随着金融危机的加剧,Jump Crypto清算了DeFi头寸

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-05Actualizado a 2024-08-05

币界网报道:

Jump Crypto是Sam Bankman Fried的FTX和Do Kwon的Terra/Luna/Nanchor平台上最活跃的交易者之一。然而,在FTX倒闭后损失了至少3亿美元,并因其在Terra LUNA消亡中的作用而产生了难以估量的民事后果之后,Jump的加密货币鼎盛时期已经过去了。

它已经清算了Lido等平台上的各种DeFi头寸,并将数千万美元的收益发送到集中交易所。

Jump面临至少两起集体诉讼和商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)的调查。周末的区块链证据表明,它可能正在试图筹集现金。

根据Bitget赞助的研究,研究人员声称已经对Jump的钱包进行了去匿名化处理,这些钱包已经兑换了价值超过5亿美元的Lido的打包质押以太坊(wstETH),并向中心化交易所发送了数千万美元。

其他传言称,Jump将完全关闭其做市业务。这些是由RealVision的Raoul Pal附议的。

一些人将最近以太币价格的下跌归咎于Jump。

Jump仍然是加密货币做市商吗?

阿卡姆还声称拥有属于Jump的匿名钱包。其研究声称,Jump的加密货币余额在2021年11月达到96亿美元的峰值,现在仅价值5.6亿美元。更糟糕的是,加密货币的阿尔法风险敞口进一步限制在该投资组合的6%,其中94%为稳定币USDC和USDT。

Jump Crypto可能控制的另一个钱包还有价值1.3亿美元的以太币和以太币衍生品。

鉴于卡纳夫·卡里亚于6月24日辞去总统职务,此后没有在X上发帖,Jump的下台更加可疑。

当然,作为一个老练的市场参与者和场外交易(OTC)交易商,可以访问上市和非上市的奇异衍生品,使用简单的区块链取证无法确定Jump的全部投资组合,因为这无法解释纸质合约或集中交易头寸。

关于Jump Crypto的负面谣言在周末流传。

阅读更多:Jump Crypto的幕后支持者可能会在CFTC调查期间使事情变得更糟

在法庭上,Jump有几起未决诉讼。6月6日,Jump Trading LLC在美国伊利诺伊州北区地方法院遭遇挫折。由Taewoo Kim领导的集体诉讼赢得了其拒绝Jump Trading加密货币部门前总裁Kanav Kariya的场地转移和诉讼合并请求的请求。

伊利诺伊州的集体诉讼将继续进行,这与尼克·帕特森在加利福尼亚州领导的另一起集体诉讼不同。这两个类别都主张《受勒索者影响和腐败组织法》(RICO)对Jump Crypto提出指控,指控其协助和教唆、阴谋和不当得利。

上个月,《财富》杂志采访了许多消息来源,得出的结论是,卡里亚至少在一定程度上是一名主唱。一位匿名举报者还声称,在幕后,jump联合创始人Bill DiSomma“仍在掌控jump Crypto的大部分事务”

《财富》杂志报道称,法庭观察员正在关注案件记录,以寻找对Jump Trading或其加密货币部门可能采取监管行动的迹象。美国司法部提到了Jump Crypto在2021年Terra(UST)稳定币脱钩中的作用。

有消息吗?给我们发电子邮件或ProtonMail。如需了解更多信息,请在X、Instagram、Bluesky和谷歌新闻上关注我们,或订阅我们的YouTube频道。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

