区块链动态2024年8月14日早参考

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-14Actualizado a 2024-08-14

币界网报道:

00:00-09:30

关键词:美国FBI对中本聪相关记录“既不确认也不否认”、Coinbase开始在夏威夷提供加密货币服务、Coinbase高管:加拿大需要彻底改革加密货币监管法规、分析:Mt.Gox债权人的资金偿还或已接近尾声、贝莱德IBIT持仓升至约34.8万枚BTC,ETHA升至约29.4万枚ETH、Solana活跃地址数量在七个月内增长151%、与英国首相有关的Meta广告中有43%是加密货币骗局、高盛集团截至Q2持有超4.1亿美元比特币现货ETF股份、美国政府地址今晨收到0.17666枚BTC转账 价值约1.07万美元、Core Scientific宣布拟发行3.5亿美元可转换优先票据、名义价值约18.57亿美元BTC和ETH期权将于周五到期交割、10x Research:稳定币增发表明机构正向市场注入新资金 若发行趋势持续或将推动比特币上涨、彭博分析师:美国比特币ETF持有的BTC数量有望在10月份超过中本聪

1 . 报道,加密货币交易所 Coinbase 已开始在夏威夷提供加密服务,当地居民现在能在 Coinbase 上购买、出售和管理他们的加密货币,此外还可以使用该交易所质押资产和进行国际资金汇款。

2 . 报道,根据 Arkham Intelligence 的数据,一个可能属于 BitGo 的钱包收到了价值约 20 亿美元的 Mt. Gox 比特币,目前该钱包已将其中大部分资金转移到一个单独的钱包,此举可能预示着 Mt. Gox 债权人的偿还终于接近尾声。在7 月份的大部分时间里,Mt. Gox 一直在将价值数十亿美元的比特币转移到指定的加密货币交易所,包括Bitbank、  Kraken、  Bitstamp 和 SBI VC Trade,这些交易所负责将相关 BTC 分配给 Mt. Gox 债权人。

3 . 报道,贝莱德官方更新现货比特币ETF数据显示,截至8月12日,IBIT市值达 20,554,349,504.61美元,持仓量增长到347,994.5955枚比特币,当前流通股数量为611,040,000份;此外其现货以太坊ETF ETHA截至8月12日市值触及780,328,557.45美元,持仓量增长至293,938.9533枚ETH,流通股数量为38,800,000份。

4 . 报道,据The Block数据显示,Solana活跃地址数量在七个月内增长151%,7月份,该网络的活跃地址数量创下历史新高,达到5433万个,与2024年初的2160万个相比大幅增加。除此之外,该生态的非投票交易也在7月份达到13亿的峰值,这表明链上活动十分活跃。

5 . 报道,Robinhood首席执行官Vlad Tenev强调区块链和代币化的巨大效率优势,Tenev认为金融服务的下一个转型将是越来越多的传统金融产品将进入区块链,在区块链上进行交易和托管。一些观察人士猜测,Robinhood可能会推出稳定币,因为Tenev提到海外人士想要使用美元,而稳定币是实现这一目标的最简单方式。鉴于Robinhood的收入中很大一部分来自利息,这或许是有道理的。

6 . 报道,根据向美国证券交易委员会提交的最新13F表格,总部位于芝加哥的高频交易公司DRW Holdings的风险投资部门DRW Venture Capital披露,其目前持有价值至少1.95亿美元的现货比特币和以太坊ETF,这可能是该公司首次涉足加密现货ETF。 其中超过1.5亿美元的产品为Grayscale Ethereum Trust(ETHE)。此外,ETHE是其第三大持股,仅次于跟踪标准普尔500指数的基金和黄金信托。 该公司对比特币ETF的投资比较分散,持有由Ark和21Shares、Bitwise、BlackRock、Fidelity和Proshares发行的比特币ETF。

