海斯特·皮尔斯竞选美国证券交易委员会主席?这位美国议员说…

币界网Publicado a 2024-07-20Actualizado a 2024-07-20

币界网报道:
    Hill长期以来一直批评Gensler对加密货币问题的处理。他敦促参议院推进FIT21,由CFTC监督现货加密货币交易所

2024年,加密货币领域迄今为止一直是头条新闻。事实上,它在即将到来的总统选举中发挥了至关重要的作用,也影响了美国证券交易委员会(SEC)对数字资产的做法。

Gensler的处境岌岌可危吗?

随着加密货币采用率的上升和现任美国证券交易委员会主席加里·詹斯勒的反加密立场,正在竞选众议院金融服务委员会主席的众议员弗兰奇·希尔最近分享了他对美国证券交易委员会未来领导层的看法。

希尔在最新一期的《解放》播客中评论道:,

“海丝特·皮尔斯将永远是我成为主席的推荐人。”

在这里,Hill指的是Hester Maria Peirce,一位目前担任美国证券交易委员会专员的美国律师。

Hill解释说,尽管Gensler有资格,但他在创新、资本形成和数字资产方面的做法让加密货币社区感到失望。

具体而言,Hill批评Gensler推迟了比特币[BTC]和以太坊[ET]交易所交易产品(ETPs)的批准,这一问题需要联邦法院的干预。当时,法院将这一过程称为,

“任性!”

为什么众议员希尔对FIT21法案表示赞赏?

此外,在谈话中,众议员Hill讨论了美国加密货币立法的进展和挑战。

这位立法者对众议院在两党支持下通过的全面的FIT21法案表示赞赏,并声称该法案解决了与稳定币和数字资产相关的监管问题。他补充说,

“我们在不到一年的时间里取得了这样的进展。”

他还感谢参议院的努力,包括参议员布兹曼、卢米斯和吉利布兰德。然而,希尔批评参议院银行委员会进展缓慢。

此外,他强调需要更明确的法规和两党合作,并敦促参议院,

“利用我们在国会剩下的几天时间来帮助推动这项立法。”

为什么CFTC对现货加密货币交易所的监管是有意义的?

最后,为了使事情更加透明,他还建议将加密货币现货交易所的监管权交给商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)。

现在,这个想法在加密货币行业的许多方面都存在争议。然而,希尔表示,经过广泛讨论和听证会,CFTC是进行这一监督的适当机构。特别是因为BTC和ETH等被广泛认为是商品。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

Gold is experiencing its strongest rally since 1979, with prices reaching a record high near $5,600 per ounce in January. This surge is driven primarily by central banks, not retail investors. In 2025, central banks net purchased 863 tonnes of gold, with a similar increase expected in 2026. Traditional gold investment methods—physical bullion and ETFs—present trade-offs like storage issues, limited access, or management fees. Tokenized gold emerges as a third option: digital tokens representing ownership of physical bars stored in professional vaults. These tokens are globally transferable in seconds, divisible, and redeemable for physical metal. The potential impact mirrors that of dollar stablecoins. Stablecoins digitized the dollar, enabling cheap, instant, global transfers and driving adoption from $27 billion in 2020 to over $3 trillion today. Similarly, tokenized gold solves gold's "form problem"—its lack of divisibility, portability, and accessibility. Adoption is accelerating. In Q1 2026, tokenized gold trading volume hit $90.7 billion, surpassing the $84.6 billion for all of 2025. Its market cap exceeded $6 billion, growing 5.5 times faster than physical gold holdings in the quarter. While concerns about counterparty risk exist, tokenized gold represents a direct claim on allocated bars, with major issuers providing regular attestation reports. Just as stablecoins placed dollars on a digital, global rail, tokenized gold now offers a more practical form for this ancient asset, potentially expanding access to billions.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

Japanese borrowing costs have hit their highest levels since 1996, with yields on 30-year bonds reaching 4.185%. This marks a significant shift for a country long reliant on negative rates. Concurrently, Bitcoin surged 22% past $80,000, seemingly decoupled from the bond market turmoil. Historically, the massive yen carry trade has fueled global risk assets, predicated on near-zero Japanese rates. This assumption is now challenged. A potential rate hike by the Bank of Japan in September could strengthen the yen, forcing carry trade unwinds and potentially triggering a global deleveraging event, as seen in August 2024 when Bitcoin fell sharply. Conversely, if the yen weakens further, Bitcoin could attract Japanese investors as a hedge against currency depreciation and the country's massive debt burden. Institutional adoption in Japan is growing, with regulatory changes paving the way for potential crypto ETFs by 2027. The key variable is the BoJ's September policy signal. If it hints at a rapid tightening cycle to combat inflation and support the yen, risk assets like Bitcoin may face selling pressure from carry trade liquidation. However, if debt sustainability concerns limit its hawkishness, leading to a weaker yen, Bitcoin could benefit. Currently, the market is betting on a slow-motion debt crisis, not a sudden collapse. While Bitcoin shows resilience, its fate remains tied to the direction of the yen and the scale of any carry trade unwind.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

"Bitcoin's Quantum Defense: A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes" by the Blockstream Research Team explores how Bitcoin can transition to quantum-resistant digital signatures, as current schemes like Schnorr and ECDSA are vulnerable to quantum computers. The report evaluates three lattice-based signature candidates—Dilithium, Falcon, and Hawk—against criteria like on-chain cost (key/signature size), implementation complexity, deployment risks, and support for Bitcoin's key derivation standard (BIP-32). The analysis recommends a minimum Security Level 3 for Bitcoin due to its long-term security needs. Dilithium (ML-DSA) is praised for its simplicity and integer-only operations, making it easier to implement securely, but it has the largest signature size (~5.3 KB for Level 3). Falcon (FN-DSA) offers the most compact signatures (e.g., ~3.1 KB for Level 5) and the fastest verification, though its signing requires complex floating-point sampling—a solvable engineering challenge. Hawk, despite its small size, was withdrawn from NIST standardization after a security vulnerability was discovered, highlighting the importance of conservative security margins. Currently, neither Dilithium nor Falcon has a fully viable, production-ready BIP-32 key derivation method. The report concludes that if a lattice-based scheme had to be chosen now, Falcon-1024 would be the preferred option for its balance of size, speed, and mature security assumptions. However, the short-term recommendation remains hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+) for their lower risk, with a potential future hybrid or full transition to Falcon once its standard (FN-DSA) is finalized and well-supported.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片