未来数字经济的保障:哈里斯的政策胜于特朗普

marsbitPublicado a 2024-09-26Actualizado a 2024-09-26

哈里斯的“机会经济”将如何惠及加密行业

Crypto4Harris 组织的发起人之一 G Clay Miller 阐述了他认为哈里斯政府为何会比特朗普政府更有利于数字资产行业发展的原因。

单一议题的加密货币选民压倒性地支持唐纳德·特朗普,这是有原因的。拜登政府对数字资产的敌对立场现在被归因于卡玛拉·哈里斯,而特朗普在近几个月来公开拥抱该行业。如果单纯从候选人公开的言论(或保持沉默)来看,认为特朗普会对该行业更有利是合乎逻辑的。然而,如果仔细观察每位候选人的整体政策主张,我认为不难看出,哈里斯政府将为加密货币的长期发展创造更好的环境。

卡玛拉·哈里斯近日终于打破了她在数字资产问题上的沉默。9月22日,她在纽约市的一场筹款活动中表示,她将“在保护消费者和投资者的同时,鼓励人工智能和数字资产等创新技术的发展”。9月25日,她在匹兹堡表示,她希望美国“在区块链领域占据主导地位”。

这些言论是在民主党加密货币行业领导者联合成立Crypto4Harris运动并举办市政厅会议,倡导民主党在数字资产政策上进行“重启”一个多月后发表的。我承认,与特朗普从怀疑者到支持者的180度转变相比,哈里斯的言论显得相对保守。

对许多人来说,这些言论是她愿意支持加密行业的首个明确信号。但对于那些一直在追踪她政策动向和解读迹象的人来说,这一切早有迹象。她的顾问和代表们已经表现出支持的姿态,她的竞选团队也参与了深思熟虑的对话,包括参议院多数党领袖查克·舒默(D-NY)和众议院金融服务委员会资深成员、众议员马克辛·沃特斯(D-CA)在内的民主党国会领导人也明确表达了他们的立场。同时,哈里斯本人的言论、政策主张和竞选口号都暗示她将有别于拜登政府对加密货币的限制性政策。业内人士有信心,未来若哈里斯上台,可能会带来一场“政策重启”。

我认为,尽管两位候选人在加密货币问题上的公开表态存在差异,但卡玛拉·哈里斯的总统任期将更有利于我们未来的数字经济。首先,我将指出前总统在言辞与行动不符的地方,以及他为获取优势而撒谎或夸大的种种行为。接着,我会解释哈里斯提出的“机会经济”愿景为何能够更广泛地惠及我们的行业。

以下是对特朗普持怀疑态度的一些原因:

1.没有总统行动:

乔·拜登肯定不是加密货币的支持者,但特朗普也不是。特朗普在他四年的任期内没有采取任何措施来支持该行业。实际上,他启动了财政部的“隐藏财富行动”(Operation Hidden Treasure),这项行动成为了“扼杀行动2.0”(Chokepoint 2.0)的前身。此外,他还公开称加密货币是骗局——使他成为唯一这样表态的总统候选人。

2.缺乏教育背景和不切实际的政策提案:

特朗普提出的许多政策提案不过是模糊的口号和空洞的承诺。他关于加密货币应当“在美国制造”的言论突显了他对验证技术去中心化特性的无知;他承诺“解雇”证券交易委员会主席加里·根斯勒的提议则超出了总统的权力范围;而他声称比特币能够抵消国家债务的说法则显得十分荒唐。

3.他只是追逐金钱:

特朗普对支持该行业的转变可以通过追踪大额捐赠者对他竞选活动的资金流动来清晰地看到。以安德森·霍洛维茨(Andreesen Horowitz)和温克尔沃斯兄弟(Winklevii)为起点,他与捐赠者的互动增加与捐赠者对他竞选活动的支持直接相关。无论好坏,加密货币行业几乎占据了本周期所有企业政治捐款的近一半。此外,他最近的商业冒险“世界自由金融”(World Liberty Financial)做出了相互矛盾的声明:最初宣布仅向合格投资者开放,但后来又推出了公共代币(总供应量的20%被保留给特朗普家族成员)。这引发了伦理问题,导致许多专家认为他对这个行业的兴趣仅在于为自己填补口袋。

