Wall Street’s Next Crypto Play? US Banks Quietly Plan Joint Stablecoin Launch

BitcoinistPublicado a 2025-05-24Actualizado a 2025-05-26

Resumen

Major US financial institutions are reportedly in early talks to make another crypto play by creating a jointly issued stablecoin,...

Major US financial institutions are reportedly in early talks to make another crypto play by creating a jointly issued stablecoin, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report.


The project could mark a significant shift in how traditional banks approach digital assets, aligning their efforts with growing institutional and regulatory interest in blockchain-based finance.

Detailing the Joint Stablecoin Project


Wall Street Journal citing sources familiar with the discussions said that participants in the conversation include entities linked to JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and other leading banks.


So far, the initiative is still in its exploratory phase, with no official confirmation or final agreement announced. However, discussions reportedly center around a stablecoin model involving The Clearing House, a real-time payments consortium, and Early Warning Services, the fintech firm responsible for the widely used Zelle payment platform.


The proposed coin would likely be designed for use across participating banks, but one version of the plan would allow broader access to the crypto stablecoin by other institutions beyond the core group of issuers.

SPOILER ALERT: JP Morgan, BofA, Well Fargo, and Citi (the 4 largest US banks) getting together to announce a joint stablecoin is just a move in an overall strategy that will lead to Tether and USDC being acquired by these large banks.


The STABLE and GENIUS Acts construct…
— Aaron Day (@AaronRDay) May 23, 2025


Crypto Regulatory Shifts Encourage Stablecoin Development


The banking sector’s growing interest in stablecoins follows a broader regulatory push in the United States to bring clarity to the status and use of these digital instruments. The Senate recently advanced the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act, or the GENIUS Act, which seeks to implement a formal legal framework for the issuance and oversight of stablecoins.


The bill would require that stablecoins be fully backed by reserves such as US dollars or equivalent liquid assets, and mandate regular audits for issuers with large market capitalizations.

If passed, the GENIUS Act could become the first significant federal legislation on stablecoins in the United States. Provisions in the bill also address cross-border issuance and operational transparency, key issues that have long concerned both lawmakers and market participants.


The legislative momentum appears to be opening doors for traditional financial players, who have so far mostly remained on the sidelines of crypto asset innovation due to unclear or inconsistent regulations.

The idea of a bank-issued stablecoin is not entirely new. JPMorgan, one of the firms mentioned in the report, already operates JPM Coin for institutional clients, but a broader initiative involving multiple banks and a potentially public-facing token would represent a more expansive effort.


Meanwhile, smaller regional and community banks are also said to be evaluating the potential of forming a separate consortium focused on similar goals, reflecting widespread interest in blockchain settlement mechanisms.

The global crypto market cap valuation on TradingView

The global digital currency market cap valuation. | Source: TradingView.com Featured image created with DALL-E, Chart from TradingView

Lecturas Relacionadas

Crypto 美股观察:CRCL、HOOD、COIN 与 MSTR,最近在交易什么?

Recent weeks have seen significant developments for four key US-listed crypto-related stocks—Circle (CRCL), Robinhood (HOOD), Coinbase (COIN), and MicroStrategy (MSTR)—with their core investment theses diverging. For **Circle (CRCL)**, its stock price is increasingly realigning with the fundamental driver of **USDC circulation**. After IPO exuberance faded, CRCL's performance now correlates closely with changes in USDC supply, which is heavily influenced by DeFi activity and risk appetite. The recent contraction in USDC, linked to events like the KelpDAO incident, has pressured the stock. A sustainable recovery signal for CRCL would require a confluence of recovering DeFi TVL, stablecoin demand, and consecutive weeks of USDC net issuance. **Robinhood (HOOD)** gained market attention with the launch of its **Robinhood Chain**, an Ethereum L2. While not an immediate threat to Coinbase's dominant Base network in terms of scale or developer ecosystem, it represents a strategic encroachment. Robinhood's path—leveraging its traditional retail brokerage user base and assets to build a chain-based financial system—challenges Coinbase's narrative as the sole listed company integrating crypto-native infrastructure with traditional finance. This could dilute COIN's long-term scarcity premium. **MicroStrategy (MSTR)** made a notable shift by **selling Bitcoin** for the first time in a meaningful way (3,588 BTC), breaking its long-standing "buy-only" posture. The sales, used to fund dividends and replenish USD reserves, signal a move towards active capital management. While not indicative of a bearish turn on Bitcoin, it introduces new complexity for MSTR investors. The stock must now be evaluated not just as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy, but also considering fixed cash obligations from preferred dividends and debt, alongside its capital allocation strategy between holding BTC and maintaining liquidity. In summary, the investment narratives for these stocks are evolving beyond simple crypto market beta. Key variables now include stablecoin fundamentals, competition in chain-based financial ecosystems, and the balance between asset accumulation and corporate capital structure management.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Crypto 美股观察:CRCL、HOOD、COIN 与 MSTR,最近在交易什么?

