加密遗产:加密资产如何被继承?

Meta之光Publicado a 2022-06-09Actualizado a 2022-06-09

Resumen

继承是新兴加密生态系统中最被忽视的问题之一;根据最新的市场分析,目前无法访问近400万比特币(BTC)。

继承是新兴加密生态系统中最被忽视的问题之一;根据最新的市场分析,目前无法访问近400万比特币(BTC)。这些硬币中有很多属于加密货币投资者,他们在布置遗产结构之前就去世了。是他们的错还是缺乏像传统金融投资中使用的那样可靠的框架?

在某种程度上,我们可以争辩说,加密货币所有者有义务确保他们的资产被后代继承。然而,忽略加密是一个相对较新的利基市场,监管政策最少的事实也是天真的。此外,这个市场的大部分投资者还处于年轻时期,可能并不认为有必要制定继承计划。

尽管这些论点可能站得住脚,但没有一个可以证明丢失对后代有价值的硬币是正当的。幸运的是,越来越多的加密货币利益相关者开始意识到这个相关问题;根据CrenationInstitute2020年的一项调查,近90%的加密货币所有者担心他们死后会发生什么。在一个一夜之间造就了百万富翁的行业,这或许是正确的觉醒形式。

那么,在继承结构方面,当前市场必须提供什么?在深入研究之前,值得注意的是现有的解决方案分为两种;集中式(托管)和分散式(非托管)。前者依赖第三方存储,而后者则由智能合约基础设施支持。

加密继承该走哪条路?

就加密继承而言,集中式和分散式解决方案都是可行的,这完全取决于一个人的喜好。

中心化

顾名思义,集中式加密继承结构由中介运营,主要是Binance和Coinbase等加密交易所。这意味着加密资产所有者必须在一级交易所之一注册一个账户。如果一个人死亡,继承人可以通过提供一些文件来索取托管的加密资产;例如,Coinbase要求家庭成员提供死亡证明和遗嘱等文件。

虽然与托管人一起存储加密资产可能是一种很好的继承对冲,但这并不能保证遗产最终会涓涓细流。在某些情况下,大型交易所被黑客入侵或倒闭,使客户陷入困境。此外,法规中迫在眉睫的不确定性意味着监管机构可以通过直接针对交易所轻松没收加密收益。

去中心化

在核心,加密精神基于去中心化(用户应该完全控制他们的数字资产)。这就是为什么像Metamask这样的非托管钱包每月拥有超过1000万活跃用户(MAU)的原因。然而,直到最近,还没有适当的结构来传递存储在非托管平台中的加密资产。唯一的选择是共享一个人的私钥或与公证人一起存储信息。

如今,情况已不再如此,加密顽固分子现在可以选择通过像SerenityShield这样的去中心化应用程序(DApp)创建一个继承保险箱。该DApp通过SecretNetwork的隐私功能对用户的账户信息进行加密,然后将其分成三个独特的NFT片段。第一个NFT由所有者持有,第二个由继承人持有,而最后一块拼图存储在Serenity的智能合约保险库中。

根据Serenity的公共关系负责人CandiceBaudet的说法,去中心化保险箱在加密继承和防止私钥丢失方面都改变了游戏规则,“SerenityShield的解决方案不仅允许非托管钱包所有者通过确保其绝对安全来避免丢失其私钥,而且还可以将它们转移给他们的继承人。它建立在SecretNetwork区块链之上,并基于分配给所有者、Serenity保险库及其指定继承人的NFT的使用,是安全、去中心化和透明的。”

结论

加密货币已经走了很长一段路,它们将继续存在,现在市值超过1.3万亿美元。在这种情况下,该市场的参与者在各个方面制定长期解决方案才是明智之举。更重要的是,市场需要可靠的遗产结构和政策;集中式和分散式。正如本文所强调的,有几个即将推出的选择,这完全取决于投资者的偏好和他们在任何时候的市场需求。

Lecturas Relacionadas

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

Hiring in Crypto: Balancing Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent As the crypto industry grows, founders face the dilemma of whether to prioritize hiring professionals with blockchain experience or those with traditional tech backgrounds who can learn. The key is recognizing that crypto companies are still tech companies at their core and should apply proven hiring best practices. Crypto-native talent offers immediate productivity and is essential for roles involving high-stakes, specialized work like smart contract development, where errors can be catastrophic. However, traditional professionals from large-scale software companies bring valuable experience in scaling products, operational flexibility, and expertise in areas like fintech, UX, and security, which are crucial as crypto products target mainstream adoption. Recruiting requires tailored approaches. Some candidates may be hesitant due to crypto's volatility or complexity, while others are excited by its innovative potential. Assess candidates' motivations, curiosity, and alignment with the company's vision early. Emphasize the opportunity to shape technology's future and address financial incentives, such as token-based compensation, which can offer liquidity compared to traditional equity. Onboarding is critical. Identify knowledge gaps during hiring and design education programs, mentorship, knowledge-sharing sessions, and resources like blogs or courses to accelerate learning. Pairing new hires with experienced crypto professionals helps bridge gaps and fosters collaboration. Ultimately, successful teams blend both crypto-native and traditional talent, leveraging their strengths to drive innovation and growth.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

On April 19, a major DeFi security breach occurred, resulting in the loss of approximately $292 million. The attack targeted Kelp DAO’s rsETH bridge contract built on LayerZero, with 116,500 rsETH stolen. The attacker initiated the exploit using funds from Tornado Cash and manipulated the LayerZero EndpointV2 contract to transfer the assets. Kelp DAO confirmed the incident and temporarily paused rsETH contracts across multiple networks while collaborating with security experts for investigation. Initial analysis suggests the root cause was a compromised private key on the source chain, with the contract secured by only a 1/1 validator set, making it vulnerable to a single malicious transaction. The attacker used the stolen rsETH as collateral on lending platforms—including Aave, Compound, and Euler—to borrow more liquid assets like WETH, accumulating over $236 million in debt. Aave alone accounted for $196 million of this amount. In response, Aave froze its rsETH markets and stated it would explore covering potential bad debt through its Umbrella safety module, which holds around $50 million in WETH. This incident follows another large exploit earlier in April, where Drift Protocol on Solana lost $280 million. The repeated high-value attacks raise concerns about DeFi security, even affecting major protocols like Aave. Users are advised to exercise caution, diversify holdings, and limit exposure to on-chain protocols until more robust security measures are established.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片