Crypto Market In Jeopardy? Rising Stablecoins Dominance Signals Instability

bitcoinistPublicado a 2024-09-13Actualizado a 2024-09-13

Resumen

The general cryptocurrency market has been quite unpleasant as major crypto assets have seen extended negative trends, fueling uncertainty within...

The general cryptocurrency market has been quite unpleasant as major crypto assets have seen extended negative trends, fueling uncertainty within the sector. With the recent upsurge in the stablecoins dominance, which is considered a negative sign for cryptocurrencies, the broader ecosystem could be poised for additional pessimistic behavior.

Stablecoin Dominance Growth Poses Risk To Cryptocurrencies

Recent reports from Alphractal, an advanced platform for investment data analysis, show that the dominance of stablecoins is increasing rapidly amidst price fluctuations. Historically, a drop in stablecoin dominance is a bullish indication for cryptocurrencies, as observed from late 2022 to early 2024, while an increase in dominance is a definite signal of a bearish trend.

As market volatility persists, investors appear to be turning to stablecoins in greater numbers, hoping to elude the uncertainty that is affecting larger assets like Ethereum and Bitcoin. This change implies that institutional and retail investors are losing confidence in the current market condition.

According to the platform, the overall market cap of stablecoins is currently over $170 million, indicating 8.62% of the entire cryptocurrency market with Tether (USDT) leading the charge with $118 billion, which represents about 69.6% of all stablecoins market.

In the absence of the USDT and USDC coins, Alphractal noted that the total market cap of stablecoins will decrease significantly. The decline shows that the constant issuance of these two major coins, especially USDT on the TRON blockchain, has been the main driver of the stablecoin market’s growth in the last two years.

Crypto
Rising stablecoin dominance sparks bearish trend for cryptocurrencies | Source: Alphractal on X

Furthermore, the platform highlighted that the stablecoins’ 30-day market cao is another notable factor to watch out for. While an increase in this aspect frequently indicates bullishness in the long term, a decline has historically had a negative impact on the crypto market, drawing attention to a previous incident in 2021.

Alphractal mentioned that in 2021, stablecoins saw a substantial spike, followed by a decline, signaling the start of the crypto bear market. Meanwhile, in 2024, two similar but lesser peaks occurred, which could account for Bitcoin’s lengthy sideways trend since the start of the year.

With the market waning, the platform believes since stablecoins directly affect liquidity and prices they are worth exploring, and understanding their fluctuations can aid in risk management and provide clear trend indications.

Social Media Market Sentiment Is Bearish

Alphractal also revealed in another research a worrying trend about the market on social media platforms and the news. According to the platform, traders’ and technical indicators’ sentiment about the crypto market at present is neutral, indicating a balance or uncertainty.

However, the average sentiment in the news and on the X (formerly Twitter) platform is still bearish. This decline implies a growing pessimism among enthusiasts as conversations regarding the market are constantly dropping on social media platforms.

Crypto
Overall crypto market cap at $1.995 trillion | Source: TOTAL on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from Tradingview.com
Godspower Owie

Godspower Owie

Godspower Owie is my name, and I work for the news platforms NewsBTC and Bitcoinist. I sometimes like to think of myself as an explorer since I enjoy exploring new places, learning new things, especially valuable ones, and meeting new people who have an impact on my life, no matter how small. I value my family, friends, career, and time. Really, those are most likely the most significant aspects of every person's existence. Not illusions, but dreams are what I pursue.

Lecturas Relacionadas

AI Sweeps the Globe, So Why Is Crypto + AI Facing Gloom?