7 . 报道,Coinbase加拿大总监Lucas Matheson于8月13日出席区块链未来学家会议,讨论加拿大数字资产监管现状并推广新扩展的Stand With Crypto计划。Matheson认为,尽管加拿大的监管框架已经很健全,但该国仍然需要对加密监管进行现代化改造。Matheson指出,85%的国家将在明年采用全面的数字资产监管框架,并强调公众对话在教育政府官员了解加密货币重要性方面的重要性。Coinbase的加拿大主管总结了Stand With Crypto倡导的长期目标:“坦率地说,加拿大在改变法律方面还有很多工作要做,目标是改变加拿大的法律,以便我们能够增加经济自由并更新加拿大的金融体系。” Matheson在演讲结束时指示观众报名加入该倡导团体。

8 . 报道,英国财政部前成员创立的分析机构Fenimore Harper发现,自英国大选以来,所有基于英国首相Keir Starmer的Meta广告中有43%与加密货币骗局有关。网络犯罪分子在250多个Meta广告中使用了Keir Starmer的深度伪造,旨在骗取受害者加密货币。

9 . 报道,调查记者Dave Troy称,美国联邦调查局(FBI)对其根据《信息自由法案》(FOIA)提出的关于比特币创始人中本聪的信息请求,发出了“Glomar回应”,即“既不确认也不否认”是否存在相关记录。Troy表示,FBI的回应暗示中本聪是一名“third party individual”(第三方个体)。他计划对此上诉,试图获取FBI可能掌握的关于中本聪的信息。 自2008年比特币白皮书发布以来,中本聪的真实身份一直是个谜。尽管一些人推测早期比特币贡献者Hal Finney可能是中本聪,但至今没有确凿证据。类似的FOIA请求在2018年也得到了相同的回应,显示FBI和CIA对比特币创始人的记录态度谨慎。

0f8c9f10bf367b1c2b1308ba8e3110c6

10. 报道,据Farside Investors监测,截至发稿时,美国现货比特币ETF和现货以太坊ETF(8月13日)数据如下: 现货比特币ETF:GBTC净流出2860万美元;BITB净流入1650万美元;ARKB净流出610万美元;EZBC、BTC无资金流入或流出。 现货以太坊ETF:ETHE净流出3100万美元;ETHW、CETH、EZET、ETH无资金流入或流出。

11. 报道,据美国证券交易委员会(SEC)官网,高盛集团(Goldman Sachs)昨日提交的13F文件披露了其截至6月30日的持仓情况,包括多只比特币现货ETF股份: 2.386亿美元iShares Bitcoin Trust(6,991,248股); 7950万美元Fidelity Bitcoin ETF(1,516,302股); 3510万美元Grayscale BTC(660,183股); 5610万美元Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin(940,443股); 830万美元Bitwise Bitcoin ETF(253,961股); 749,469美元WisdomTree Bitcoin(11,773股); 299,900美元ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF(5,000股)。

12. 8月14日消息,据Arkham数据,北京时间今日2:31,一个无明确标记地址向美国政府地址转入0.17666枚BTC,价值约1.07万美元。

13. 8月14日消息,上市比特币矿企Core Scientific周二宣布计划发行至多3.5亿美元的可转换优先票据,这些票据将于2029年到期。此消息公布后第二天,该公司股价(CORZ)下跌了10%以上。这些债券将以非公开发行的方式向合格的机构买家发行,并可能附带一项规定,要求买家额外购买5250万美元的债券。投资者可以选择持有优先的无担保债务直到到期,或者将其转换为股票。利息每半年支付一次。

14. 报道,Deribit数据显示,名义价值约13.77亿美元BTC期权和4.8亿美元ETH期权合约将于周五(8月16日)到期交割;其中BTC的最大痛点价格为60000美元,ETH的最大痛点价格为2650美元。

15. 报道,10x Research在其分析中表示,监控和分析加密货币资金流动对于评估市场状况至关重要,可能是比特币和其他加密货币上行或下行的指标。由于广义货币流动在2024年4月初基本停止,因此预期随后的价格调整。然而,在市场接近底部之际,某些资金流的回升帮助提振了价格。关键因素是监测这些资金流动的可持续性,因为如果没有持续的支撑,反弹往往会失去动力。昨晚,Tether增发10亿美元的USDT(尽管似乎是库存构建,而不是立即发行)。然而,上周早些时候,Tether和Circle发行了近28亿美元稳定币,这表明一些机构投资者正在向加密市场注入新的资金。如果这种发行(不仅仅是铸造)的趋势继续下去,比特币可能会进一步上涨。