虽然特朗普确实提出了一些非常具体的加密货币政策建议,但他的整体经济政策却显得非常模糊。相比之下,哈里斯为创建她所称的“机会经济”制定了详细的战略,这一愿景重新引入了长期失落的社会流动性概念,并解决了美国经济的核心结构性缺陷。通过关注教育、小企业发展以及确保强有力的法治,我们的经济——包括数字经济——在经历了数十年的中产阶级停滞后,有望实现复苏。

以下是哈里斯的“机会经济”将如何鼓励数字资产创新的几点:

1.儿童税收抵免、教育政策和技术职业培训:

哈里斯的机会经济强调通过儿童税收抵免、改善教育政策和扩大技术职业培训的机会来重振中产阶级。这些项目对于推动数字资产创新至关重要。通过培养受过良好教育和拥有技能的劳动力,哈里斯政府将促进维持和扩展区块链及加密生态系统所需的人才。这种对人力资本的重视将直接惠及未来的去中心化技术。

2.通过5万美元创业信贷强调对小企业的支持:

哈里斯平台的一个关键支柱是5万美元的创业信贷,旨在赋能小企业腾飞。这项政策对需要早期资本来启动业务的区块链企业家至关重要。加密行业在支持基层创新的环境中蓬勃发展。小企业是健康经济的支柱,而区块链生态系统中的竞争将促进增长。哈里斯在硅谷的经验和对中小企业政策的理解,反映出她明白下一波去中心化技术的浪潮将不会来自大型企业,而是来自灵活的小型企业。

3.法治对市场运作的重要性:

最重要的是,作为前地方检察官,我们可以相信在哈里斯政府下法治将比一位被定罪的罪犯执政时更为强大。稳定、透明和可预测的法规和制度能够增强人们对系统的信任,使地方企业在不必担心突发法律变化的情况下蓬勃发展。这不仅保障了美国投资者的利益,还向全球市场发出了强烈信号,让外国投资者放心,美国是一个安全且具有创新性的商业场所。通过建立法治带来的信心,哈里斯的经济计划将增强国内和国际对数字资产的兴趣,为增长创造一个稳定的环境。

哈里斯以数据驱动的全面和务实的经济改革方法,涵盖了多元的观点,将带来更广泛的国家利益。蓬勃发展的中产阶级是可持续增长的关键,她的计划强调通过支持那些历史上被遗忘的人群来重新分配机会。她对教育、劳动力培训、小企业创新和法治的关注,创造了一个服务于所有人的经济,而不仅仅是富裕精英的经济——这是加密社区的核心价值。她对监管透明度的承诺增强了市场的稳定性,这对于长期增长至关重要。这种平衡的方法将确保所有美国人都能从经济繁荣中受益。

哈里斯的更广泛经济政策经过了充分研究和详细制定。现在她已开始支持该行业,我相信她的数字资产政策也会随之而来。我希望在选举前,副总统能就这一话题发表更多经过深思熟虑的评论——与特朗普的不可预测策略不同。我相信在哈里斯政府的领导下,美国会变得更加强大,而数字资产行业也会如此。

