Пьеро Чиполлоне: Цифровой евро подорвет монополию международных платежных гигантов США и Китая

investing.ruPublicado a 2024-09-04Actualizado a 2024-09-04

В интервью с Le Monde Пьеро Чиполлоне (Piero Cipollone) рассказал, что ЕЦБ намерен противостоять влиянию международных платежных гигантов, таких как Mastercard (NYSE:MA) и Alipay. Чтобы снизить зависимость Европы от сторонних платежных сервисов, ЕЦБ активно работает над практическими аспектами внедрения цифрового евро, задуманного как электронная форма наличных денег для упрощения цифровых платежей.

«Европейским платежным системам и компаниям сложно конкурировать на международной арене. Например, покупка билетов на чемпионат Европы по футболу 2024 года целиком зависела от американских и китайских платежных решений, таких как Mastercard и Alipay. Это одна из причин, по которой ЕЦБ работает над цифровым евро для снижения зависимости Европы от иностранных платежных инфраструктур», — сказал Чиполлоне.

Он добавил, что успешная интеграция цифрового евро в экономику Евросоюза позволит решить проблему фрагментации финансовых и товарных рынков по национальному признаку. Таким образом, будут сняты ограничения на финансирование и развитие европейских компаний, что положительно отразится на их способности конкурировать на международном уровне.

В начале года Пьеро Чиполлоне рассказал о подготовке к запуску цифрового евро, в том числе о высочайших стандартах приватности для цифровой валюты. Выступая перед комитетом Европарламента по экономическим и валютным вопросам, член исполнительного совета ЕЦБ подчеркнул, что жители Евросоюза смогут свободно и безопасно пользоваться цифровым евро.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Bits.media

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bittensor's Intellectual Arbitrage Trap: Capital Only Speculates on Tokens, Quality AI Goes Unpaid

The article critiques the inherent flaws in the Bittensor network's decentralized AI incentive model. While designed to use TAO tokens to reward AI development across specialized subnets (like model training or data crawling), the system prioritizes capital flow over genuine utility. A subnet's reward allocation is primarily determined by the price of its native Alpha token, creating a self-reinforcing loop where buying pressure begets more rewards, detached from the actual quality or real-world adoption of the AI services. Critical vulnerabilities are exposed: the scoring mechanism for AI outputs can be gamed if a majority of validators collude, and "score copying" among validators is possible. The network's value is anchored to speculative trading rather than verified user demand or revenue. Despite these issues, the author acknowledges Bittensor's potential to foster open, distributed AI infrastructure, similar to how past tech bubbles built lasting assets. The pending approval of Bittensor ETFs could bring both significant capital and necessary regulatory scrutiny, potentially forcing the ecosystem to mature and align incentives with tangible value creation.

Foresight NewsHace 30 min(s)

Bittensor's Intellectual Arbitrage Trap: Capital Only Speculates on Tokens, Quality AI Goes Unpaid

Foresight NewsHace 30 min(s)

‘Walled off’ – Hyperliquid, Phantom press CFTC for 3 DeFi demands

Hyperliquid and Solana-based wallet Phantom have urged the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to modernize regulations for decentralized finance (DeFi). In a letter, they made three key requests: first, that non-custodial software developers not be automatically treated as brokers or exchanges; second, that existing no-action relief for self-custodial wallets be formalized into guidance; and third, that the CFTC create a framework allowing regulated entities to use blockchain for trading and settlement. They argue these changes are necessary to prevent stifling innovation and pushing activity offshore. The request responds to a CFTC inquiry on barriers to fintech partnerships. Similar exemptions are under discussion in the proposed CLARITY Act. However, granting these requests could face legal challenges from traditional market participants like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), which has previously sued the CFTC over crypto product approvals. Traditional players argue DeFi platforms should meet the same regulatory standards as conventional exchanges. With the CLARITY Act's future uncertain, any CFTC action on DeFi exemptions may lead to further litigation.

ambcryptoHace 34 min(s)

