一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-08-06Actualizado a 2024-08-06

Resumen

波涛汹涌的链上，DeFi 正直接迎战。

原文作者：Pzai，Foresight News

昨日，随着全球市场经历巨大震荡，加密市场也没能独善其身。而在链上，仅以太坊生态上就创下单日清算超 3.5 亿美元的记录。市场的「一波」正在激发 DeFi 的「万波」，而 DeFi 项目是如何应对的？海啸退去之时又是谁在裸泳？故笔者撰写本文对 DeFi 在市场波动下的表现进行总结。

稳定币

在 Ethena 方面，昨日其稳定币 USDe 创下单日流出 9580 万美元的记录，总供应量也从巅峰时期的 36 亿枚回落至 31 亿枚左右。由于 Ethena 的机制导致多头头寸必须保持在较高水平，随着市场的下跌，抵押物的潜在清算导致用户需要控制风险，继而赎回相关代币。

一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

另外 Blast 上稳定币 USDB 在昨日短时脱锚至最低 0.937 美元。由于 Blast 的稳定币生态相对封闭，且 Blast 链启动初期项目方对 USDB 的激励较大，导致市场波动时资金流出的影响较大。现在 USDB 已经基本回锚。

一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

借贷协议

就清算情况而言， 8 月 5 日的清算情况最为严重，整体规模超过 3.5 亿美元。按协议分配来看，Aave V3 的清算额最大，达到 2.5 亿美元。其次是 Compound 清算，总清算额达 7960 万美元。在 Aave V3 的清算中，主要集中于以太坊的大类资产清算，前三名分别为 WETH、wstETH 和 WBTC。

一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

在市场波动中，Aave 也获得了超过 600 万美元的收入。

一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

清算完成后，链上整体的清算线已经低于 2000 美元。在清算中，由于机制特性，在市场波动较大时容易出现坏账，如 Aave V3 近七天内共产生了 35 万美元的坏账。相比之下，Curve Llamalend 因为其软清算机制避免了大部分硬清算，其中软清算在 8 月 5 日承担了 5024 万美元的清算份额。

一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

整体而言，借贷协议对本次市场波动的应对还算差强人意。

去中心化交易所（DEX）

在 Uniswap V3 中， 8 月 5 日达到最高峰值 8.4 亿美元，并为 LP 产生了 111.9 万美元的费用。

一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

GMX 方面， 8 月 5 日当天，持有头寸较前日下降了 30% 左右，并清算了 830 万美元的资产，主要以 USDC 为主。

一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

再质押

再质押资产作为现今以太坊的核心资产之一，市场波动下的流出也比较显著。例如 Renzo 的质押通证 ezETH 最低脱锚至 0.876 WETH 点位。

一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

协议流出上，以 ether.fi 为例， 8 月 5 日全天就提现了 79013 枚 ETH，总价值超过 1 亿美元，其中大部分是 Eigenlayer 的 eETH 提现。凭借着超过 7.7 万枚 ETH 的流动性和 73% 以上的 DeFi 利用率，协议不存在整体上的挤兑风险。

一波万波，市场波动下的DeFi表现如何？

整体而言，Lido stETH 提现队列没有大幅增长的态势，且链上主要的 LST 一直保持稳定。所以整体上再质押生态没有系统性风险。

References：

https://parsec.fi/layout/cryptoian/_N3 3 MkeM

https://community.chaoslabs.xyz/aave/risk/liquidations

https://dune.com/ether_fi/etherfi

https://dune.com/hildobby/ethena

Lecturas Relacionadas

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

Korean storage export data for the first 20 days of June shows substantial year-on-year increases in both value and price-per-kilogram for categories like DRAM, NAND, and SSDs. This signals a potential shift beyond simple demand recovery, indicating rising prices and a product mix shift towards higher-value items, possibly influenced by AI infrastructure needs. A key point is that the surge in price-per-kilogram is not simply a uniform chip price hike. It reflects a combination of actual price increases and, more importantly, an export structure increasingly dominated by high-value-density products like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) and advanced DRAM, which are critical for AI servers. This suggests AI-driven demand may be spilling over from just HBM into broader memory markets. SK Hynix stands to benefit directly due to its leading HBM position. For Samsung and Micron, the implication is potential for greater margin elasticity if the tightness in high-end memory spreads to enterprise SSD and NAND prices. However, the storage sector remains cyclical. Risks include supply expansion, inventory changes, and potential slowdowns in broader AI capital expenditure. Ultimately, while the strong export data supports upward revisions for storage company earnings and fuels discussion of an "AI infrastructure bottleneck premium," a definitive valuation shift from a cyclical to a structural story depends on upcoming quarterly reports. Investors need confirmation from SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron that improvements in average selling prices, product mix, and, crucially,毛利率 are sustained over multiple quarters.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO on June 12, 2026, with its market cap surging past $2.1 trillion. This valuation reflects its central role within Elon Musk's expansive, interconnected technological ecosystem. The article details how four core components form a synergistic closed-loop system: 1) **The "Brain" (xAI & Orbital Compute):** xAI provides AI models and massive ground/space-based supercomputing for simulation and decision-making across the system. 2) **The "Neural Logistics Core" (Starlink & Starship):** Starlink's low-latency satellite network enables global data transmission, while Starship's low-cost, reusable launch capacity aims to make large-scale space deployment economically viable. 3) **The "Physical Body" (Tesla & Optimus):** Tesla's manufacturing prowess and energy products support hardware production and power, pivoting toward mass-producing the Optimus humanoid robot for terrestrial and potential space-based labor. 4) **The "Human Interface" (Neuralink & X):** Neuralink seeks direct brain-computer communication, and the X platform provides real-time societal data. Together, these elements create three reinforcing "flywheels": manufacturing/logistics, data-driven iteration, and energy/compute/network synergy. This integrated approach promises lower costs, faster innovation cycles, and potential infrastructure-as-a-service offerings. However, it also concentrates technical, regulatory, and corporate governance risks. Ultimately, SpaceX's high valuation stems from its position as the indispensable infrastructural backbone—handling space transport, global communications, and future orbital computing—tying together Musk's entire vision for a self-reinforcing technological empire.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

