Ripple CEO Says Trump’s Pro-Crypto Shift Sparked US Deal Surge

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-03-25Actualizado a 2025-03-25

Resumen

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse confirmed in an interview with FOX Business that financial institutions, particularly banks, are increasing their engagement...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse confirmed in an interview with FOX Business that financial institutions, particularly banks, are increasing their engagement with Ripple and XRP following the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) decision to end its investigation into the company. The development marks a significant turning point for Ripple and potentially the broader digital asset sector in the United States.

Ripple CEO: US Market Reawakens

Garlinghouse, reflecting on Ripple’s multi-year legal battle with the SEC, described the conclusion as an industry-wide win. “Ripple is really amongst the very first crypto companies to get sued by the SEC. We said then, when it started, that the SEC was going to be on the wrong side of the law as well as on the wrong side of history. It took longer than we would have liked… more than $150 million of legal bills, but we’re thrilled with the ultimate outcome. It allows us to really unlock the US market,” Garlinghouse stated.

Ripple, which has traditionally focused on cross-border payments, faced significant headwinds in the US market during the regulatory uncertainty. According to Garlinghouse, about 95% of Ripple’s current customer base consists of non-US financial institutions, including global giants like HSBC and BBVA. However, the conclusion of the SEC investigation is now prompting a noticeable shift in domestic engagement.

“In the six weeks after President Trump was elected, we signed more deals in the United States than we had in the previous six months. These are very innovative technologies. I think they’re going to play out over 10, even 20 years in terms of how they integrate and rewire the financial infrastructure of the United States. That’s across payments, that’s across even the settlement of maybe real estate transactions, securities transactions. […] I think people are underestimating how big that change is,” Garlinghouse disclosed.

The increased interest follows two major executive orders signed by President Trump as part of his pro-crypto agenda. These include initiatives aimed at “strengthening American leadership in digital financial technology” and establishing a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and US digital asset stockpile”. Speaking at the Digital Asset Summit in New York City last week, President Trump told attendees, “You will unleash an explosion of economic growth, and with the dollar-backed stablecoins, you’ll help expand the dominance of the US dollar.”

Garlinghouse called the shift in sentiment a profound “unlock” for US financial institutions. He remarked, “Banks that were really hesitant and nervous about touching crypto technologies or even helping their customers, those banks and those financial institutions are leaning in now, and that’s a big deal—not just for Ripple, but for the whole industry.”

The conversation also turned toward the ongoing regulatory framework discussions in Washington. Garlinghouse praised the efforts of lawmakers such as Senator Cynthia Lummis and Congressman French Hill, who are leading initiatives to clarify how digital assets are classified and regulated under US law. “It can’t just be executive orders. It needs to be codified with legislative efforts by Congress,” he stated, referencing progress on both a stablecoin bill and a market structure bill that could provide the clarity the industry has long sought.

Garlinghouse reiterated that XRP’s legal status has already received validation from the federal judiciary: “XRP was deemed to be a commodity or not a security by a federal judge, which is the opposite of what the SEC had said.” This ruling, coupled with pending legislation, is expected to strengthen Ripple’s position both domestically and internationally.

With trillions of dollars still flowing through outdated global payment systems like SWIFT, Garlinghouse sees the modernization opportunity as massive. “That’s a technology architecture developed 50 years ago. There’s an opportunity to modernize that […] The US is finally unlocked, and I think people are underestimating how big that change is.”

As Ripple moves forward, the company anticipates that regulatory clarity will accelerate the integration of blockchain technologies into mainstream financial services, ranging from payments to securities settlement. Garlinghouse concluded, “That will allow this innovation, allow more job creation, more innovation, and frankly capital formation here in the United States.”

At press time, XRP traded at $2.4295.

XRP price
XRP retests the trend line, 1-day chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image from YouTube, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片