US Cracks Down On Crypto Fraud, Returning $8.2 Million To Victims

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-03-04Actualizado a 2025-03-04

Resumen

Victims of the “wrong number” scam across the United States, including Ohio, are getting some form of justice thanks to...

Victims of the “wrong number” scam across the United States, including Ohio, are getting some form of justice thanks to the latest initiatives of the US authorities. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), 33 crypto fraud victims nationwide, including a city of Mentor resident, have been identified. Court documents reveal that the victims lost more than $4.9 million, and the FBI is currently identifying five more accounts and their owners that are potential victims. 

Also, the US Attorney’s Office of the Northern District of Ohio has submitted a civil complaint requesting the forfeiture of 8,207,578 Tether valued at around $8.2 million. Authorities revealed that the victims were convinced to invest in cryptocurrency scams through messaging using random phone numbers.

‘Wrong Number’ Scam Targets Unsuspecting Victims To Invest In Fake Crypto Projects

The FBI and the US Attorney’s Office of the Northern Ohio District work overtime to bring the scammers to justice. According to court documents and stories of victims, the scammers sent them messages from random numbers, pretending they had reached the wrong number. 

Then, the scammers will befriend the recipients to gain their trust and convince them to invest in a cryptocurrency scam. According to the FBI, 33 victims have already been identified, and five more are being considered, with losses exceeding $6 million. 

From Crypto.com To Another Wallet

“A.H.”, one of the victims from Mentor, Ohio, shared how the scammers reached her. She shared that the scammer sent her a message in November 2023, and they soon started exchanging messages about religion and hobbies, which she believed to be a resident of Seattle, Washington.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3 trillion. Chart: TradingView

After gaining her trust, the scammer convinced her to consider digital currency investments. “A.H.” revealed that she invested $250k into the project after she was told to set up an account at Crypto.com and wire the funds to the exchange. Then, she added that she was instructed to send the money to a specific crypto address.

Investigators Look At Blockchain Data To Track Funds

After receiving the complaint from “A.H.”, Investigators immediately reviewed and tracked the transactions on the blockchain. The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center led the investigations, and the team discovered that some of the missing funds were swapped for Tether. After getting a federal seizure warrant, Tether immediately complied, froze the funds, and promptly transferred these to the authorities.

On February 27th, acting US Attorney for Ohio Carol Skutnik and assistant US Attorney Morford requested that all funds be transferred to three crypto addresses so that they could facilitate the return of the money to scam victims.

Featured image from Reuters, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Lecturas Relacionadas

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片