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

Robinhood has launched "Robinhood Chain," an Ethereum-based Layer 2 built with Arbitrum technology, and introduced "Stock Tokens." This article clarifies that these tokens are not actual on-chain equity. They are tokenized debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets Jersey Limited, offering economic exposure to reference stocks or ETFs but lacking direct ownership, voting rights, or other shareholder privileges. The legal structure is conservative, relying on traditional financial intermediaries, custody, KYC/AML controls, and specific jurisdiction rules, even though the tokens are transferable on-chain. The move is part of Robinhood's broader strategy to evolve from a retail brokerage into a global financial ecosystem, integrating services like banking, retirement, crypto, and DeFi. Robinhood Chain aims to provide a programmable settlement layer, making financial products more portable and accessible while masking underlying complexity. However, the "brokerage chain paradox" lies in balancing a simple user interface with the intricate, regulated reality of the wrapped assets. The success of this model depends on users and regulators accepting this structured approach without misunderstanding the tokens as direct stock ownership. Key components supporting this strategy include the Bitstamp acquisition (expanding institutional crypto capabilities), the Robinhood Wallet (bridging brokerage and self-custody), the Robinhood Earn program (integrating DeFi lending), and the Lighter perpetual contracts platform. While ambitious, the initiative is still early, facing challenges in achieving liquidity, developer adoption, and regulatory clarity across jurisdictions.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

The article, originally from Bankless, discusses how MicroStrategy's (MSTR) recent Bitcoin (BTC) sales reveal a much larger potential selling capacity than the widely reported $1.25 billion "reserve-building" cap. On July 7, MicroStrategy disclosed a sale of 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to pay dividends for its STRAT (STRC) preferred shares and replenish its USD Reserve. Crucially, the company stated this sale did not count against its stated $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." The analysis explains that MicroStrategy's "BTC Monetization Plan," part of its broader "Digital Credit Capital Framework," actually outlines three main purposes for selling BTC, only one of which has the $1.25B cap: 1. **Building the USD Reserve** (capped at $1.25B). 2. **Covering preferred share/ debt costs** (replenishing the reserve after payments). 3. **Funding buybacks** (up to $10B for preferred shares and $10B for MSTR common stock). The key nuance is the accounting distinction between "building" the reserve (selling BTC before making payments) and "replenishing" it (selling BTC after using reserve funds for payments). While functionally the same—converting BTC to cash for obligations—only "building" counts against the publicized $1.25B limit. This means sales for "replenishing" and the $20B+ buyback pool allow for total potential sales exceeding $30B. The article frames this as part of MicroStrategy's shift from a simple "buy and hold" Bitcoin narrative to an "active capital management" model, where BTC becomes a balance-sheet tool to manage pressures between its common stock, preferred shares, dollar reserve, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates complex trade-offs and potential conflicts of interest. The conclusion warns investors that the $1.25B figure is not a total sales ceiling. Understanding terms like "build," "replenish," and "repurchase" in MicroStrategy's disclosures is now critical, as the company navigates a new, more complex role as an actively managed entity rather than a passive Bitcoin accumulator.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片