Ernst&Young: 94% институциональных инвесторов верят в блокчейн и криптовалюты

investing.ruPublicado a 2024-08-30Actualizado a 2024-08-30

Аналитики EY провели опрос среди 277 операционных и генеральных директоров из США, Европы, Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона, Канады и Латинской Америки, чтобы понять их видение цифровых активов и узнать их ожидания по поводу токенизации. В число этих институциональных инвесторов вошли семейные офисы, инвестиционные консультанты и управляющие активами, традиционные хедж-фонды и пенсионные фонды.

Опрос проводился в начале марта, после появления биржевых фондов (ETF) на биткоин в США. В опросе участвовали как компании, уже инвестировавшие в цифровые активы или связанные с ними продукты (криптофонды и криптодеривативы), так и компании без опыта подобных инвестиций.

94% респондентов верят в долгосрочную ценность блокчейна и криптовалют, а 67% уже инвестировали в цифровые активы. 42% участников опроса еще в 2023 году увеличили вложения в криптоактивы и связанные с ними продукты, тогда как 55% планируют увеличить инвестиции в криптовалюты в ближайшие два-три года. 68% крупных компаний-юрлиц инвестируют или планируют инвестировать в биткоин-ETP, а 62% предпочитают получать доступ к криптовалютам через зарегистрированный фонд.

Половина респондентов заинтересованы инвестировать в токенизированные активы, а 31% планируют начать инвестировать в этом или следующем году. При этом 44% респондентов проявили интерес к токенизации собственных активов, из них 22% планируют начать токенизацию в 2024-2025 годах. 37% инвесторов уже выделили средства на покупку криптовалюты, хотя их планы все больше склоняются к инвестированию в криптофонды. Более 90% учреждений оптимистично настроены относительно долгосрочной ценности криптовалют, а более 80% опрошенных считают криптоактивы ключевым инструментом для диверсификации инвестиционного портфеля.

Крупные инвесторы предпочитают инвестировать в BTC (98%) и ETH (75%), на третьем месте — криптовалюта SOL (24%), за ней следует XRP (18%). Исследователи отметили, что XRP становится все более популярным активом среди институционалов, несмотря на судебный процесс между компанией Ripple и Комиссией по ценным бумагам и биржам США (SEC).

В марте гендиректор RocketFuel Blockchain Питер Дженсен (Peter Jensen) рассказал, что крупные компании все чаще используют стейблкоины для совершения международных платежей и расчетов, поскольку транзакции со стейблкоинами гораздо быстрее и дешевле.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Bits.media

Lecturas Relacionadas

Goldman Sachs Bans It, Google Bans It Too: The Gray Zone of Prediction Markets Is Shrinking Fast

Goldman Sachs has updated its personal trading policy, prohibiting employees from trading event contracts on prediction markets involving specific companies (including whether Goldman itself might restructure or initiate acquisitions in a quarter), election outcomes, financial market performance (including Bitcoin prices), macroeconomic data, geopolitical events, and regulatory results for pending M&A deals. Sports and entertainment bets remain allowed. Violations can lead to dismissal or account closure, and the firm may reclaim profits over $200 or donate them to charity. This follows a CFTC case against a Google engineer who allegedly used non-public data to profit $1.2 million on Polymarket. Simultaneously, Google's Chrome Web Store updated its policy, banning extensions that facilitate real-money trading on prediction market outcomes, effective August 1, 2026. While not affecting platforms' websites or mobile apps directly, this restricts a key user access channel. These actions occur amid growing regulatory pressure on prediction markets. The CFTC is investigating Polymarket for alleged misconduct, and a consumer group has filed a lawsuit. Over 30 countries, including Argentina, have blocked access. Despite this, trading volume has hit record highs, and major investments continue, such as ICE's $2 billion stake in Polymarket. The core debate remains whether prediction markets are financial instruments or gambling. CFTC argues for federal oversight as derivatives, while some states seek to regulate them under gambling laws. Multiple fronts—federal probes, political pressure, internal corporate bans, and platform restrictions—are narrowing the operational space for these markets.

Foresight NewsHace 6 min(s)

Goldman Sachs Bans It, Google Bans It Too: The Gray Zone of Prediction Markets Is Shrinking Fast

Foresight NewsHace 6 min(s)

Robinhood Chain Goes Viral in One Week: Memes Bring Traffic, Stablecoins Boost TVL

Robinhood Chain, a new Arbitrum-based Layer 2 blockchain, has seen explosive growth in its first week. This surge was driven by a combination of viral memecoin trading and a major stablecoin deposit, though the latter contributes the most to its Total Value Locked (TVL). Active addresses soared from near zero to nearly 200,000, with daily DEX volume peaking at nearly $400 million. The integration of the Solana-based launchpad Pump.fun significantly lowered the barrier for memecoin trading, fueling activity with tokens like CASHCAT, which saw a 1320% price surge. Contrary to the public focus on memes, the primary driver of the chain's TVL, which reached approximately $234 million, was a ~$50 million deposit of Ethena's USDG stablecoin into the Morpho lending protocol. This single event caused a 160% TVL increase. Morpho underpins Robinhood's Earn product, offering yield on stablecoins. While the chain was originally launched with a focus on tokenized Real-World Assets (RWAs), this segment remains a minor part of the ecosystem at around $12.8 million. The initial growth is thus characterized by speculative memecoin trading and yield-seeking stablecoin deposits, while its core RWA narrative is still in early development.

