Pi Ad Network Now Open to All Mainnet Developers

TheCryptoTimesPublicado a 2025-04-15Actualizado a 2025-04-15

The Pi Ad Network is now open to all developers with apps listed on the Mainnet Ecosystem Interface. After testing it with just a few apps in its pilot phase, Pi is now ready to roll it out to more developers, offering them a chance to earn revenue by leveraging the attention of Pi’s large community.

The Pi Ad Network was first introduced last year to see how it could help developers monetize their apps by placing ads within the Pi ecosystem. The results of the pilot were promising, and now, Pi is expanding the program. 

Developers can apply to join, but keep in mind that not all applications will be accepted. To be eligible, apps have to meet certain requirements and follow the ecosystem guidelines.

What makes the Pi Ad Network stand out is its ability to turn user attention into real rewards for developers. Developers earn Pi based on how much attention their apps get. This creates a unique system where both developers and Pi users benefit. 

Developers are paid in Pi, the same currency their users are holding, which makes the whole system work in a more connected and sustainable way.

For developers, this is a solid way to start earning from their apps while also helping the Pi ecosystem grow. The more buzz their app creates, the more Pi they can make, which helps them cover costs and stay motivated to keep improving. Everyone wins.

For Pi users, this means even more ways to spend their Pi. As developers earn from the ads, they can put that money into creating more apps, giving the community more options and helping Pi grow even faster.

If developers want to join the Pi Ad Network, it’s super simple. They just head to the Pi Developer Portal on the Pi Browser, choose their app, check off the necessary steps, and submit.

This expansion is huge for Pi, giving developers a way to earn while making the ecosystem stronger and more sustainable.

Also Read: Pi Network is now integrated into Chainlink data ecosystem

Lecturas Relacionadas

Google Engineer Arrested For Using Company’s Own Search Data To Win $1.2 Million On Polymarket

A Google information security engineer, Michele Spagnuolo, has been arrested and charged with commodities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. Prosecutors allege he used confidential internal Google search data to place bets on the crypto-based prediction market Polymarket, winning approximately $1.2 million by knowing outcomes before the public. Using an internal tool showing real-time search trends, he reportedly placed successful wagers on contracts tied to Google's "Year in Search" rankings for 2025. This is the second federal criminal case involving Polymarket insider trading in just over a month, following an April arrest of a U.S. Army sergeant accused of using classified military information. The cases highlight increasing legal scrutiny of prediction markets, with blockchain transparency aiding prosecutors. Google placed Spagnuolo on leave and is cooperating with authorities.

bitcoinistHace 36 min(s)

Google Engineer Arrested For Using Company’s Own Search Data To Win $1.2 Million On Polymarket

bitcoinistHace 36 min(s)

Galaxy Weighs Theories After $8.3M Bitcoin Burn Mystery

Galaxy Research is investigating a mysterious Bitcoin transaction where approximately 107 BTC (worth $8.3 million) was deliberately sent to a provably unspendable "burn" address. The primary question is the motive behind destroying such a large sum. Galaxy proposed several theories, including a tax-loss strategy (though deemed unlikely for old coins), a religious or ideological act, an attempt to dispose of illicit funds, or coercion. The firm suggested a plausible explanation could be an automated error, where a trading system mistakenly sent funds to a known burn address labeled "Counterparty" instead of the intended recipient. Galaxy acknowledged all theories are speculative, and the true reason may never be known.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Galaxy Weighs Theories After $8.3M Bitcoin Burn Mystery

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片