16. 8月14日消息,据Decrypt报道,美国比特币ETF持有的BTC数量将很快超过其匿名创始人中本聪(Satoshi Nakamoto)。彭博ETF分析师Eric Balchunas周一在X平台上发布的一张图表显示,目前在美国证券交易所交易的10只现货比特币基金总计持有近100万枚BTC。虽然图表中的数字与当前总数略有偏差(例如,随着本周和上周投资者套现,灰度的比特币ETF的数字货币一直在流失),但估计用不了多久,这些资金总额就会超过中本聪持有的比特币数据。 Balchunas估计,根据当前的累积速度,比特币ETF的总规模将在10月超过中本聪的110万枚比特币,而贝莱德旗下的基金到2025年底将独自位居持有人榜首。然而,值得注意的是,这只是一种理论,一些分析师已经站出来反驳这一论点。但如果这是真的,那么按今天的价格计算,中本聪现在持有价值约670亿美元的加密货币。

17. 报道,据官方消息,Telegram Bot项目Banana Gun宣布已销毁总供应量2%的BANANA代币,价值约860万美元。

18. 报道,据Trader T监测,美国现货比特币ETF昨日净流入3900万美元。

19. 报道,据TraderT监测,美国现货以太坊ETF昨日净流入2500万美元。

Lecturas Relacionadas

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major organizational restructuring, involving a 20% staff reduction (approx. 54 employees) and a division into functional clusters like Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional layers. Co-founder Vitalik Buterin further revealed plans to cut the EF's budget by around 40% over the coming years, aiming to reduce its annual spending rate from about 15% to roughly 5% by 2030, transitioning to an endowment-driven model. This overhaul is seen as a long-overdue correction to the EF's ambiguous role. As Ethereum grew, the foundation faced persistent criticism over ETH sales, perceived lack of execution, and unclear strategy, often becoming a focal point for community frustration amid ETH's price stagnation. The reform aims to redefine the EF's boundaries, narrowing its focus to core protocol research, public goods funding, and ecosystem coordination, while offloading more applied development work to the broader market. Concurrently, ecosystem forces like the newly formed Ethlabs (founded by ex-EF researchers) and other independent groups are stepping in to fill the space, signaling a shift from a centralized model to a more distributed, collaborative ecosystem structure. The move was notably praised by Solana co-founder toly, who viewed a "leaner" EF as potentially more decisive and agile.

Odaily星球日报Hace 25 min(s)

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

Odaily星球日报Hace 25 min(s)

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb explores the distorted economics of AI model pricing, drawing parallels to tax policy. He notes that startups and small teams (under 150 users) enjoy heavily subsidized, fixed-price AI subscriptions (like Claude Code), where the marginal cost of an additional token is effectively zero. This creates a powerful incentive for them to maximize token usage ("token-maxxing") and innovate aggressively with AI automation. In contrast, large enterprises (over 150 users) are forced onto "Enterprise" plans, paying per-token API fees with high (~75%) markups. This acts like a steep "tax" on AI-powered labor, disincentivizing marginal automation and experimental use, and encouraging them to retain more human workers. Haseeb argues this pricing creates a "150-person cliff," a regulatory notch similar to labor laws in France that discourage firms from growing past 50 employees. He predicts the fastest-growing future companies may deliberately cap their headcount at 149 to avoid the punitive enterprise pricing. This would foster an "AI-first" management philosophy obsessed with automation and outsourcing to stay lean. While not intentionally designed, this bifurcated pricing could become one of the most influential de facto tax policies, shaping how AI replaces labor—not through mass layoffs at big firms, but through agile, AI-native startups outcompeting them.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

xBubble: Addressing the Structural Gap in the VC-Backed OPC Economy The concept of OPC (One Person Company) is evolving from a buzzword to a significant AI-driven market. While AI coding tools like Replit and Lovable have validated demand from non-technical users wanting to build applications, a key gap remains: the leap from creating a demo to running a stable, evolving business. These tools still require users to manage the development process, including technical judgments for integrations, modifications, and deployments—a major hurdle for OPCs. xBubble, by DAPPOS, tackles this by shifting from "Prompt-to-Code" to "SOP-to-Business." Instead of generating code from instructions, its core is a system of pre-organized SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) that translate business goals—like "sell World Cup merchandise"—into complete, executable workflows. This includes generating cohesive assets, pages, payment systems, and backend logic. The platform is augmented by a network of third-party service providers who handle infrastructure (hosting, domains, payment setup), acting like "on-site service engineers." Users can pay for these services directly with xBubble credits, simplifying onboarding. This ecosystem aims to deliver not just an app, but a complete, modifiable business launch path. xBubble targets a clear OPC segment: small commercial nodes (e.g., creators, merchants) with existing products, customers, or channels, but for whom a full tech team is unjustifiable. Its potential lies in SOPs accumulating expertise from real cases, improving reliability and reducing delivery costs over time. Additionally, its native support for crypto payments caters to global or digital-native OPCs. In summary, as AI democratizes software creation, xBubble's opportunity is to prove that "SOP-to-Business" provides more immediate value for launching a real, operational business than a powerful but unstructured AI coding tool.

链捕手Hace 39 min(s)

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

链捕手Hace 39 min(s)

If It's Not a Clear Yes, It's a No: A Nine-Year Retrospective by a VC Who Survived Four Cycles

**"Invest Only When Certain": A Nine-Year Retrospective from a VC Across Four Cycles** IOSG founder Jocy shares hard-earned lessons from nine years and over a hundred investments in Web3. The core challenge isn't identifying successful founders, but understanding why talented founders with solid ideas still fail. Through building a "failed founder database," IOSG identified six recurring failure patterns. **Founder Trait Red Flags:** 1. **Emotionally Unstable:** Founders who react defensively to criticism or publicly lash out under pressure (e.g., 80% drawdowns) often fail. Resilience is key. 2. **Lacking Hunger / Having a Fallback:** Founders with significant safety nets (family wealth, cushy fallback jobs) may lack the "do-or-die" commitment needed to survive crypto's brutal cycles. 3. **Unchecked Ego:** Includes "polished execution machines" who excel in known frameworks but struggle when paradigms shift, and "professor-types" who are technically brilliant but resistant to commercial feedback or coaching. **Project Structure Red Flags:** 4. **Token-First, Not Product-First:** Treating the token solely as a fundraising tool with no real utility or connection to product value is a major warning sign. The project should have value even if the token goes to zero. 5. **No Day-1 Exit Thesis:** Founders must have a clear, staged capital strategy from the start, understanding what each funding round needs to prove to unlock the next. "Exit before entry" is crucial. 6. **No Full-Cycle Experience:** Founders who haven't lived through a complete crypto bull/bear cycle (e.g., 2018, 2022) often underestimate their vulnerability. IOSG limits initial checks for such teams to $250k, sizing for risk. **The Positive Flipside: Desirable Founder Traits** The ideal candidate exhibits: obsessive problem-depth, being a second-time founder with a non-consensus vision, strong communication skills with *controlled* ego, relentless perseverance, and a global perspective with agency and taste (increasingly vital in the AI era). **Three Survival Tips for Founders:** 1. **Cash Flow Over Narrative:** Real revenue is what sustains projects, not vanity metrics. 2. **Tokens Are a Liability:** Avoid issuing a token unless absolutely necessary. The hidden costs (market making, liquidity, compliance) are immense, often a multi-million-dollar burden. 3. **Respect Liquidity:** Sell during peaks to build treasury, buy back to support the protocol during troughs. Be realistic about valuations and your ability to deliver for the next round. The final principle is simple yet paramount: **"If it's a borderline 'yes' or 'no,' don't invest."** In an industry that reinvents itself every few years, the discipline to consistently say "no" is the ultimate secret to longevity.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

If It's Not a Clear Yes, It's a No: A Nine-Year Retrospective by a VC Who Survived Four Cycles

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片