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Robinhood Chain Goes Viral in One Week: Memes Bring Traffic, Stablecoins Boost TVL

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Tsinghua AI Mathematician Emerges: From Intuition to Theorem, Contributing to an 84-Page Quantum Algorithm Paper

Tsinghua University’s Intelligent Industry Research Institute (AIR) has developed an AI mathematician agent named AIM, designed not just to solve math problems but to actively participate in early-stage research. In a recent study, researchers collaborated with AIM to develop "Sign Embedding Quantum Algorithms," resulting in an 84-page paper on quantum algorithms for matrix equations and functions. The research began with a human researcher's intuition: can rational approximation serve as a design principle for quantum algorithms? AIM helped expand this idea into multiple candidate research directions. Human researchers then filtered and focused on the most promising path. AIM assisted in organizing theorems, generating proof drafts, and performing complexity analysis, while humans maintained oversight, auditing assumptions and refining derivations. This case illustrates a human-AI collaborative workflow: AI rapidly explores and expands research avenues, generates draft materials, and aids in checking derivations; human researchers provide critical judgment on direction, value, and validity. The process emphasizes "high-throughput candidate generation + human value gating + AI-assisted audit and repair + human final integration." The resulting quantum algorithm framework offers a unified approach to several matrix problems, advancing quantum linear algebra under more general conditions. This work suggests AI's role in theoretical research is evolving from task-specific assistance to supporting the entire research lifecycle—enhancing exploration and efficiency while keeping human expertise central to guiding inquiry and ensuring rigor. *Paper & System Links:* - AIM application report: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24899 - Quantum algorithm paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25333 - AIM repository: https://github.com/TheoryFoundry/AIMv2

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Tsinghua AI Mathematician Emerges: From Intuition to Theorem, Contributing to an 84-Page Quantum Algorithm Paper

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Short-Lived Meme Mania: Can It Be the Icebreaker for Robinhood's RWA Narrative?

Robinhood recently launched its own Layer 2 network, Robinhood Chain, built on Arbitrum and focusing on tokenized stocks, RWA, DeFi, and AI finance. Shortly after launch, a meme coin called CASHCAT, named after an early unused Robinhood brand, surged in popularity, achieving a market cap near $150 million and high daily trading volume. It gained traction through third-party DEXs and launchpads like Uniswap and Noxa.fun, bypassing Robinhood's official listing process. This highlights a key feature of the permissionless chain: even assets not officially approved can achieve significant liquidity and trading activity. While CASHCAT currently dominates the chain's meme coin sector, its high turnover indicates speculative trading. The rapid proliferation of new meme coins risks dispersing liquidity. Meanwhile, the chain's core RWA sector remains relatively small at $12.5 million. CEO Vlad Tenev has expressed that the chain is well-suited for both RWA and meme coins. In the optimistic scenario, meme-driven activity could bootstrap the chain's user base and liquidity for its long-term RWA vision. However, if the meme frenzy fades quickly, the RWA narrative may struggle to gain traction independently. The incident demonstrates that on a permissionless platform, the market itself can create major assets, offering Robinhood a potential new growth avenue beyond its core crypto business as it navigates the long-term development of the tokenized asset market.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Short-Lived Meme Mania: Can It Be the Icebreaker for Robinhood's RWA Narrative?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

The Fall of Zapper: A Post-Mortem of a DeFi Pioneer In July 2026, Zapper, a once-dominant DeFi portfolio tracker, announced its shutdown. Born in 2020 from a merger, Zapper capitalized on the DeFi Summer boom, reaching 2 million monthly users and processing over $13B in transactions, backed by $16.5M in funding from investors like Framework Ventures and Coinbase Ventures. Its core "Zap" feature simplified complex multi-step DeFi operations. Despite its early success, Zapper failed to build a sustainable business model. Revenue from DEX aggregation was minimal due to fierce competition, while maintaining its multi-chain data infrastructure was costly. Furthermore, the DeFi landscape shifted: capital consolidated around top protocols, reducing the need for complex portfolio tracking across numerous platforms. Zapper's user base and core demand eroded. The company attempted multiple pivots, including an NFT-based points system, a social app (Chainchat), and plans for a ZAP token protocol. However, these initiatives—often focused on creating new, speculative C端需求 rather than solving existing pain points—ultimately failed. Critics argue Zapper remained trapped in a "blockchain purist" mindset, prioritizing costly, non-revenue-generating features over its competitive DEX aggregator. Unlike competitor DeBank, which successfully pivoted to its Rabby Wallet, Zapper lacked a diversified revenue stream. Its closure highlights the peril for tooling projects that fail to adapt to market shifts and monetize effectively, serving as a cautionary tale for the industry.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot