别用简单“牛熊”判断加密市场,关注流动性和供应的变化

深潮Publicado a 2024-08-15Actualizado a 2024-08-15

随着流动性的增加,未来 6-18 个月我们将进入轮动领域。

作者:Rancune

编译:深潮 TechFlow

这可能是我迄今为止最重要的帖子之一。许多人可能会错过"牛市"。你会吗?这里的许多人都非常线性地思考,只考虑熊市或牛市 - 一维的;价格要么上涨要么下跌。长期以来,这种观点让我感到不安(请回顾第一条回复中的展示a)。今天,我提出了一个新的概念模型,我相信这个模型:

a)为周期提供了一个全新的视角,

b)帮助我们更好地理解当前的情况,

c)是可操作的。

维度

系统中的流动性 | 加密货币比传统金融更难获取,在效率、入金、稳定币、中心化交易所可及性等方面都不够成熟。特别是现在,比特币和以太坊有传统金融的护栏,但这些护栏并没有向下传导,游戏规则已经改变。

代币的稀缺性 | 供应是加密货币的一个主要因素;它决定了可获得的流动性必须分散的分母。这与传统金融不同,在传统金融中,代币数量自然受限,通常需要IPO,而不是在Twitter Space上听到一个词就急于去Pumpfun。

根据我的理论,我们在2021年从低流动性和低供应飙升到高流动性和低供应("牛市盛宴")。之后,我们崩溃了,最终在2022年陷入"熊市荒原"。许多人称之为熊市,低供应和低流动性。熊市荒原和牛市盛宴的相似之处在于,由于供应量低,代币一致上涨(或下跌)。市场在移动,不一定是叙事在移动(尽管它们显然存在,但通常比我们当前的15分钟元叙事持续时间长得多)。

从FTX造成的损害和FTX的清算对生态系统的影响中缓慢恢复,流动性略微增加,但代币供应量增加更多。容易成为猎物的人退出了游戏,留下经验丰富(和恶意的)参与者,他们的提取基础设施已经建立并到位,可以提取更多。

从2023年开始,我们进入了"消耗竞技场",在这里我们无法从更高的流动性中受益,因为代币供应呈指数级增长。这真的是适者生存;最有技能的人(或与最好的人脉/最多内部信息的人)获胜。其他人则成为接盘侠。

我们经常将代币增长归因于Pumpfun和Solana垃圾币,这显然是真的,但不仅限于此。还包括无用的L1、L2、rollups、AI协议、桥等的数量之多。显然我们需要所有东西的分叉,我们绝对需要更多没有有机交易量、由风投资助的L2。这是我在展示b和c中写过的内容。

根据我的经验,每次我们在加密货币领域扩张时,接下来都会有一个收缩阶段。无论是在山寨币还是迷因币中,都会出现向优质资产的转移。

随着流动性的增加,我对未来6-18个月的预期是我们将进入轮动领域。我们将从增加的流动性中获得一些利益,但只限于特定的叙事和操作。大多数持有人将继续持有他们停滞不前或缓慢流血的代币,直到永远,在比特币往返6位数后回顾并思考:我是不是错过了?

我们不会再有2021年后每个人都联想到"牛市"的那种牛市盛宴了。这是不可能的,因为代币发行者的技能已经成熟(无论是你最喜欢的PF连环诈骗者还是试图从另一个元叙事中提取流动性的风投)。

但是,如何在轮动领域中操作呢?我将在下一篇文章中深入探讨这个问题。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手Hace 12 min(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手Hace 12 min(s)

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

The article investigates Sam Altman's personal wealth strategy, centered around his investments in approximately 400 companies while serving as OpenAI's CEO. Despite not holding direct equity in OpenAI, Altman has built a vast portfolio, with at least 10 of his investments having commercial ties or ongoing negotiations with OpenAI. This creates a complex network of potential conflicts of interest, drawing scrutiny from U.S. congressional committees and state attorneys general. Key investments highlighted include the anti-aging startup Retro Biosciences (valued at $258 million for his stake as of late last year) and the chipmaker Cerebras, whose value soared following an OpenAI procurement deal. His most significant financial gain is linked to the nuclear fusion company Helion, where a recent funding round reportedly increased his stake's value to at least $4.1 billion. The article details a decade-long relationship between Altman, Helion, and OpenAI, including a controversial non-binding power purchase agreement and Altman's efforts to secure investments from OpenAI and its backer SoftBank for Helion. Other points include internal investigations at Tools for Humanity (developer of Worldcoin) and OpenAI's massive contracts with tech giants like Nvidia. According to Forbes, Altman's net worth is around $3.4 billion, ranking him 1251st globally—a rise of over 1400 places since 2024. OpenAI's board states that Altman's external dealings are transparent and potential conflicts are carefully managed.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片