零售经纪业的自动化:实现适当的平衡

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-07Actualizado a 2024-08-07

币界网报道:

在零售经纪行业,追求技术解决方案的高度自动化变得越来越重要。自动化减轻了管理人员的管理负担,简化了平台操作,并降低了人为错误的风险。对于拥有数千个活跃客户账户的大规模解决方案,如社交交易、PAMM或自营交易平台,自动化功能不仅是可取的,而且是必不可少的。交易业务的指数级增长使得手动监控和管理变得不切实际,促使经纪商寻求“智能”交钥匙技术,以提高可管理性和运营效率。

然而,自动化并非没有挑战。将日常任务委托给自动化系统会减少经纪人对运营流程的控制,从而引入一系列新的风险。

虽然自动化是零售经纪公司第三方解决方案的关键组成部分,但过度依赖机器可能是有害的,特别是在复杂的账户管理技术背景下。在某些情况下,手动启动流程仍然是最佳选择。为了平衡自动化和人工监督,经纪人可以采用混合策略。这种方法可能涉及:手动审批的自动化流程或部分自动化,其中某些流程是手动完成的。

Brokeree Solutions的营销经理Anton Sokolov评论道:“我理解将业务的每个部分自动化的愿望,但每个自动化过程都意味着对敏感信息的一定程度的访问。即使经纪人将所有内容都托管在专有基础设施上并信任他们的技术提供商,仍然有可能出现问题。品牌应该有一个全面的应急计划以及一个持续的审查系统,以检测与客户数据的任何差异”。“虽然自动化确实可以减少人为错误,但如果没有紧急制动或回滚过程,你就不应该依赖完全自动化的系统。”

自动化的种类:专家讨论

在账户管理系统中,自动化可以应用于不同的方面:风险管理、客户吸引力、客户关系等。在讨论第三方解决方案时,我们询问了行业专家在特定领域的自动化中看到了哪些威胁和观点。

● 当经纪商想要扩大规模时,自动化非常重要。我们喜欢帮助客户在自动化和确定手动流程在哪里更安全之间找到平衡。这取决于每个经纪人的规模、预算和人员能力。我们喜欢认为我们的经销商是“仿生的”我们指的是越来越多地使用自动化来处理单调的任务,从而让人类的智慧在最需要的地方闪耀。当然,这带来了价值,因为自动化放大了人类的努力,而不是将其最小化。有了正确的工具,经纪人可以更有效地扩展;例如,三个经销商可以完成曾经需要五个经销商完成的工作。

Alexander Geralis,Finthentic董事

● 经纪流程的自动化提供了巨大的价值,特别是在风险管理方面。它使经纪商能够立即对市场波动峰值或“黑天鹅”做出反应,管理交易流和账户杠杆,最大限度地降低极端市场条件下的风险。

自动化在打击骗子方面也很重要,长期以来,骗子一直在使用机器人来达到自己的目的。例如,比较来自不同经纪商的报价流,以发现延迟和套利交易。如果不自动检测到这种活动,就不可能有效地对抗有毒客户。

然而,仅靠自动化并不能解决这些问题。必须清楚地了解要采取哪些行动以及何时采取行动,然后根据准备好的风险管理规则自动化这些行动。在自动化与人类专业知识之间取得平衡,对于维持高水平的经纪服务至关重要。

Valerii Dolgov,Indigosoft(Brokerpilot的开发者)的首席执行官。

● 自动化是否适用于所有经纪流程,或者其中一些流程是否应该保持手动,这取决于解决方案或技术的成熟度。在DGM Tech Solutions,我们采取谨慎的态度,并向我们的经纪客户提供同样的建议。然而,我们也明白,技术进步是由那些愿意冒险进入未知领域的人推动的。要实现即使是最敏感的任务也能完全信任人工智能或脚本自动化,就需要突破界限,从战略上拥抱高风险,以获得高回报。

我主张通过采用混合方法来隔离业务的敏感方面,特别是那些涉及实时交易和客户资金的方面:在人工智能或任何自动化脚本肯定准确可靠的情况下自动化任务,并对无法保证解决方案的一致性和精确性的领域进行手动控制。与此同时,营销或CRM程序等不太敏感的功能,在这些功能中,即时错误并不严重或影响很小,可以在发现缺陷时完全自动化并加以改进。"

