Nexera DeFi项目一年内遭遇第二次黑客攻击

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-08Actualizado a 2024-08-08

币界网报道:

Nexera是一个以去中心化市场为特征的DeFi项目,在过去一年中经历了第二次黑客攻击。该漏洞利用影响了本机令牌NXRA。

Nexera在过去一年中宣布了对其协议的第二次黑客攻击,影响了持有原生NXRA代币的智能合约。这些资金最终都没有进入交易所,因为Nexera立即停止了代币智能合约并冻结了资产。

最近的黑客攻击共影响了4700万个代币,剥削者设法出售了一些资金。后来,3250万NXRA被冻结在黑客的钱包中并被销毁。最初,Cyvers Alert链上的研究人员注意到了这一漏洞。他们警告Nexera,一名剥削者已经更改了其代理合同,并正在移动和桥接代币。

Nexera声称其主要智能合约是可靠的,NXRA代币仍将使用相同的地址。随后,项目团队向所有持有人发出警告,禁止从钱包中批准任何Nexera智能合约。在首次黑客攻击发生24小时多后,发出了撤销Nexera合同访问权限的警告。在产生额外损失之前,必须尽快手动撤销合同访问权限。根据Etherscan的数据,23083名持有者可能会受到影响。

损失估计在44万美元至150万美元之间。NXRA的交易量有限,主要依赖于DEX活动。黑客攻击增加了原生代币的压力,将价格暴跌至0.018美元,然后回升至0.03美元。自漏洞利用以来,NXRA交易已停止,等待对主动风险的进一步澄清。关于该漏洞的完整报告可能需要几天时间,而NXRA将被冻结几天。

黑客成功利用了一个带有代币储备的代理智能合约,耗尽了可用资产。4700万NXRA只是8.5亿代币总供应量的一小部分。然而,其中一些资产被快速出售为ETH,然后在币安智能链上转换为代币。成功售出的代币部分估计为44万美元。

Nexera在第二次黑客攻击后恢复活动

与其他Web3漏洞相比,Nexera黑客攻击的规模相对较小。协议本身并不是直接目标,但黑客试图利用质押智能合约中的一组项目。

引起人们注意的是,Nexera之前也面临过类似的情况。该团队还运营着Alliance Block(ALBT),该公司在2023年初的一份质押智能合约上损失了500万美元的代币。

黑客设法从Bonq借贷协议中提取了1.12亿ALBT,以及50万Binq欧元(BEUR)代币。黑客攻击后,ALBT代币价格暴跌,因为攻击者将资金从Polygon转移到以太坊,意图出售。

在那次黑客攻击之后,Nexera重新命名并发行了新的代币和股票代码。这一次,尽管受到直接攻击,资产仍将保留。

Nexera引起了人们对潜在内幕工作的怀疑,甚至是作为团队一员渗透的黑客的蓄意攻击。链上研究员和分析师@ZachXBT认为,Nexera攻击可能是黑客加入加密货币公司或在采访中注入恶意软件的更大趋势的一部分。研究人员将黑客组织与朝鲜联系起来,目的是窃取有价值的代币,并将其兑换成ETH,以便以后进行混合和交易。

锁定价值和抵押品的存在增加了黑客对Web3项目的破坏。随着DeFi在2024年的复苏,攻击也在加速。7月,几个大型漏洞攻击影响了WazirX、Compound、LiFi和其他平台。

就Nexera而言,直接损失很小,但价值和声誉的损失伤害了多个持有人。甚至有人怀疑Nexera的黑客行为是内部人士所为,旨在为代币回购创造条件。目前,NXRA的所有者仍在试图了解他们的资金是否会被解锁,以及该项目的智能合约是否被认为可以再次安全使用。