The article "AI Sweeps the Globe, But Why Is Crypto + AI So Bleak?" analyzes the disconnect between the booming AI industry and the struggling crypto+AI sector. It argues the issue is not flawed logic but severe demand-supply mismatch across four key sub-sectors. Decentralized compute and storage projects offer theoretical benefits like cost savings and data sovereignty but lack a decisive technical edge over entrenched cloud providers (AWS, GCP). Enterprises are unwilling to risk migration for unproven infrastructure that can't guarantee the performance and reliability needed for critical AI workloads. ZKML and privacy solutions address important issues like model verification but solve non-urgent, long-term concerns for most businesses currently focused on core performance and ROI. Demand here is likely to be regulation-driven (e.g., EU AI Act) rather than organic. AI agent infrastructure is developing foundational tech for a future multi-agent economy. However, the current market phase is dominated by internal process automation within single companies, making this technology premature. AI agent payments is highlighted as the only sub-sector where blockchain competes on a level playing field with traditional finance, as neither has adequately solved the challenges of machine-to-machine micropayments and real-time settlement. Overall, crypto+AI projects are building for future needs (data ownership, decentralization, transparency) that don't align with the industry's immediate priorities (performance, cost, stability). The absence of a flagship, large-scale use case further hinders mainstream adoption and capital inflow. The path forward requires either adapting to current market demands or patiently building the foundational infrastructure for the next phase of AI.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

AI Sweeps the Globe, So Why Is Crypto + AI Facing Gloom?

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

"King of Pump Calls" Arthur Hayes Strikes Again, This Time Targeting Deribit

On June 29, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes purchased approximately 6.16 million SYN tokens via OTC platform Flowdesk for around $2.2 million. Hayes subsequently declared on X that SYN represents one of the most asymmetric investments he has seen since HYPE, stating it's time for an options DEX to challenge the dominant platform Deribit, and identifying Hypercall as that challenger. SYN's price surged over 40% following his comments, with a tenfold increase in June 2026 alone, bringing its FDV to roughly $110 million. The article details Synapse Protocol's evolution from a cross-chain messaging and liquidity network into the chain-based options trading protocol Hypercall. Hypercall, built on the Hyperliquid ecosystem's HyperEVM, aims to be a universal options exchange supporting any asset size with capped loss (limited to premium paid) and no forced liquidations. Deribit, established in 2016, remains the centralized leader in crypto options with an estimated 85% market share in BTC and ETH options and $3.588 billion in assets. Its strengths include deep liquidity and professional tools, but it faces criticisms over custody risk, KYC requirements, and regulatory uncertainty. The analysis positions Hypercall not as an immediate replacement for Deribit's entrenched network effects, but as a potential complementary and differentiated competitor, particularly for DeFi-native assets and new asset classes like RWA. The article concludes by noting Hayes's recent mixed "call" record, including fully exiting and later re-buying HYPE, and the controversial price target for CARDS from his family office Maelstrom, which was followed by a significant price drop.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

"King of Pump Calls" Arthur Hayes Strikes Again, This Time Targeting Deribit

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

AI is Sweeping the Globe, So Why is Crypto + AI in a Slump?

AI Booms, But Crypto + AI Remains Sluggish: A Demand-Side Analysis Despite the AI industry's explosive growth and massive investment, the convergence of blockchain and AI (Crypto + AI) has seen limited traction. The core issue is a severe supply-demand mismatch, not a flawed premise. Analyzing four key sub-sectors reveals specific gaps: 1. **Decentralized Compute/Storage:** Offer logical benefits like data sovereignty and cost savings but lack a decisive technical advantage over entrenched cloud giants (AWS, GCP). Enterprises prioritize performance and stability and are unwilling to bear the switching risk and uncertainty of decentralized networks. 2. **Model Verification/Privacy (e.g., ZKML):** Address important long-term issues like auditability and data privacy, but these are not urgent operational pain points for most businesses today. Widespread demand will likely follow regulatory mandates (like the EU AI Act), not precede them. 3. **AI Agent Infrastructure:** Projects are building infrastructure for a future of autonomous, interacting agents. However, the current market focus is on internal process automation within corporate firewalls. The technology is ahead of market readiness. 4. **AI Agent Payments:** This is the only sub-sector where blockchain is on a level playing field with traditional finance. Both are trying to solve the unsolved problem of real-time, micro-transactions for machines, making it the most immediately competitive area. The overarching problem is that the AI industry invests heavily in solutions that solve immediate bottlenecks (e.g., faster memory, more power). Most Crypto + AI solutions target secondary, longer-term concerns (decentralization, transparency) and often come with performance trade-offs. The lack of a flagship, large-scale commercial success case further hinders mainstream capital inflow. The path forward requires either aligning more closely with the current industry's performance demands or patiently building the foundational infrastructure for the next phase of AI.

