如何看待Optimism欺诈证明的安全问题?

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-08-20Actualizado a 2024-08-20

Resumen

OP Foundation 提出要硬分叉修复问题,并将其转为受许可证明。

原文作者:Haotian

最近,@Optimism 由于 Fault Proof System 出现安全审计问题遭到了海外社区的质疑。原本无许可的欺诈证明的机制,在被发现重大安全问题后,OP Foundation 竟然提出要硬分叉修复问题,并将其转为受许可证明?具体怎么回事呢?

1)简单而言:Fault Proof System 是一种用于验证 Layer 2 网络状态正确性的机制,任何人可以无许可向 L1 上的纠纷虚拟机提交 L2 状态,并接受他人的挑战,如果挑战成功则会触发奖惩机制。

这就是 OP-Rollup 机制确保安全性而必须存在的欺诈证明机制。6 月份 Fault Proof System 的上线算是弥补了一直以来市场对 OP Stack 缺乏有效挑战机制的诟病问题。

2)不过,最近一次社区驱动的审计发现了该欺诈证明系统的多个漏洞,Optimism 基金会的反应却让人大跌眼镜:

1、将欺诈证明 VM opcode 级别的漏洞视为小安全漏洞;

2、把欺诈证明系统排除在了外部审计范围之内;

3、暂时将欺诈证明的无许可调整为许可机制,并提出一项名为 Granite 的硬分叉计划来解决安全问题;

如此这般,让人不得不怀疑所谓 Fault Proof System 存在意义和有效性,

3)如何看待这件事呢?在我看来:

1、Optimism 推出 Fault Proof System 完全是为了进一步扩大 OP Stack 阵营所进行的必要的安全挑战机制,市场对 Optimism 本身是否存在这样的挑战机制已经「乐观化」了;

2、Fault Proof System 确实构造精密复杂,大部分状态可在 L2 本地进行校验,只把一些关键部分推送给 L1 的故障虚拟机来裁夺,没错是开发了特定 op code 的虚拟机,这样做既可以确保 L1 验证的低成本同时又能确保安全性;

3、Fault Proof System 从无许可调成许可,并被紧急禁用也暴露了 OP 基金会和多签安全委员会的过多权利,欺诈证明即使无许可也在安全委员会的控制之下;

4、Optimism 实现 Stage 1 的安全和去中心化目标至少相比同阵营的 Arbitrum 掉队了,ZK-Rollup 在技术上的领先优势会进一步得到重视。

Lecturas Relacionadas

The US Stock Market in 2026, It's Almost Too Easy, and That Makes Me Nervous

The U.S. stock market's performance in 2026, particularly in the semiconductor memory sector, has generated significant returns that make some investors uneasy. A popular sentiment contrasts the perceived skill required for success in China's A-shares with the apparent ease of profiting from simply holding U.S. stocks. The primary driver is a global memory chip boom. Stocks like Micron, Seagate, Western Digital, and especially SanDisk (spinning off from WDC in 2025) have skyrocketed, with some gains exceeding 500% or even 2200%. Korean giants Samsung and SK Hynix, dominating their domestic index, have also surged. This rally is fueled by an AI-driven demand surge for memory like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory), critical for AI chips. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft are placing massive, "unpriced" orders, while analysts continuously upgrade forecasts. SK Hynix reported its 2026 HBM capacity is already sold out. Despite record profits and sky-high margins (e.g., SK Hynix's 72% operating margin), major memory manufacturers are deliberately restricting capital expenditure and capacity expansion, controlling over 90% of DRAM supply. This supply discipline sustains high prices but draws parallels to cartel behavior. The situation presents two narratives. The bullish case sees AI demand as a structural, long-term shift with a prolonged supply gap. The bearish case, exemplified by short-seller Citron's failed bet against SanDisk, warns of a classic commodity cycle where prices eventually crash rapidly, as seen historically. The irony is noted: while retail investors marvel at easy gains, insiders like Western Digital are selling SanDisk shares at a 25% discount. Ultimately, the high cost of memory in consumer devices feeds into the record profits of memory companies and the soaring stock prices, leading many to question the sustainability of a market where making money seems "as easy as breathing."

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

The US Stock Market in 2026, It's Almost Too Easy, and That Makes Me Nervous

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片