Сеть Arbitrum One обработала более 1 млрд транзакций

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2024-01-01Actualizado a 2024-10-01

Команда проекта Arbitrum объявила о том, что их L2-сеть обработала более 1 млрд транзакций.
Решение было запущено в 2021 году.
Arbitrum One находится на втором месте по суточному количеству транзакций, уступая только Base.

L2-сеть Arbitrum One обработала более $1 млрд транзакций, на что ей потребовалось около трех лет. Однако решение уступает Base по суточному количеству сделок.

1 billion tx on Arbitrum.

1 million Infinite Rainbows mints by@JimenaBuenaVida.

To celebrate, here’s some Stylus alfa!

Mint ends on Sunday, Oct 6 at 12:00pm ET only at https://t.co/sQqCiD2MuS. Physical redemptions start on Monday, Oct 7 at 12:00pm ET for all holders. pic.twitter.com/6500vzdoJ6
— Arbitrum (💙,🧡) (@arbitrum) September 30, 2024

По данным дашборда The Block, сеть занимает второе место среди решений второго уровня по суточному количеству транзакций. 30 сентября 2024 года, например, Arbitrum One обработала 1,7 млн сделок.

На первом месте находится L2-решение от биржи Coinbase — Base — с показателем в 4,99 млн. На третьем — OP Mainnet, 765 910 транзакций.

Суточное количество транзакций в сетях второго уровня. Источник: The Block.

Общая заблокированная стоимость (TVL) Arbitrum One составляет $2,5 млрд, согласно DeFiLlama. С конца июля 2024 года, когда в показателях решения наметился спад, значение сократилось на более чем $700 млн.

Вместе с тем сеть входит в топ-5 по TVL:

Топ-5 сетей по показателю TVL. Источник: DeFiLlama.

В июне 2024 года активность в этой экосистеме, а также объем собранных комиссий существенно выросли. Это было обусловлено платным клеймом токенов протокола LayerZero.

До этого, в декабре 2023 года, скачок активности в сети произошел из-за запуска аналога «надписей», что вызвало рост комиссий. Однако повышение нагрузки в итоге привело к сбою в работе Arbitrum One.

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Lecturas Relacionadas

Edel Finance loses $403K as flash-loan oracle exploit hits xStock lending reserves

Edel Finance, a programmable market layer for tokenized equities, suffered a $403,000 exploit. An attacker manipulated the wrapped xStocks (wGOOGLx) exchange rate via a flash loan, briefly inflating the collateral's value 78-fold to borrow far beyond its true worth. Although the protocol acted promptly to limit losses, the attack revealed critical oracle and collateral pricing vulnerabilities in tokenized lending markets. The exploit severely impacted liquidity, causing total value locked (TVL) to plummet from around $630,000 to roughly $947 as users withdrew funds. A net outflow of approximately $630,000 followed. Recovery hinges on restoring user confidence through deposit growth, stabilized TVL, and stronger oracle protections and risk management practices.

ambcryptoHace 6 min(s)

Edel Finance loses $403K as flash-loan oracle exploit hits xStock lending reserves

ambcryptoHace 6 min(s)

Crypto Payment Cards with $1.5 Billion Monthly Transaction Volume, Stuck in the 1990s

Monthly crypto payment card transaction volume has reached $15 billion, but the industry's development stage is comparable to debit cards in the 1990s, before they became a mainstream financial staple. A key limitation is the lack of established daily financial relationships, such as direct salary deposits and recurring bill payments, with crypto wallets. Despite annualized transaction volumes of approximately $18 billion, the market is concentrated and immature. The leading provider, RedotPay, commands over half the market share. User adoption is heavily skewed towards emerging markets like Bangladesh, India, and Nigeria, where access to USD and stable financial services is limited, rather than developed economies. The sector features four primary business models: 1) Card-issuing infrastructure providers, 2) Exchange-affiliated cards for user retention, 3) Decentralized wallet/DeFi cards with self-custody but high complexity, and 4) Stablecoin-focused digital banks, which dominate transaction volume by offering integrated financial services. The article argues that a pure payment functionality is insufficient for long-term success, mirroring the historical trajectory of traditional debit cards. Future winners will need to: 1) Control the upstream flow of funds, 2) Secure defensible niches in underserved markets, and 3) Most crucially, build core account relationships that integrate into users' daily financial lives. Without this evolution, crypto cards risk remaining niche prepaid tools rather than becoming universal financial infrastructure.