Hristina Vasileva的加密货币报道

Lecturas Relacionadas

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

Behind the AI scorecards that dominate industry discussions—benchmarks like MMLU-Pro, MMMU, and MMMU-Pro—stands a Chinese-Canadian researcher: Wenhu Chen. As an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of the TIGER Lab, Chen has become a key "exam-setter" for evaluating large language and multimodal models. Chen first gained broader recognition with MMLU-Pro, a more challenging and stable update to the popular MMLU benchmark. As top models like OpenAI’s o3 began achieving near-perfect scores on the original MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. MMLU-Pro introduced more complex reasoning questions, expanded answer choices, and filtered out ambiguous or simple items, effectively reintroducing differentiation among state-of-the-art models. His work on MMMU addressed the evaluation of multimodal models, requiring them to integrate visual information (like charts, diagrams, or tables) with textual knowledge across diverse academic subjects. Even the strongest models initially scored only around 56-59%, highlighting significant room for improvement in genuine multimodal reasoning. MMMU-Pro further refined this by preventing models from bypassing visual cues. Chen’s research focus has long been on complex information understanding and reasoning. His background—including a PhD at UC Santa Barbara, research at Google/DeepMind on Gemini, and now a role in Meta’s superintelligence lab—provides deep insight into model development and their potential weaknesses. His TIGER Lab also builds models (e.g., for video understanding and generation), ensuring his evaluation benchmarks are grounded in practical challenges. While AI headlines often spotlight company leaders and product launches, Chen’s work exemplifies the critical, behind-the-scenes contributions of researchers crafting the rigorous standards that define and drive progress in AI capabilities.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

STRC, the perpetual preferred stock of MicroStrategy, is experiencing a persistent de-pegging from its target par value of $100, with the discount recently widening to over 11%. This de-anchoring challenges the core design of STRC, which was intended as a stable, income-oriented security operating near $100. As a crucial funding engine for MicroStrategy's Bitcoin acquisition strategy, STRC's price reflects market confidence in the company's entire capital model. The company's "capital flywheel" relies on issuing STRC at or above $100 via an At-the-Market (ATM) program to raise cash for buying Bitcoin, thereby boosting company equity and theoretically supporting STRC's value. A monthly adjustable dividend mechanism was designed to maintain this peg. Despite raising the dividend to 11.5% and increasing payment frequency, the de-pegging persists. Market concerns extend beyond technical factors like leveraged arbitrage unwinding. Analysts point to MicroStrategy's limited cash reserves relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation for preferred shares. While the company counters that its vast Bitcoin holdings could cover decades of payments, this argument hinges on the potential need to sell Bitcoin—a shift from its longstanding "hodl" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of BTC, framed as a test, amplified these liquidity and strategy concerns. If STRC remains discounted, impairing MicroStrategy's ability to raise cheap capital, fears may grow that the company could sell more Bitcoin to meet obligations. This scenario could transform MicroStrategy from a major market buyer into a potential seller, posing significant downside risk for Bitcoin. The re-pegging of STRC is thus a key indicator for the health of MicroStrategy's capital structure and its market impact.

Odaily星球日报Hace 37 min(s)

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

Odaily星球日报Hace 37 min(s)

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

Silicon Valley's New Most Wanted Job: The Rise of the Forward Deployment Engineer The AI industry is witnessing a significant shift. The focus has moved from developing cutting-edge models to deploying them effectively within enterprises. This has made the "Forward Deployment Engineer" (FDE) a critical and highly sought-after role at major firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. For the past three years, the industry prioritized model scientists. However, companies are now facing a harsh reality: purchasing powerful AI tools does not guarantee productivity gains or organizational change. The biggest hurdle is not the technology itself, but integrating it into complex legacy systems, workflows, and corporate cultures. This includes challenges like data silos, compliance requirements, and internal resistance. The FDE role, pioneered by Palantir Technologies, addresses this "last-mile" problem. FDEs are deployed on-site with clients for extended periods. Their job is to deeply understand the client's specific organizational structure, processes, and pain points, then tailor and implement the AI solution accordingly. They combine skills in technology, project management, and organizational change. A clear signal of this trend emerged in May 2026 when three AI giants made major moves. Anthropic launched a $1.5B joint venture for enterprise deployment. OpenAI formed an independent deployment subsidiary, DeployCo, with over $4B in commitments and acquired a deployment consultancy. Google Cloud's CEO publicly announced a large-scale recruitment drive for FDEs. This shift represents a fundamental change in the software business model: from selling tools to selling guaranteed outcomes. FDEs are the agents of this change, responsible for delivering a working system within the production environment, not just a demo. Real-world cases, such as challenges at Goldman Sachs (compliance barriers) and Target (internal cultural resistance), illustrate that the primary obstacles to AI adoption are organizational, not technical. An FDE's value lies in navigating these human and procedural complexities to facilitate a successful "AI migration." In essence, as core AI technology becomes more accessible and affordable, the true premium is shifting to the human expertise required to understand organizations and drive change—making the FDE role pivotal for the next phase of the AI revolution.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片