DGM技术解决方案总监Constantinos Michaelides

● 内容参与对任何经纪人的成功都至关重要,因为内容是让交易者采取行动的东西。然而,内容制作是一项非常昂贵的任务,涉及分析师、合规性和翻译人员。当需要跨不同主题、交易风格和多个司法管辖区和语言制作内容时,问题变得更加复杂。

Autochartist等公司可以实现内容的自动制作和分发,而成本只是雇佣内部执行此任务所需的所有员工的一小部分。除了节省大量成本外,还有一个额外的优势,即所有渠道的品牌一致性,以及所有沟通渠道的信息一致性。尽管自动化内容生产和分发具有所有优势,但仍然需要基本的人工参与,为内容提要添加一些香料。让我们这样说吧,自动化可以提供一盘意大利面,但你仍然需要一个人来添加一些盐和胡椒。

Ilan Azbel,Autochartist首席执行官

开发人员如何确保账户管理系统的自动化对经纪商来说是安全的?

在交易中可持续使用自动化的关键原则是为将其引入生态系统进行适当的规划和准备。经纪人应根据其重要性分析各种绩效过程。有些操作可以完全自动化,但与此同时,其他更重要的操作,如将账户转移到资金阶段,需要完全手动执行。还有第三类过程,其性质是混合的。它需要部分手动控制或手动启动阶段,但它们的整体自动执行通常不会提高经纪商的风险水平。

如果经纪商决定自动化部分账户管理流程,而忽略了问题的技术方面,则可以通过三个标准来定义一个强大而安全的解决方案:

    有灵活的规则来配置自动化流程;

经纪人可以选择哪些流程应该自动化,并可以为自动化操作定义特定条件。

    有内置的风险管理工具来确保正确的自动化;

这些工具可以作为定期自我审计的系统协议集成,也可以作为经纪人工作人员使用的手动监控工具集成。

    技术提供商有一个反应灵敏的技术支持团队;

Brokeree Solutions的产品负责人Yana Kitaeva表示:“根据对客户体验的分析,Prop Pulse最近的主要更新侧重于为经纪商提供更大的灵活性,以管理挑战中的参与者。虽然交易员通过挑战的自动进程提供了便利,但在某些情况下,手动筛选可能更可取。Prop Pulse现在支持这两种方法,提供灵活的风险管理和新的自动化功能。”。

Brokeree的Prop Pulse中的新功能

2024年1月,为经纪人和道具公司提供交钥匙技术的国际提供商Brokeree Solution发布了首个道具交易账户管理系统。自发布以来,Prop Pulse已经与CRM提供商和支付系统进行了多次集成。现在,开发人员宣布了该系统的第一次重大更新。新功能侧重于解决方案的自动化功能。

● 自动化

最新更新的一个显著特征是,代理能够在Prop Pulse中自动化更多流程。例如,如果经纪商取消了手动管理员控制,交易员的账户可以自动进入下一个挑战步骤。交易者必须完美地实现交易目标,并通过客户的门户发起转账。如果此阶段在不违反经纪商设置的任何限制的情况下完成,系统将允许交易者进入下一阶段。

或者,如果经纪商更喜欢保留对账户转账的手动控制,该解决方案会提供一份满足进入下一阶段条件的账户列表。只有在管理员批准后才能进行转移。

● 接口

为了轻松监控交易者在挑战中的进展,经纪商有一个带有直观仪表板的专用选项卡。最新更新通过改进的界面增强了此功能。基于客户交易数据的交互式图表,用颜色突出显示成功和不成功的账户。除了图表,管理员还可以访问详细的表格,显示交易者在挑战的每个步骤中的进度。这使管理者能够快速获得必要的信息,并在出现任何问题时做出有效回应。

关于Brokeree解决方案

十多年来,Brokeree Solutions一直致力于提升全球多资产经纪商所依赖的技术。Brokeree的旗舰产品包括跨服务器社交交易、PAMM和多平台流动性桥,适用于在MT4、MT5、cTrader和DXtrade差价合约交易平台上运营的经纪商。此外,该公司还提供50多种解决方案和工具,帮助经纪商在各个领域提升业务,包括客户吸引力、风险管理、流动性管理等。

Lecturas Relacionadas

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 9 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 9 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 13 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 13 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片