Snap's AR Obsession: A Decade of Betting Against the Odds On June 16, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel unveiled the new AR glasses, Specs, priced at $2,195, causing the company's stock (SNAP) to plummet nearly 10%. The launch was met with intense criticism online, with investors questioning why a consistently unprofitable company would stake its future on an expensive product its core young user base can't afford. Snapchat, known for pioneering features like ephemeral Stories and popular AR lenses (like the iconic dog filter), has a history of innovation often copied by rivals like Instagram and Meta. Despite this, it has struggled to translate first-mover advantage into commercial success. Since its 2017 IPO, Snap has reported annual net losses, with a Q1 2026 loss of $89 million. Its stock is down 94% from its 2021 peak, hampered by iOS privacy changes, competition, and a young demographic less attractive to major advertisers. In this challenging context, Spiegel is doubling down on AR. He calls 2026 a "crucible moment," having recently laid off 16% of staff while reportedly investing over $3.5 billion cumulatively in its AR glasses line over nearly a decade. The new Specs represent a significant leap from the 2016 camera-focused Spectacles, offering true AR overlays, gesture control, and standalone operation. However, at $2,195, it faces tough comparisons. While more advanced than Meta's $799 Ray-Ban smart glasses, critics point to its heavier weight, short battery life, and features largely replicable by a smartphone. Facing pressure from investors to cut losses on the Specs project, Spiegel has refused, framing it as essential to Snap's long-term vision. The company finds itself in a paradoxical position: cutting costs while heavily funding a decade-long, unproven bet. Some see Specs as an awkward but necessary step in AR's evolution, akin to early mobile phones. Whether Spiegel is a visionary outlier or a gambler destined to fail remains an open question, highlighting the tension between long-term ambition and short-term market demands.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Kalshi, a leading U.S. prediction markets platform, is reportedly in early, informal discussions for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). The company's annualized revenue now exceeds $2 billion, fueled by its dominance of over 90% of the domestic prediction market activity. This growth stems from a surge in trading volume—reaching a total of $52.7 billion—and an increase in fee rates, largely driven by sports event contracts like the NBA playoffs and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Monthly active users are approximately 2 million. Kalshi recently raised $1 billion in a funding round led by Coatue Management, valuing the company at $22 billion. It has also expanded its offerings to include Bitcoin perpetual contracts and plans to launch a dedicated trading platform, Kalshi Pro. However, Kalshi's path to an IPO faces significant regulatory hurdles. The core risk involves jurisdictional conflicts, as multiple U.S. states are challenging its operations under local gambling laws. For instance, Arizona has filed criminal charges against the platform, while states like Kentucky have filed lawsuits. Kalshi and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) argue that its event contracts fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction as "swaps." The outcomes of these ongoing legal battles could critically impact Kalshi's core revenue and its IPO timeline. Analysts suggest that while an IPO could theoretically occur by late 2026, a more likely timeframe is late 2027 or 2028, contingent on resolving legal issues and favorable market conditions. If successful, its fundraising could significantly exceed $1 billion, given its current valuation and revenue multiple.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Don't Care if You Know Football or Not, Buying the Draw Is the Best Strategy for This World Cup?

The article analyzes the 2026 FIFA World Cup group stage and argues that betting on a draw has been a surprisingly profitable strategy. Based on data from the prediction market Polymarket, a strategy of betting $1000 on a draw for each of the first 40 matches would have yielded a return of over 100%, despite only 13 matches ending in a draw. The core of the strategy is not the frequency of wins, but the high payout when low-probability draws occur, such as Spain's 0-0 draw with Cape Verde, where pre-match odds for a draw were only 5.5%. The article identifies common draw scores, like 1-1, which provide stability, and high-value 0-0 stalemates, where favorites fail to break down resilient defenses. It highlights Group G as an example, where 3 of the first 4 matches ended in draws, illustrating that draws are a tactical part of group stage calculus as teams often prioritize not losing. In conclusion, while strong teams remain favorites on the pitch, the article claims that for traders, betting on draws has so far produced the most significant profits.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Don't Care if You Know Football or Not, Buying the Draw Is the Best Strategy for This World Cup?

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros