84万美元才能和特朗普说上话?这些人却只用不到5000美元就做到了

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-07-23Actualizado a 2024-07-23

Resumen

一些 NFT 玩家们仅花费不到 5000 美元就获得了和川普近距离接触的机会

川普遇刺,让全世界都感觉到惊讶与凶险万分,其大难不死也让许多人开玩笑称他为「天选之人」。不仅如此,他在遇刺后第一时间的反应,直接为摄影师提供了今年的年度照片,以及年度口号「Fight, Fight, Fight」。

84万美元才能和特朗普说上话?这些人却只用不到5000美元就做到了

虽然过去的一段时间爆火的 Trump 概念 meme Token 有所降温,不过这位美国总统候选人在 Crypto 圈内依然受到极高关注,因为他即将出席在美国田纳西州纳什维尔举行的 Bitcoin 2024 活动,并且将在该活动上进行时长 30 分钟的个人演讲。

那么有没有办法在该活动上与川普进行近距离的接触呢?根据网上晒出的邀请函来看,想要与川普合影,需要花费 6 万美元,如果是两个人同时一起与川普合影,价格则是 10 万美元。如果还想更进一步,与川普进行一场圆桌会议,价格则高达 84 万 4600 美元,这个价格刚好是个人可以向川普和共和党联合筹款委员会提供的最高合法捐款额。

84万美元才能和特朗普说上话?这些人却只用不到5000美元就做到了

在这次热度极高的比特币活动上,与川普进行一次合照就需要花费接近 1 个比特币。而在此前,一些 NFT 玩家们仅花费不到 5000 美元就获得了和川普近距离接触的机会。

2023 年底,川普宣布了他的第三个 NFT 系列「Mugshot Edition」,每张售价 99 美元。购买超过 47 张「Mugshot Edition」的支持者就能够与川普在位于美国佛罗里达州的海湖庄园共进晚餐,还有机会获得一件川普于 2023 年被捕时所身穿的西装。

84万美元才能和特朗普说上话?这些人却只用不到5000美元就做到了

「Mugshot Edition」的卡片内容正与川普在 2023 年的被捕相关。此外,没有交易量是因为该系列在 2024 年 12 月 31 日前都无法转移

购买超过 100 张「Mugshot Edition」,不但可以在晚宴上坐 VIP 桌,还可以额外邀请 2 人参加晚宴前的鸡尾酒会,并且能够得到川普将在 Ordinals 上发行的总量仅 200 的比特币 NFT 系列(目前这个系列已经刻录,但是还没有进行分发)。84万美元才能和特朗普说上话?这些人却只用不到5000美元就做到了

川普的 Ordinals 系列

在去年的 11 月,「Mugshot Edition」大户们第一次享受了该项目承诺的「与川普共进晚餐」的赋能。

84万美元才能和特朗普说上话?这些人却只用不到5000美元就做到了

而在今年的 5 月,川普又在海湖庄园举行了一次「加密专场」。在这次的活动中,川普很自豪地宣称所有支持他的 NFT 玩家与他一起成功地「Make NFTs hot again」,因为「Mugshot Edition」的成功发行是在 NFT 熊市之中。

84万美元才能和特朗普说上话?这些人却只用不到5000美元就做到了

@tier 10 k 还提到,CoinDesk 记者 Danny Nelson 也参加了这次活动并录下了一段有趣的对话。在活动中,有人向川普提到了拜登概念 meme Token $BODEN 有了 2.4 亿美元的市值,川普听到后表示,「这对于一个币来说钱真挺多,我不喜欢这个投资」。

84万美元才能和特朗普说上话?这些人却只用不到5000美元就做到了

在 NFT 圈内,DeGods 的联合创始人 @frankdegods 也参与了本次活动。另一位来自 DeGods 的团队成员 @macdegods 则更为幸运,戴着圈内知名 meme Mog 的眼镜的他在台下举手,被川普成功「翻牌」,他问川普的问题是,许多美国 Crypto 企业因为监管原因离开美国,如何解决这样的情况。川普则回答,如果我们要拥抱加密,我们就必须让这些 Crypto 企业留在美国。

84万美元才能和特朗普说上话?这些人却只用不到5000美元就做到了

有许多声音认为,川普在选前对 Crypto 的示好只是为了拉拢 Crypto 属性的选民,如果他能胜选,对于 Crypto 到底能够有多少支持还是存疑的。诚然,这是一个严谨的观点,我认为 Crypto 在美国和全球范围内的接受程度依然不够大众,把希望寄托在一位可能的总统所可能执行的政策,是不靠谱的。只有当 Crypto 真正成为大众司空见惯的事物并且和大众的生活形成更紧密关联时,自下而上的推动结合自上而下的支持才能让 Crypto 摆脱目前发展的桎梏。

不过,对于一位已经发行了 3 个 NFT 系列,并且明确将在比特币上有第 4 个 NFT 系列的美国总统候选人来说,我们发挥一些 Crypto 特有的娱乐精神,保持一个相对乐观的态度,也是完全合理的。

纳什维尔的 Bitcoin 2024 活动即将开始,我们会看到川普抛出哪些重量级的利好 Crypto 的言论吗?又或者,有没有一点点可能,川普在发言中提到 Ordinals,提到符文?

