SkyBridge创始人：加密货币选民可能会让哈里斯输掉美国大选

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-22Actualizado a 2024-08-22

币界网报道：

嘉宾： Anthony Scaramucci，SkyBridge 创始人

主持人：Giovanni Pigni，Cointelegraph 视频报道记者

播客源：Cointelegraph

原标题：Will the U.S. Elections Trigger the Next Crypto Bull Run?

播出日期：2024年8月20日

背景信息

本期 SkyBridge Capital 创始人 Anthony Scaramucci 解释了为什么特朗普在美国大选中的胜利不会使加密行业受益，以及 Kamala Harris 如何通过忽视支持加密的选民来危及她的机会。

谁在加密货币市场中是更合适的候选人，特朗普还是哈里斯？

Anthony表示，尽管他对特朗普持批评态度，但从加密行业的角度来看，行业普遍认为特朗普是更好的候选人。
然而，Anthony指出，行业在这一选择上忽视了许多需要谨慎考虑的因素。
他进一步分析了特朗普的政策意图，认为特朗普希望改变美国的体制，削弱司法和立法机构，加强行政权力，这可能导致寡头统治的局面。他警告说，这种变化可能会削弱资本市场以及美国在全球的地位。尽管特朗普可能会推出一些积极的加密货币政策，但也可能导致世界的巨大混乱。
相较之下，Anthony认为拜登政府在经济上表现良好，尽管他对政府反对加密货币的立场表示不满，但他仍然认为拜登政府在法律尊重方面是值得肯定的。他提到，随着比特币进入获得官方 ETF 的领域，如果哈里斯当选，关于加密货币的监管将会有很大进展。
最后，Anthony强调，他相信在哈里斯的领导下，比特币会表现良好，世界也会变得更好，因此他决定支持哈里斯。

哈里斯与加密行业合作的尝试，是否被视为“骗局”？

主持人提到，许多加密行业的人士对民主党在加密货币政策上的转变并不抱有信心。他提到，联邦储备在8月9日对美国少数几家支持加密货币的银行进行了打压，Tyler Winklevoss 表示，民主党试图展现的加密重置实际上是一场骗局，暗示哈里斯的总统任期将继续反对加密货币的政策。

Anthony表示他认为 Tyler 在这一问题上是正确的。他承认这让他感到沮丧，但他并不是单一议题的选民，更关心的是更广泛的影响。他指出，尽管拜登政府的强硬态度，加密货币行业依然表现良好。他强调自己在推动积极的监管改革和结束类似“操作窒息点2.0”的活动方面所做的努力。
Anthony向听众表示，Tyler 的观点是有道理的，如果有人选择支持特朗普，他能够理解这个决定，但他自己不会支持特朗普，因为他了解特朗普的危险性。他希望能够推动加密货币的概念和监管实现两党合作，因为他认为这将更有利于行业的发展。他坚持自己的观点，认为这种双边合作是必要的。

你相信特朗普的比特币储备计划吗？

Anthony对此表示肯定，认为如果特朗普确实实施这一计划，将会是一个非常好的想法。他赞扬特朗普身边有许多聪明的人士，如 David Bailey 等，为他提供建议。他提到自己听过特朗普在比特币大会上的演讲，认为演讲内容相当不错。
Anthony设想，如果美国能够拥有一到三百万个比特币，并将其作为战略资产储备列入国债表上，这将是一个极具智慧的举措。他强调，如果这些比特币的价值达到数十万美元，想象一下这一计划的潜在价值和影响。

加密货币选民能在美国选举中产生影响吗？

Anthony进一步分析，如果副总统哈里斯在选举中失利，事后分析将可能指出，她在加密货币行业的立场是失利的原因之一，因为她低估了拥有加密货币的人数。他提到，美国大约有5000万人持有加密货币，其中许多人可能是单一议题的选民。
他提出了一个假设，即：即使只有2500万人拥有加密货币，如果其中5%是单一议题的选民，这也意味着有125万人可能在摇摆州投票。如果这些选民在摇摆州投票，哈里斯可能会因此失去选举。Anthony 强调，民主党对加密货币采取负面策略是一个明显的信号，他正在努力推动一些支持哈里斯的人士倾听加密货币行业的声音，以期改变她的政策方向，但他对她是否愿意这样做表示不确定。

美国选举会引发下一轮加密牛市吗？

Anthony对此表示，首先要回顾一下比特币的发展历程。他提到，自比特币诞生以来，第一次在减半之前达到了历史最高点。此外，在这次减半前还引入了ETF（交易所交易基金）。减半后，每天的比特币产量从900个减少到450个，这对市场造成了卖压。此外，他提到 Mt. Gox 破产事件期间，大约有90亿美元的比特币在短时间内被抛售。
他认为，尽管面临这些卖压，但比特币仍然能够在60000美元附近交易，这表明市场的健康状况。他预测，三个月后比特币可能会达到100000美元，并解释说，Mt. Gox 的卖压和美国及德国政府的抛售压力已经消失，加上市场对ETF的积极反应，这些都是推动比特币上涨的重要因素。
Anthony最后总结说，虽然选举可能成为一个催化剂，但他认为真正的催化剂是市场上缺乏卖家，特别是在 Mt. Gox 和政府抛售之后，这将是推动比特币价格上涨的关键因素。

你目前看好哪些加密项目？

Anthony表达了他对几个项目的看法，提到他持有的资产包括：
- Bitcoin - 作为加密货币的领头羊，Anthony 对比特币的长期前景持乐观态度。
- Ethereum - 作为智能合约平台，以太坊在去中心化应用（dApps）和DeFi（去中心化金融）领域具有重要地位。
- Solana- Anthony 表示他对 Solana 的投资，可能是因为其高性能和低交易费用。
- Algorand - 他也持有 Algorand，可能看重其技术和应用潜力。
- Avalanche - Anthony 对 Avalanche 团队表示高度尊重，并持有较大头寸。
- Vulgar Forge - 这是一个游戏代币，Anthony 在其中持有小额头寸。
他总结说，他的主要投资集中在比特币和 Solana 上，表明这些项目在他眼中具有较大的潜力和价值。

我们何时能看到美国批准 Solana 交易所交易基金（ETF）？

Anthony对 Solana 是否会成为下一个获得批准的交易所交易基金（ETF）进行了分析，主要观点如下：
- SEC的立场：Anthony 指出，美国证券交易委员会（SEC）将 Solana 视为一种证券，这使得将其纳入 ETF 变得复杂。在美国，单一证券无法被直接纳入 ETF，但可以将多个证券组合在一起。
- 以太坊的例子：他提到，如果以太坊被认定为非证券，那么为什么 Solana 会被视为证券？这种不一致性让行业感到困惑，并批评当前监管机构的双重标准。
- 未来的监管变化：Anthony 认为，随着美国选举的进行，现有的 SEC 监管人员可能会被更支持行业的监管者取代，这将有助于推动 Solana ETF 的批准。如果特朗普赢得选举，他认为 Solana ETF 有很大机会在明年第一季度获得批准。
- 长期展望：即使在特朗普输掉选举的情况下，Anthony 仍然相信到 2025 年底，Solana ETF 仍有可能获得批准，因为他认为行业会在法律上胜诉，而现有的监管行为不公平。
总的来说，Anthony对 Solana ETF 的未来持乐观态度，但他也承认具体的批准时间仍然不确定，可能会受到政治和监管环境的影响。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros