Messari:一文速览稳定币市场的主要竞争者

marsbitPublicado a 2024-09-25Actualizado a 2024-09-26

Tether上季度破纪录的盈利能力使其跻身tradfi巨头之列。但52亿美元这笔巨额利润也让它成为了那些想要分得一杯羹的新竞争对手的目标。

市场

本文我们来深入快速发展的稳定币世界,涉及到中心化领域和去中心化领域。

稳定币全览

我们将做以下几类的垂直细分:

市场

PYUSD

中心化稳定币往往缺乏透明度,而且往往只在具有明确激励的条件下才会出现高交易量。PYUSD是少数收获信任的10亿美元市值规模的中心化稳定币之一。

市场

USD0

通过空投激励以及与Morpho等DeFi平台的合作整合,像USD0这样更加去中心化的金库支持型稳定币迅速增长。USD0市值约为2.5亿美元,很快就达到了这一目标。

市场

Elixir的deUSD

像USDe这样的合成稳定币使用“多头现货+空头期货头寸”来维持其挂钩。由于基差被压缩,USDe失去了市场份额。但像Elixir这样的新协议旨在通过调整其抵押品支持来改进Ethena模式。

市场

GHO

专注于最大限度地去中心化和最大限度地减少人为干预的稳定币一直以来都没有显出太多的需求。GHO可能是个例外,因为它利用了AAVE上持续增长的活跃用户群。

市场

DYAD

创新的设计通常试图实现某种机制来改进典型的抵押债务。

头寸模式。DYAD就是这样的一种稳定币,它的目标是通过另一种名为KEROSENE的代币利用系统内多余抵押品。KEROSENE允许用户抵押外自己的外源资产铸造更多的DYAD。而且,NFT(NOTE)持有者的KEROSENE越多,他们从流动性池中获得的收益就越多。

市场

这些类别的新稳定币都在收益率、可及性、流动性、稳定性和资本效率方面相互竞争。新设计或对旧设计的调整都会涉及到各种利弊权衡:

市场

每周都有新的稳定币进入市场,稳定币领域格局也在不断发展变化。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

From ZEC's Surge to Vitalik's Support: Will the Privacy Narrative Resurface?

From ZEC's surge to Vitalik's endorsement, is privacy making a comeback? The recent rally in ZEC has refocused attention on the crypto privacy sector. This resurgence stems from a growing market realization: while blockchain transparency builds trust, full exposure of user balances, trading strategies, and risk positions can become a vulnerability, especially for large traders and institutions on platforms like Hyperliquid. The privacy landscape has evolved beyond classic anonymity coins like ZEC, XMR, and DASH. It now encompasses privacy infrastructure projects such as Railgun (bringing privacy to DeFi) and Aztec (a privacy-focused L2), as well as newer entrants like Genius Terminal, SilentSwap, and 0xBow that emphasize transaction privacy while attempting to balance compliance. Industry trends confirm privacy is becoming integrated, not a niche feature. Perp DEX Aster has introduced a "Shield Mode," and Vitalik has discussed the need for native privacy at the Ethereum protocol level, including proposals like EIP-8182 for standardized private transfers. In conclusion, this revival is more than a simple sector rotation. It reflects a critical reassessment of transparency's limits. As on-chain finance matures, the challenge is finding a sustainable balance between necessary transparency for trust and essential privacy for protecting assets and strategies, making privacy a potential cornerstone of next-generation infrastructure.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

From ZEC's Surge to Vitalik's Support: Will the Privacy Narrative Resurface?

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片