大摩解读「特马」开撕:马斯克精心设计,市场低估了他的能力

深潮Publicado a 2025-06-11Actualizado a 2025-06-11

后续会有很多交易机会。

撰文:龙玥,华尔街见闻

当全球首富与美国总统在社交媒体隔空交锋,资本市场嗅到了不寻常的信号。

据追风交易台消息,摩根士丹利最新报告揭露:这场看似突发的「特马之争」,实为马斯克为了实现特定目标和博得关注而精心设计的战略。他相信企业命运最终都与国家的整体财政实力紧密相关。而市场显然低估了马斯克的决心和承受负面冲击的能力。特斯拉股价下跌或只是暂时的「牺牲」。

这家华尔街巨头告诫投资者,如果马斯克与总统的分歧持续升级,特斯拉股价将面临更剧烈波动,但同时也将创造大量交易机会。分析师维持特斯拉为美国汽车板块「首选股」的判断,目标价 410 美元,看好其在物理 AI 领域的长期前景。

马斯克精心布局

在 6 月 10 日发布的报告中,摩根士丹利汽车团队罕见将马斯克的政治行动纳入特斯拉投资框架分析。

大摩分析师 Adam Jonas 指出,马斯克近期关于美国「双赤字」(预算赤字与债务)的言论绝非即兴发挥。上周的「特马之争」很可能是马斯克为了实现特定目标而精心计划的战略,旨在通过其影响力将相关议题置于公众关注的最前沿。

分析师解读称,美国的信贷前景和财政状况包括预算赤字、国债等问题,似乎已经上升为特斯拉 CEO 的头等优先事项。大摩认为,马斯克相信,无论特斯拉、SpaceX 等企业在个体层面多么成功,这些企业最终都与国家的整体财政实力紧密相关。

马斯克将美国主权信用比喻为「海上航船」,直指国家财政健康才是企业发展的终极锚点。

3000 亿美元的「弹药库」:被低估的影响力

摩根士丹利在报告中特别强调了一个被市场忽视的关键因素:马斯克拥有 3000 亿至 3500 亿美元的资产(包括公开和私人资产)。他用其极小部分的资产就能撬动国家政策讨论。大摩抛出一个问题称:

50 亿或 100 亿美元的资金能为马斯克认为重要的问题带来多少关注和支持?

这种财力雄厚的背景,让马斯克的每一次公开表态都具备了超越普通企业家的影响力和持续性。

分析师认为,历史正在告诉投资者,他们可能再次低估了马斯克的决心,以及其承受批评与财务损失的韧性。Jonas 在报告中提醒投资者回顾历史:

还记得几年前马斯克收购一家社交媒体公司(推特)时,市场集体的怀疑态度吗?还记得他开始明显将资源投入政治领域时的沮丧感吗?

据摩根士丹利分析,马斯克参与政治活动对特斯拉产品和品牌造成的负面冲击是一种短期「牺牲」,这对公司管理层来说不会是意外。

波动中的交易机会

大摩警告,若马斯克与特朗普的对立持续升级,特斯拉股票波动性将进一步放大,但剧烈波动也会催生「系列交易机会」。

值得注意的是,马斯克目前管理着 5 家公司(特斯拉、SpaceX、Boring、Neuralink、xAI),他控制着其中 4 家私人公司,但在唯一的上市公司特斯拉中仅持有 13% 的股份(不包括有争议的薪酬方案)。

摩根士丹利认为,特斯拉在制造、数据收集、机器人 / 物理 AI、能源、供应链和基础设施方面的专业知识,对于让美国在具身 AI 领域与他国保持同等竞争力比以往任何时候都更加重要。

维持「首选股」评级

尽管面临政治风险,摩根士丹利依然维持特斯拉为美国汽车板块「首选股」,目标价 410 美元(较 6 月 9 日收盘价 308.58 美元存在 33% 上行空间)。

该投行表示,其超配评级和价格目标基于对特斯拉在物理 AI 关键领域能力的信心,包括自动驾驶汽车、人形机器人和其他形态因子,涵盖数据、机器人、储能、计算、制造和太空 / 通信 / 网络 / 基础设施等领域。这些增长和利润机会远超传统电动汽车业务。

随着各项业务进一步扩张,摩根士丹利预期不同实体之间战略交叉合作的时机正在临近:Grok 进入汽车、SpaceX 装载 Cybertruck、Optimus 假肢用于 Neuralink 患者、xAI 在 Optimus 和 Cybercab 中训练等等,可能性十分丰富。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

DeepSeek has updated its DeepSeek V4 model with the DSpark speculative decoding framework, achieving a significant 60-85% speedup in generation for Flash models and 57-78% for Pro models while maintaining the same overall throughput. This engineering-focused update, rather than a core architectural change, introduces DSpark to address latency and throughput bottlenecks in high-concurrency production environments. DSpark combines high-throughput parallel generation with adaptive load-aware verification. Its key innovations include a semi-autoregressive generation architecture to model dependencies within token blocks and a hardware-aware confidence-scheduled verification system. This system uses a confidence head to predict token acceptance probabilities, allowing it to dynamically optimize verification length per request and allocate compute only to tokens with the highest expected payoff. The asynchronous scheduler is designed for real-world deployment, ensuring zero-overhead scheduling and continuous CUDA graph replay while preserving the target model's output distribution. In tests across mathematical reasoning, code generation, and daily dialogue, DSpark outperformed state-of-the-art models like Eagle3 and DFlash, increasing average acceptance length by 26.7%-30.9% and 16.3%-18.4% respectively on Qwen3 target models. DeepSeek also open-sourced DeepSpec, a full-stack codebase for training and evaluating speculative decoding draft models, providing a standardized toolkit that includes data preparation tools, model implementations, training code, and evaluation scripts.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stronger balance sheets. In essence, Bitcoin mining is transitioning from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." Future profitability and resilience will depend less on block rewards and more on diversified income sources like energy management and computational infrastructure services. For investors, the key question is not the halving itself, but which miners can successfully navigate this business model transformation.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片