Lecturas Relacionadas

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

**Title: The Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate Over Any 4-Year Holding Period** This article analyzes which major, freely-tradable assets have historically never produced a nominal loss over any rolling 4-year holding window. It concludes that only two distinct categories achieve this: ultra-low-risk contractual assets and Bitcoin. Among traditional risk assets, none maintain a perfect 4-year record. The S&P 500 had negative 4-year periods (e.g., 1929-1932: -64.8%). The Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 60% from 2000-2003. Gold saw a ~47.7% loss from 1981-1984. US real estate declined about 23.3% from 2007-2010. Even long-term US Treasury bonds (e.g., 2021-2024: -19.8%) and corporate bonds can produce 4-year losses due to interest rate and market price risks. In contrast, the first category achieving 100% nominal success includes assets like rolling 3-month US Treasury Bills, 4-year certificates of deposit (CDs), and US Treasuries held to maturity within 4 years. Their "guarantee" stems from contractual obligations and credit backing (e.g., FDIC insurance, US sovereign promise), not price appreciation. The sole exception in the high-risk category is Bitcoin. Analysis of daily data from 2010-2026 across 4,419 rolling 4-year windows shows a 100% positive return rate. The worst 4-year period (April 2021 to April 2025) still yielded a +32.6% total return (~7.3% CAGR). This record is unique because Bitcoin has no issuer, promises no cash flows, and has endured severe drawdowns (70-90%), yet its market price has always recovered within a 4-year span. The key distinction is the source of the "100%": contractual assets offer known, low nominal returns, while Bitcoin's record stems purely from historical price appreciation despite extreme volatility. The article suggests that for Bitcoin, the ability to hold for 4+ years is more critical than active trading strategies.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

This article details the dramatic rise and near-collapse of a hedge fund built by Leopold Aschenbrenner, a 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher. The fund, named Situational Awareness, amassed $45 billion in assets within two years. Its explosive growth stemmed from Aschenbrenner's influential 165-page manifesto predicting AGI's arrival by 2027 and his high-profile Silicon Valley connections. The fund employed an extremely aggressive strategy: high concentration and 400% leverage to bet long on AI infrastructure stocks while shorting legacy software firms. In July, this structure backfired when both sides of the trade reversed simultaneously—AI stocks plunged while shorted stocks rallied—triggering massive losses that nearly wiped out all equity. Major player Jane Street reportedly lost billions. The fund's leveraged public portfolio was ultimately sold at a discount to Citadel. The SEC is now investigating banks like Goldman Sachs for their role in facilitating the fund's high-leverage trades. The article compares this to past blow-ups like Archegos, highlighting systemic failures in risk management where the pursuit of short-term profits overrode due diligence. It questions whether such risky leverage concentrated in the AI sector, currently at record highs, poses a broader systemic threat. Ironically, Aschenbrenner, who studied AI safety at OpenAI, designed a fund structure prone to uncontrolled failure. Days after the crisis, he reportedly raised another $400 million for new investments.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

This summer, the mathematics community was shaken as OpenAI's Astra model reportedly solved 10 long-standing open problems, and Claude Fable 5 found a potential counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture. This was followed by a major shift in physics: renowned physicist Gavin E. Crooks presented an open problem in stochastic thermodynamics to Claude, which the AI solved completely in days—a task that might take a skilled graduate student months. The problem concerned constraints on entropy production statistics under the Detailed Fluctuation Theorem (DFT), a core concept in non-equilibrium physics. Claude provided a unifying geometric answer: all possible DFT-compatible distributions correspond to a convex "moment body." Its key insight was that for a fixed "gap," the distribution is uniquely determined, making any general DFT distribution a mixture of these basic two-outcome distributions. This structure implies that for given lower-order moments, the nth moment only has a sharp lower bound, with no upper bound. Claude demonstrated that numerous previously published bounds on entropy production are merely low-dimensional projections or "shadows" of this single, unified convex body. The AI-authored paper offers a complete hierarchical characterization of the moment constraints. This case signifies a potential paradigm shift: AI is progressing from solving known problems to aiding in the exploration of fundamental, unsolved scientific questions, heralding an AI-accelerated era for physics.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片