tendencia

Lecturas Relacionadas

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

Glue Finance founder argues that Ethereum's current price underperformance, despite high on-chain activity, stems from its incomplete state and lingering dependency on central stewards like the Ethereum Foundation. The core thesis is that the market is discounting ETH not for lack of use, but because the protocol remains a "machine under construction." Key unresolved issues include centralized L2 sequencers with limited escape hatches, state bloat, vulnerable public mempools, and the looming quantum computing threat. This perpetual "work-in-progress" status forces reliance on a small group of maintainers, undermining the network's promise of credible neutrality and immutability. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed paths: a "wartime mode" of centralizing for speed (surrendering Ethereum's unique value) or merely replacing the Foundation with another governing entity. The only solution is to complete and then "freeze" the protocol's neutral core through a focused "Manhattan Project" dubbed "Lean Ethereum." This project aims to bundle critical upgrades—consensus layer overhaul, massive scaling via ZK-proofs, quantum resistance, and statelessness—into a decisive push to finalize the base layer. Once the core rules are cryptographically solidified and beyond anyone's control (passing the "walk-away test"), Ethereum would shed its dependency discount and earn a "rigidity premium" for its credible neutrality and programmability, potentially surpassing Bitcoin's valuation. The race is between completing this hardening and the risks of protocol capture or stagnation.

链捕手Hace 2 min(s)

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

链捕手Hace 2 min(s)

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar TRX

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar TRON (TRX) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar TRON (TRX) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu TRON (TRX)Después de comprar tu TRON (TRX), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear TRON (TRX)Tradear fácilmente con TRON (TRX) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

1.8k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar TRX

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de TRX (TRX).

活动图片