Foresight NewsHace 7 min(s)

Crypto Payment Cards with $1.5 Billion Monthly Transaction Volume, Stuck in the 1990s

Foresight NewsHace 7 min(s)

$7.8 Billion in Theft and Losses Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become an Unavoidable Liquidity Tax for DeFi

"7.8 Billion in Thefts Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become DeFi's Unavoidable 'Liquidity Tax'" A summary of Q2 2026 data reveals that security risks are now a fundamental capital cost in DeFi, directly impacting user returns and liquidity decisions. DeFiLlama recorded 88 hacking incidents with quantified losses totaling $780.3 million in Q2. April was the worst month with $644.8 million lost. DeFi protocol attacks accounted for $735.8 million, while cross-chain bridge exploits resulted in $354.4 million in losses (note: some event categorizations overlap). Cumulatively, DeFi hacks have reached $7.85 billion, with bridge losses at $3.26 billion. The quarter highlighted two primary risk categories: high-value infrastructure vulnerabilities (e.g., bridges, oracles, admin keys) causing massive single losses, and more frequent contract logic bugs. This signals a critical market shift: from post-incident analysis to preemptive pricing of risk. Users and liquidity providers now implicitly factor in the security of the entire asset pathway—not just pool APY—into their decisions. This hidden "risk premium" manifests through wider spreads, higher liquidity incentives, and capital migration towards perceived safer routes. Cross-chain bridge risks, responsible for over $353 million in Q2 losses, exemplify this change. Asset routing credibility is now part of the transaction. Following incidents like KelpDAO and THORChain, markets are demanding safer bridges, asset insurance, and clearer risk disclosure, increasing the cost of capital for riskier pathways. Consequently, security spending is transforming from a defensive cost into a core distribution cost for attracting liquidity. Protocols must invest more in audits, bug bounties, real-time monitoring, and insurance to remain competitive. Users are increasingly demanding transparency about fund flow paths, associated risks, and contingency plans. The key indicators for the industry's direction will be whether capital continues consolidating in trusted channels, if projects delay launches for enhanced audits, if insurance premiums rise, and if aggregators start displaying security risk metrics. Q2 2026 may be remembered not just as a bad period, but as the point when DeFi underwent a fundamental asset risk repricing, where security became a persistent,隐性 tax on all on-chain activity.

Foresight NewsHace 36 min(s)

$7.8 Billion in Theft and Losses Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become an Unavoidable Liquidity Tax for DeFi

Foresight NewsHace 36 min(s)

Ethereum at $1.5K: A tense stand-off forms, with ETH shorts under pressure

Ethereum faces a tense standoff, trading around $1,500 after a nearly 50% decline in the first half of 2026. While technicals and bearish derivatives positioning signal downside risk, key on-chain data suggests a potential trap for short sellers. Large transfers to exchanges are accompanied by significant stablecoin inflows, indicating whales may be preparing to buy rather than sell. Furthermore, strong user retention and rising ETH staking activity are reducing available supply. This clash between heavy bearish bets and solid holder conviction creates conditions for a possible short squeeze, making the current consolidation risky for those positioned for further downside.

ambcryptoHace 36 min(s)

Ethereum at $1.5K: A tense stand-off forms, with ETH shorts under pressure

ambcryptoHace 36 min(s)

Breaking News: The "Worker's Edition" Claude 5 Is Here, Everyone Can Use It

BREAKING: Claude Sonnet 5, dubbed "Fennec," is now the default model for all Free and Pro users. This mid-tier model boasts the strongest Agent capabilities in the Sonnet line yet, with performance rivaling the flagship Opus 4.8. It features autonomous planning and can utilize browser and terminal tools—capabilities previously exclusive to costly, large models. Key benchmarks highlight significant gains over its predecessor, Sonnet 4.6, in reasoning, tool use, coding, and knowledge work. Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on SWE-bench Pro (surpassing GPT-5.5's 58.6%), 80.4% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, and 57.4% on Humanity's Last Exam (just 0.5% behind Opus 4.8). It even slightly outperforms Opus 4.8 in some knowledge tasks. Anthropic positions it as delivering ~90% of Opus's capability at a fraction of the cost. Pricing is aggressive: a limited-time promotional rate of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens (reverting to $3/$15 after August 31). This undercuts Opus 4.8 ($5/$25) and GPT-5.5 ($5/$30). However, a new tokenizer may increase token counts by 1.0-1.35x, affecting final costs post-promotion. Notably, Sonnet 5 excels in security, with a mere 0.93% browser injection attack success rate, outperforming Mythos 5 and Opus 4.8. Its prompt injection defense matches Opus 4.8 at 0.19%. Launching amid uncertainty around the region-restricted Fable 5, Sonnet 5 is globally available. It targets the mid-market, offering near-flagship performance at a competitive price, effectively lowering the barrier for multi-Agent development and presenting a compelling alternative for cost-conscious developers.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Breaking News: The "Worker's Edition" Claude 5 Is Here, Everyone Can Use It

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ONE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Harmony (ONE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Harmony (ONE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Harmony (ONE)Después de comprar tu Harmony (ONE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Harmony (ONE)Tradear fácilmente con Harmony (ONE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

308 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ONE (ONE).