Confiction Labs推出“暴露证明”,以对抗Web3游戏中不断上升的机器人活动

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-15Actualizado a 2024-08-15

币界网报道:

Web3合作多人射击游戏Riftstorm背后的开发商Confiction Labs推出了一种新的游戏内验证系统,旨在遏制其认为该行业机器人活动增加的情况。

这项名为“曝光证明”的计划将不可替代的代币整合到游戏的传说中,作为区分真正玩家和自动机器人账户的一种方法。

此举发生之际,Web3游戏正在努力解决日益严重的机器人问题,营销平台Cookie3最近的一份报告显示,高达70%的空投奖励都流向了机器人账户。

Confiction Labs最近从Mythic Protocol更名为Confiction Labs,声称其新的验证系统将通过第三方API、大型语言模型和用户提交的数据的组合对用户进行身份验证。

Confiction Labs首席执行官Arief Widhiyasa将暴露证明视为一种安全措施和社区建设工具。Widhiyasa说:“这个系统确保了充满激情和忠诚的社区成员是帮助塑造我们知识产权向前发展的人。”。

根据一份声明,具体来说,allowlist验证过程Proof of of Exposure宣传了一种“深度分析系统”,可以确定最合适的社区成员来推进游戏的故事情节。

随着申请者接受验证过程,得分最高的人将能够访问即将推出的XPSR-24 NFT系列的造币厂,该系列是Confiction Labs的FICT ONE:神秘世界的一部分。

XPSR-24是信念实验室更广泛的“协作娱乐”愿景的一部分,用户通过各种游戏内活动为游戏不断发展的故事情节做出贡献。

然而,对于这种验证系统能否有效解决困扰Web3游戏多年的机器人问题,人们仍然持怀疑态度。

批评者认为,尽管技术复杂,但机器人往往很快适应新的安全措施,使其长期无效。

与此同时,机器人预防服务Jigger报告称,40%的Web3服务用户,包括NFT allowlists和Web3游戏的参与者,已被确定为机器人。

虽然将NFT与游戏知识相结合的想法是创新的,但它是否会成功创建一个无机器人的环境,或者只是增加另一层复杂性,还有待观察。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片