‘Walled off’ – Hyperliquid, Phantom press CFTC for 3 DeFi demands

ambcryptoHace 34 min(s)

Walsh Is Quietly Reshaping the Federal Reserve Through Five Working Groups

In an effort to subtly reshape the Federal Reserve, Chair Kevin Wash has established five "Chair's Advancement of Monetary Policy" working groups. These groups, led entirely by 15 external experts and supported by Fed staff, cover the entire monetary policy "operating system": data inputs, productivity/employment/inflation models, balance sheet tools, and external communications. The initiative centralizes agenda-setting, knowledge production, data access, and public narrative control under the Chair's office, while formal decision-making power remains with the FOMC and Board. Analysts note this mirrors tactics like China's use of central working groups—bypassing bureaucratic inertia, creating parallel reporting channels, and enabling rapid "top-level design" to reset policy agendas. This suggests Wash may hold off on major policy moves until the groups conclude their studies. Key future questions are whether these groups become permanent and if their conclusions effectively become pre-determined policy for the FOMC to ratify.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Walsh Is Quietly Reshaping the Federal Reserve Through Five Working Groups

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

WEEX TradFi Trading Competition Kicks Off, 50,000 USDT Prize Pool First-Come, First-Served, Open a Position and Get 5 U

WEEX Exchange Launches "TradFi Trading Competition" with a 50,000 USDT Prize Pool Amidst a crypto market downturn, WEEX Exchange highlights the growth of tokenized traditional finance (TradFi) assets as a key trend, allowing users to trade stocks, ETFs, and commodities using crypto. The platform has launched a "TradFi Trading Competition" from July 9th to 23rd, featuring a 50,000 USDT prize pool. The campaign offers three reward tiers: 1. **New User Bonus (25,000 USDT pool):** New users depositing ≥100 USDT, completing a specified spot trade, and one TradFi contract trade (margin ≥10 USDT) receive 200 USDT. 2. **Volume-Based Rewards (20,000 USDT pool):** All users can earn tiered bonuses for achieving TradFi contract trading volumes of 5,000 USDT (3 USDT), 20,000 USDT (10 USDT), and 100,000 USDT (50 USDT). Rewards are stackable. 3. **Participation Reward:** Any user opening a TradFi contract trade during the event receives 5 USDT instantly. The article promotes WEEX's TradFi features, which include trading tokenized shares of companies like NVIDIA and Tesla using USDT, 24/7 trading, fractional share investing starting from $5, and high leverage up to 100x for hedging. It positions these features as solutions to traditional investing barriers like high fees, strict trading hours, and high share prices. The summary concludes by encouraging users to join the competition and leverage WEEX's platform to access global TradFi markets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

WEEX TradFi Trading Competition Kicks Off, 50,000 USDT Prize Pool First-Come, First-Served, Open a Position and Get 5 U

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

Recent months have witnessed a wave of established blockchain projects migrating to new public chains, notably Base and Arbitrum, coupled with strategic pivots in their business models—essentially "re-starting" elsewhere. Examples include Sophon (moving from ZKsync to Base to cut $3M+ annual costs and focus on consumer apps), Moonbeam (shifting from Polkadot to Base to pursue decentralized AI), and Secret Network (planning a move from Cosmos to Arbitrum to explore privacy-AI integrations, though its token price plunged 30% post-announcement). A common thread is that these migrating projects are primarily layer-1 or layer-2 chains now seeking relevance in AI and real-world consumer applications. This trend highlights the relative stagnation of ecosystems like Polkadot and Cosmos, which are seeing significant outflows. However, the community remains skeptical about whether such chain-hopping truly enables a turnaround. Historical cases like y00ts NFTs (which moved from Solana to Polygon and back to Ethereum) and Synthetix (which retreated from a multi-chain strategy) show that migration often fails to deliver expected benefits and can add complexity. In today's more rational market, devoid of easy narrative or airdrop红利, simply changing chains is unlikely to be a silver bullet. For both migrating projects and destination chains, the real challenge lies not in attracting projects but in developing actual use cases that retain users.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片