Wall Street Questions the AI Narrative of Tech Giants Wall Street is shifting its focus from the hype surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) to a rigorous financial reality check. Following strong earnings reports from companies like Google and a massive $500 billion financing initiative from Nvidia for AI infrastructure, the market reaction has been mixed and skeptical. The core concern revolves around the massive capital expenditure (CapEx) required for AI development—building data centers and acquiring chips—and whether future cash flows can justify these upfront costs. Investors are now scrutinizing free cash flow (FCF), which measures the cash left after operational expenses and capital investments. A negative FCF, as seen recently with Alphabet (Google's parent company), signals heavy immediate spending, even if profits are growing. The divergent stock reactions highlight this new scrutiny. Microsoft's stock surged after its earnings, supported by strong operating cash flow, growing cloud revenue (Azure), and a large backlog of committed business. In contrast, Alphabet's stock fell despite profit growth because its capital spending caused FCF to turn negative for the first time. Similarly, Nvidia's announcement of a $500 billion financing platform, while potentially expanding its market, raised questions about whether AI build-out has become too expensive for tech companies to fund internally. Analysts are moving beyond simply asking if there is AI demand—which cloud revenue growth confirms—to deeper questions: the speed at which AI investments translate into revenue, profit, and ultimately, cash returns. The market is evaluating the "return on invested capital" (ROIC) over the long term, considering factors like rapid chip obsolescence, energy costs, and future competition. In summary, Wall Street's AI narrative is evolving from grand vision to a detailed financial and operational examination. The key question is no longer if AI is transformative, but whether companies can generate cash returns fast enough to outpace the immense costs of building it. Free cash flow has become a critical first filter in this reassessment.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

In the spring of 2026, Elon Musk unveiled the TeraFab chip manufacturing plan, aiming to meet the immense computing power needs of SpaceX and Tesla. He subsequently signaled a move into the photolithography machine market, with speculation centering on a Free Electron Laser (FEL) approach to challenge the dominance of traditional EUV technology. Currently, ASML, utilizing Laser-Produced Plasma (LPP) EUV光源, holds a near-monopoly. However, LPP faces bottlenecks in energy conversion efficiency, tin debris contamination, and a power ceiling. In contrast, FEL technology, pursued by companies like xLight (where former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger serves as executive chairman), offers a different path. It generates EUV light by accelerating electrons, potentially providing higher power without plasma conversion and its associated contamination, targeting the sub-13.5nm "beyond-EUV" wavelength range. The photolithography landscape shows three main trajectories: ASML's incremental evolution (like High-NA EUV),光源革新 like FEL targeting ASML's core component, and non-EUV alternatives like Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) or Electron Beam Lithography (EBL). While ASML remains the dominant player with strong financials and产能 expansion plans, new entrants are challenging the status quo. xLight claims its FEL could boost productivity by 50-100%. Other paths include Substrate's particle-accelerator-based X-ray lithography and Chinese research into LPP alternatives. Musk's TeraFab is a high-stakes bet that FEL can move from lab to fab, that "plug-and-play"光源 replacement can circumvent ASML's ecosystem, and that massive future compute demand justifies a new supply chain. His public endorsement of FEL signifies that the photolithography business is no longer ASML's game alone.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Bitcoin Policy Institute Calls on AI Developers to Provide Crypto Infrastructure Defenders with Access to Advanced Models

The Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI) has issued an open letter urging leading AI developers to grant trusted access to advanced AI models for defenders of critical crypto infrastructure. Analysts warn that sophisticated AI systems, capable of analyzing large codebases and finding vulnerabilities, could be leveraged by malicious actors before open-source defenders can use them, posing a significant risk to the trillion-dollar digital asset ecosystem. Vulnerable points include wallets, signing devices, cryptographic libraries, node software, exchanges, and payment networks. BPI highlights that developers of key open-source projects like Bitcoin Core currently lack access to the specialized cybersecurity programs and most powerful AI models available to leading AI labs and their partners. This creates a dangerous asymmetry. The institute calls on AI labs to establish or expand permanent trusted access programs, providing qualified developers and researchers with early, supervised access to cutting-edge models, sufficient computing resources for security audits, secure environments for analyzing sensitive code, and direct channels for vulnerability disclosure and coordinated fixes. The goal is to enable defenders to identify and patch security flaws before attackers can exploit them. BPI also urges the crypto industry to assist AI labs in identifying reliable participants for such access programs and coordinating response efforts.

cryptonews.ruHace 22 min(s)

Bitcoin Policy Institute Calls on AI Developers to Provide Crypto Infrastructure Defenders with Access to Advanced Models

cryptonews.ruHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片