Foresight NewsHace 40 min(s)

AI is Sweeping the Globe, So Why is Crypto + AI in a Slump?

Foresight NewsHace 40 min(s)

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

US spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced approximately $6 billion in net outflows over the past six weeks, marking the longest consecutive weekly withdrawal streak since their launch in 2024. The iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock has been particularly affected, accounting for over 70% of recent outflows. On-chain analysis indicates that long-term Bitcoin holders (holding for over 155 days), who control about 83% of the circulating supply, remain steadfast. The selling pressure is primarily coming from allocators who entered through ETF brokerage accounts. This represents the first major collective capitulation since Bitcoin gained mainstream Wall Street recognition, driven more by risk-off portfolio adjustments than a fundamental rejection of the asset. Factors such as rising inflation, a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve policy, massive capital inflows into AI infrastructure, and attractive IPO opportunities have redirected speculative funds. Bitcoin, treated as a high-beta risk asset, was among the first to be sold. While the pace of outflows has slowed significantly—from $1.72 billion in early June to $226.8 million mid-month—the structural issue remains. IBIT's large size means its outflows alone exert substantial market pressure. With spot market volume thin, new capital inflows absent, and ETF buying muted, the market lacks sufficient buying support to absorb this selling. The coming sessions are critical. If IBIT outflows decelerate and Bitcoin reclaims $60,000, this phase could be seen as a healthy reset. However, if heavy IBIT redemptions resume and the price falls below $58,000, it would signal a more sustained institutional exit, requiring non-ETF buyers to shoulder the entire selling pressure alone. The ETF, while lowering entry barriers, has not removed Bitcoin's inherent volatility.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

**World Models: From Psychology to AI's Core Concept** "World model" is a trending but often confusing term in AI, describing a system that allows machines to internally simulate, predict, and rehearse potential outcomes before taking real-world action—like a mental "sandbox." While definitions vary—Yann LeCun emphasizes physical understanding, OpenAI's Sora is a video-based "world simulator," Google DeepMind's Genie 3 creates interactive 3D environments, and companies like Alibaba and Tesla focus on practical applications—the core goal is consistent: reduce reliance on vast real-world data by creating an internal, predictive model for safer and more efficient AI. The concept has deep roots, tracing back to psychologist Kenneth Craik (1943). In AI, it was revitalized by researchers like David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber (2018). Major technical approaches include: 1) generative video models (e.g., Sora) for visual realism; 2) abstract predictive models (e.g., LeCun's JEPA) for efficiency and physical reasoning; and 3) explicit 3D simulators (e.g., NVIDIA Omniverse) for precision. Fei-Fei Li proposes a classification based on the AI action loop: renderers (output observations), simulators (output world states), and planners (output actions). The emerging "World Action Model" (WAM) paradigm aims to unify future prediction and action generation. An industry framework is forming: upstream (data, compute, sensors), midstream (general and vertical platforms), and downstream applications (autonomous driving, robotics, gaming, etc.). Autonomous driving is currently the most mature use case. The current lack of a unified definition reflects the field's early, dynamic stage, similar to past tech revolutions. Different approaches—focusing on pixels, physics, or behavior—represent parallel explorations of how best to compress and understand the world. This diversity, while seemingly chaotic, signals that world models have moved from an academic idea to a critical industrial battleground, ultimately aiming to give machines the ability to understand, imagine, and reason about the world.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片