Lecturas Relacionadas

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

MicroStrategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, has significantly shifted its business model. Between June 29 and July 5, the company sold 3,588 bitcoins for approximately $216 million to fund quarterly dividends for its preferred stock. This marks its largest-ever Bitcoin sale and signals a strategic pivot: Bitcoin is transitioning from a "buy-and-hold" reserve asset to a liquidity management tool for the company. This move follows a recent authorization allowing Bitcoin sales when equity fundraising is less attractive. The announcement contributed to a more than 5% intraday drop in MicroStrategy's stock price, while Bitcoin fell to around $61,800—below the company's average holding cost of roughly $75,700. The sale represents a major departure from MicroStrategy's long-standing "never sell" commitment, which saw its first minor breach in May with a $2.5 million sale. The latest, hundred-times-larger transaction underscores growing financial pressures. Analysts note the company faces about $1.5 billion in annual preferred dividend obligations, far exceeding cash flow from its software business. As of July 5, MicroStrategy holds 843,775 bitcoins. Its current operational logic involves buying Bitcoin during favorable financing conditions and selling portions to cover dividends when needed, creating a flexible capital management cycle amidst a challenging market environment.

华尔街日报Hace 2 hora(s)

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

华尔街日报Hace 2 hora(s)

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

Quantum Computing's Threat to Cryptocurrency: A Countdown to Q-Day Quantum computing, specifically Shor's algorithm, poses a fundamental threat to the public-key cryptography (e.g., ECDSA, RSA) that secures blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This critical juncture, known as Q-Day, is estimated to occur potentially within the next 5-15 years. The core vulnerability stems from the public and immutable nature of blockchains. Assets in addresses where the public key is already exposed on-chain (e.g., spent outputs) are at direct risk, as a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive the private key. This threatens the very trust model of cryptocurrencies. The response lies in Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—algorithms like lattice-based ML-DSA and hash-based SLH-DSA, which are resistant to quantum attacks. NIST has standardized key PQC algorithms (FIPS 203, 204, 205), providing a migration path. However, the primary challenge is not technical but socio-economic and involves complex governance: * **Bitcoin's** path is constrained by its conservative ethos. Migrating requires a soft-fork to new address types, facing hurdles like significantly larger signature sizes and, most critically, the divisive governance question of how to handle at-risk legacy UTXOs without violating core principles. * **Ethereum** is pursuing a "cryptographic agility" strategy, with a multi-layered roadmap. It leverages account abstraction for user accounts and is developing compressed hash-based signatures (e.g., leanXMSS) for its consensus layer, aiming for a full-stack upgrade over time. In conclusion, quantum computing does not spell an instant end for cryptocurrency but initiates a critical countdown. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" to orchestrate a coordinated, ecosystem-wide migration to PQC. The ultimate bottlenecks are the immense coordination efforts and governance decisions required for this foundational transition.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

Former US President Donald Trump reported a record-breaking $2.2 billion in personal income for 2025, the highest annual income ever disclosed by a sitting president. This figure, from a 927-page government ethics filing, represented a 3.5-fold increase from his $600 million income in 2024 and boosted his net worth to $6.5 billion. The primary drivers were cryptocurrency (64% of income, approximately $1.4 billion) and real estate (26%, approximately $575 million). His crypto earnings stemmed largely from the launch of his personal meme coin, $TRUMP, generating over $600 million in licensing fees, and substantial profits from the WLFI token and its parent company. Despite a sluggish property market, his Mar-a-Lago resort and associated golf clubs saw revenue surges of 50% and 27%, respectively, attributed to their use as venues for presidential events. Trump's financial disclosure also revealed an unprecedented level of stock market activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025, averaging 87 trades per market day. Media analyses noted several instances where significant trading coincided with major policy announcements, such as proposed tariffs, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. While the White House stated these trades were handled by a family-managed trust fund and not Trump directly, critics highlighted this as a departure from the blind trusts traditionally used by presidents post-Watergate. The report has intensified debate over the commercialization of the presidency. Supporters view it as a success story of a businessman-president, while critics argue it demonstrates an unprecedented conversion of public influence into private wealth, with policy decisions potentially linked to personal financial gains. The controversy centers on whether Trump's earnings represent innovative entrepreneurship or a fundamental conflict of interest, sparking renewed calls for stricter ethics reforms in US governance.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片