观点:对加密行业近期前景持乐观态度的三点原因

链捕手Publicado a 2024-09-29Actualizado a 2024-09-29

原标题:《Where are we in the cycle?》

作者:The DeFi Investor, 加密KOL

编译:Felix, PANews

 

本文将介绍当下加密周期正处于哪个阶段,并解释为什么对近期前景保持乐观态度。

BTC周期投资回报率正处于此周期阶段的正常水平

观点:对加密行业近期前景持乐观态度的三点原因

就BTC表现而言,这一市场周期与2016年和2020年的牛市非常相似。

金融市场往往具有周期性,因为人性永远不会改变。这就是为什么BTC似乎不太可能已经见顶。

过去两次牛市有两个共同点:

  • 真正的BTC上涨趋势始于比特币减半后约170-180天
  • BTC周期顶部在比特币减半后约480天达到

自2024年BTC减半事件以来,仅过去了160天。

鉴于以往情况,当下很有可能距离BTC恢复上涨趋势只有几周的时间。

尽管这是假设历史会重演,但也看不出本次牛市有什么不同。

交易所BTC储备正在以创纪录的速度下降

观点:对加密行业近期前景持乐观态度的三点原因

自2024年1月以来,已有超50万枚BTC从交易所提出。

当巨鲸从交易所提出他们的代币时,通常表明他们计划持有一段时间,而不是短期内出售。

上述的图表表明,巨鲸在过去几个月中一直在大量BTC。

如果这种囤积继续下去,供应紧缩的情况即将出现。

从历史上看,比特币季是每轮周期的第一阶段

观点:对加密行业近期前景持乐观态度的三点原因

上图是多年前制作的,但很好地总结了2016年和2020年周期中发生的事情。

  • 首先,BTC反弹,其主导地位上升
  • 然后,市场注意力开始转向主流币(ETH、SOL等)
  • 最后,无论市值或基本面,几乎每种山寨币都开始上涨

最近BTC的主导地位创下了多年来的新高。

这可能表明当下仍处于第一阶段。从历史上看,山寨币季只有在BTC的主导地位开始下降后才会开始。加密行业即将进入第二阶段。

基于以上所有图表和之前牛市的历史数据,BTC很可能在第四季度创下历史新高。

但目前仍然存在一些宏观不确定性。

如果全球经济衰退开始,加密货币将受到严重影响。

然而近期不太可能出现经济衰退的原因是今年是美国的选举年。

为了让哈里斯有机会赢得美国总统大选,民主党将尽其所能推迟。

虽然美国经济衰退可能在未来3-4年的某个时候开始,但绝不会在2024年发生。

因此,对第四季度的加密货币持乐观态度。希望信念和耐心很快就会开始得到回报。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片