前FTX高管Ryan Salame指控美国政府在司法部指控其合伙人后违背了承诺

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-23Actualizado a 2024-08-23

币界网报道:

前FTX高管Ryan Salame表示,美国政府已经违背了不起诉其合伙人Michelle Bond的承诺。

Salame是破产加密货币交易所巴哈马子公司FTX Digital Markets的前联合首席执行官。

去年,这位前高管承认犯有共谋非法政治捐款和欺诈联邦选举委员会的罪行,以及共谋经营无牌汇款业务的罪行。今年5月,一名法官判处Salame 7.5年监禁,他将于10月向监狱报到。

但Salame表示,他与政府达成协议并认罪,以阻止对其孩子的母亲、前国会候选人Michelle Bond的进一步调查。

周四,纽约南区联邦检察官达米安·威廉姆斯宣布对邦德提出指控,指控她涉嫌违反与2022年竞选国会失败有关的竞选财务规定。

威廉姆斯在一份起诉书中说,Salame从FTX组织了一笔虚假的40万美元付款给邦德,据称邦德用这笔钱资助了她的竞选活动。

在一份新的法庭文件中,萨拉姆的律师声称,政府利用这位前首席执行官的认罪协商来威胁邦德。

“为了促使Salame认罪,政府律师表示,如果Salame认罪的话,他们将停止调查Bond。考虑到Salame明显希望保护Bond,Salame同意签订认罪协议作为回应。然而,政府没有遵守其诺言,最近恢复了对Bond的调查,并对她提起诉讼。在本巡回法院,当被告根据检察官的承诺进行认罪时,“必须履行这样的承诺。”

Salame首先要求法院驳回对Bond的起诉,但如果不这样做,就驳回对他的定罪。

不要错过任何一个节拍-订阅以直接将电子邮件提醒发送到您的收件箱查看价格行动在X、Facebook和Telegram上关注我们冲浪每日Hodl Mix

生成的图像:Midjourney

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Invisible Force in Bitcoin's Bear Market: Accelerating On-Chain Payments and Institutional Adoption

Amidst ongoing Bitcoin price volatility, the quiet acceleration of on-chain payments and tokenized trading holds significant importance for investors and policymakers, especially with legislation like the CLARITY Act on the horizon. Major traditional financial institutions adopting these technologies are driving crucial discussions on compliance, security, and transparency, which are vital for broader market adoption. Key developments are shaping this evolution. First, blockchain traceability is moving beyond a simple "public vs. private" debate. New frameworks aim to standardize how financial data from immutable ledgers is analyzed and interpreted, making it as crucial as standardized financial reporting for building institutional trust. Second, while traditional finance supports clear digital asset regulation, they emphasize that an asset's economic function should dictate its regulatory treatment, advocating for robust consumer protections over broad exemptions. Furthermore, the growth of on-chain deposits at regulated institutions signals a shift. Major banks are leveraging blockchain not to replace but to upgrade existing services—like deposits and cross-border settlements—with benefits like 24/7 operations and programmable treasury management. This trend focuses more on modernizing financial infrastructure than creating speculative assets. Despite market turbulence, these underlying advancements in on-chain infrastructure point toward a more robust foundation for the industry's future.

Foresight NewsHace 13 min(s)

The Invisible Force in Bitcoin's Bear Market: Accelerating On-Chain Payments and Institutional Adoption

Foresight NewsHace 13 min(s)

Crypto Payment Cards with $1.5 Billion Monthly Transaction Volume, Stuck in the 1990s

Monthly crypto payment card transaction volume has reached $15 billion, but the industry's development stage is comparable to debit cards in the 1990s, before they became a mainstream financial staple. A key limitation is the lack of established daily financial relationships, such as direct salary deposits and recurring bill payments, with crypto wallets. Despite annualized transaction volumes of approximately $18 billion, the market is concentrated and immature. The leading provider, RedotPay, commands over half the market share. User adoption is heavily skewed towards emerging markets like Bangladesh, India, and Nigeria, where access to USD and stable financial services is limited, rather than developed economies. The sector features four primary business models: 1) Card-issuing infrastructure providers, 2) Exchange-affiliated cards for user retention, 3) Decentralized wallet/DeFi cards with self-custody but high complexity, and 4) Stablecoin-focused digital banks, which dominate transaction volume by offering integrated financial services. The article argues that a pure payment functionality is insufficient for long-term success, mirroring the historical trajectory of traditional debit cards. Future winners will need to: 1) Control the upstream flow of funds, 2) Secure defensible niches in underserved markets, and 3) Most crucially, build core account relationships that integrate into users' daily financial lives. Without this evolution, crypto cards risk remaining niche prepaid tools rather than becoming universal financial infrastructure.

Foresight NewsHace 43 min(s)

Crypto Payment Cards with $1.5 Billion Monthly Transaction Volume, Stuck in the 1990s

Foresight NewsHace 43 min(s)

$7.8 Billion in Theft and Losses Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become an Unavoidable Liquidity Tax for DeFi

"7.8 Billion in Thefts Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become DeFi's Unavoidable 'Liquidity Tax'" A summary of Q2 2026 data reveals that security risks are now a fundamental capital cost in DeFi, directly impacting user returns and liquidity decisions. DeFiLlama recorded 88 hacking incidents with quantified losses totaling $780.3 million in Q2. April was the worst month with $644.8 million lost. DeFi protocol attacks accounted for $735.8 million, while cross-chain bridge exploits resulted in $354.4 million in losses (note: some event categorizations overlap). Cumulatively, DeFi hacks have reached $7.85 billion, with bridge losses at $3.26 billion. The quarter highlighted two primary risk categories: high-value infrastructure vulnerabilities (e.g., bridges, oracles, admin keys) causing massive single losses, and more frequent contract logic bugs. This signals a critical market shift: from post-incident analysis to preemptive pricing of risk. Users and liquidity providers now implicitly factor in the security of the entire asset pathway—not just pool APY—into their decisions. This hidden "risk premium" manifests through wider spreads, higher liquidity incentives, and capital migration towards perceived safer routes. Cross-chain bridge risks, responsible for over $353 million in Q2 losses, exemplify this change. Asset routing credibility is now part of the transaction. Following incidents like KelpDAO and THORChain, markets are demanding safer bridges, asset insurance, and clearer risk disclosure, increasing the cost of capital for riskier pathways. Consequently, security spending is transforming from a defensive cost into a core distribution cost for attracting liquidity. Protocols must invest more in audits, bug bounties, real-time monitoring, and insurance to remain competitive. Users are increasingly demanding transparency about fund flow paths, associated risks, and contingency plans. The key indicators for the industry's direction will be whether capital continues consolidating in trusted channels, if projects delay launches for enhanced audits, if insurance premiums rise, and if aggregators start displaying security risk metrics. Q2 2026 may be remembered not just as a bad period, but as the point when DeFi underwent a fundamental asset risk repricing, where security became a persistent,隐性 tax on all on-chain activity.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

$7.8 Billion in Theft and Losses Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become an Unavoidable Liquidity Tax for DeFi

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片