Whispers Of Insider Selling As Mantra DAO Relocates Nearly $27 Million In OM To Binance

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-04-15Actualizado a 2025-04-15

Resumen

The cryptocurrency project Mantra is coming under increasing suspicion after its OM token shed 90% of its value within a...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The cryptocurrency project Mantra is coming under increasing suspicion after its OM token shed 90% of its value within a single day. The value dropped from $6.27 to only $0.72, erasing more than $5 billion in market value. What transpired next only served to worsen the situation.

Based on blockchain data, Mantra DAO—the project’s behind-the-scenes organization—sent $26.95 million of OM tokens to a Binance wallet on Monday, April 14. This is just after the price’s massive dump, which triggered red flags among observers.

Detractors cite a disturbing fact: the Mantra team owns around 90% of all OM tokens. The high concentration of ownership and timing of the exchange transfers have fueled accusations of potential insider selling.

Mantra CEO Denies Token Dumping Accusations

Mantra chief executive JP Mullin has rebutted such allegations. He said the team and investors didn’t dump their holdings during the crash.

Instead, Mullin attributed the price decline to “forced liquidations” instigated by cryptocurrency exchanges. Such liquidations occur when exchanges sell traders’ holdings automatically after they are unable to cover margin calls.

But his account is not to everyone’s liking. Various independent analysts have monitored suspicious token transfers that point to a different narrative.

OM price has sustained a steep drop in the last week. Source: CoinMarketCap

On-Chain Detective Work Reveals Suspicious Transfers

Crypto analyst Max Brown found that Mantra transferred nearly 4 million OM tokens to cryptocurrency exchange OKX shortly before prices began to decline.

The problem for investigators is that once tokens are moved to centralized exchanges like Binance or OKX, they become much more challenging to trace. This is essentially a blind spot where the tokens can be disposed of while leaving behind no clear trail on public blockchains.

While analysts cannot prove it for a fact that insiders sold off tokens, the gradient of movements into exchanges just ahead of the price tumble certainly gives room for serious doubt.

Exchanges Provide Varying Account Of The Crash

Major cryptocurrency exchanges launched investigations as to what triggered the spectacular fall of the OM token.

Binance, the largest crypto exchange in terms of trading volume, corroborates Mullin’s account. In early findings, they indicate cross-exchange liquidations most likely caused the crash, which would support the CEO’s explanation.

MANTRA is now trading at $0.61. Chart: TradingView

OKX paints a different picture. The exchange cited “major changes” in OM’s tokenomics as a possible cause. They also noted that multiple blockchain addresses had sent large quantities of tokens to exchanges during the time of the crash.

The contradicting accounts by various players in the market have left investors uncertain about what actually transpired. With $5 billion of market value lost and no certainty, confidence in the project has been severely undermined.

Featured image from Blueberry Markets, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Criptos en tendencia

Lecturas Relacionadas

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

Lilian Weng, former OpenAI security VP and co-founder of Thinking Machines Lab, has published a new blog post titled "Harness Engineering for Self-Improvement," proposing a pragmatic path for AI self-evolution. She argues that Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) may practically begin at the "Harness" layer—the external runtime system governing how models use tools, manage context, and execute tasks—rather than directly from the model rewriting its own weights. The blog outlines a progression from optimizing prompts (Context Engineering) to designing workflows, and ultimately to Self-Improving Harness systems. These systems can identify their own weaknesses, propose targeted, verifiable modifications to the harness code, and validate improvements. Works like Self-Harness and Darwin Gödel Machine (DGM) demonstrate significant performance gains on benchmarks like SWE-bench through such automated harness evolution, rivaling handcrafted agents. DeepSeek researcher Tianyi Cui endorsed the view, noting harness-based self-evolution is as promising as model-based approaches. Weng emphasizes this is complementary to model training, with both reinforcing each other. However, key challenges remain: weak evaluators for subjective tasks, reward hacking, diversity collapse, managing long-term system health versus short-term success, and defining the human oversight role. The consensus is growing: the harness is a critical variable, as the same model can exhibit vastly different capabilities within different harness systems.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Odaily Editorial Department Tea Party (July 8)

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (July 8) This is an informal column from Odaily's editorial team, sharing immediate thoughts on industry news, data, and hot topics from various angles. It presents investment ideas and opportunity hypotheses still under verification—which may not be direct wealth codes but questions in themselves—alongside observations from industry interactions and materials that genuinely enhance the team's understanding. The content is based on real investment and observation experiences, carries no advertising, and does not constitute investment advice. Its purpose is to broaden perspectives and supplement information sources, not to create consensus. Team Member Shares: * **Wenser (@wenser2010):** Noted a deeper correction (nearly 30%) in US and Korean stocks, including memory stocks, but remains bullish on DRAM due to perceived supply shortages. In prediction markets, personal small bets outperformed blind copying; favors France to win the World Cup. Views crypto-related stocks like STRK as bearish for now, while seeing Circle and Coinbase as potential rebound plays. Observes recent strength in software stocks like Microsoft but is unsure if it's a sustained recovery. * **Bcxiongdi (@bcxiongdi):** Discusses the recent "recovery training" in meme coin markets on Solana and BSC, characterized by small-scale PVP opportunities, admitting to having sold many assets too early. Suggests also watching the Robinhood chain. Found World Cup prediction markets challenging, advising to consider buying during matches rather than only before. * **Azuma (@azuma_eth):** Focuses on the US stock market, particularly the significant semiconductor correction. Believes demand fundamentals remain and considers buying the dip in DRAM stocks. Notes a potential rotation signal as hedge funds have recently concentrated buying in tech stocks. Plans to continue adding to RKLB (Rocket Lab) stock, seeing limited downside and high upside potential at current levels after its founder's share sale window closed.

Odaily星球日报Hace 55 min(s)

Odaily Editorial Department Tea Party (July 8)

Odaily星球日报Hace 55 min(s)

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Former Huawei "Genius Youth" Li Bojie recently drew public attention by criticizing his interview experience with DeepSeek. The controversy escalated when Du Jun, co-founder of Web3 investment firm ABCDE Capital, publicly accused Li of being "the founder with the least sense of contractual spirit" he had ever cooperated with, sparking a dispute over Li's startup project, Metagent. Li detailed a frustrating DeepSeek interview where he was accused of potential plagiarism, leading him to end the session. The spotlight then shifted to his venture, Metagent, a Web3+AI project aiming to tokenize AI agents. ABCDE invested $1.5 million, with an initial $500k disbursed. Du Jun claimed the project's progress was severely lacking, with a poor-quality demo and minimal social media activity. He alleged Li stopped communicating, deleted his Telegram, and failed to provide proper financial reporting. In response, Li argued the remaining $1 million was never received, crippling operations and forcing salary cuts. He stated he left Metagent in October 2024 due to family reasons and Web3 compliance concerns, with board approval. He claimed to have fulfilled disclosure duties and that his subsequent projects avoided conflicting fields. Other investors, including ArkStream Capital, shared negative due diligence experiences, citing unprofessional contracts and evasive answers on tokenomics. Metagent's social media went silent in June 2024, effectively stalling. Li has since moved to a new consumer AI agent platform, Pine AI (formerly Logenic AI), which has raised $25 million in Series A funding. He served as its Chief Scientist but recently left, clarifying he was not the founder and departed due to a shift in research interests.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar DAO

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar DAO Maker (DAO) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar DAO Maker (DAO) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu DAO Maker (DAO)Después de comprar tu DAO Maker (DAO), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear DAO Maker (DAO)Tradear fácilmente con DAO Maker (DAO) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

195 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar DAO

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de DAO (DAO).

活动图片