金色早报 | 超6300万美元的LINK被转移 苏黎世应用科技大学推出欧洲首个比特币硕士课程

金色财经Publicado a 2024-07-08Actualizado a 2024-07-08

头条

▌超6300万美元的LINK从未知钱包转移到未知钱包

据Whale Alert监测，北京时间5月25日23:08分左右，3,696,603枚LINK（63,457,080美元）从未知钱包转移到未知钱包。

▌苏黎世应用科技大学推出欧洲首个专门针对比特币的硕士课程

苏黎世应用科学大学将推出欧洲首个专门针对比特币的硕士课程。比特币经济HWZ CAS是一门针对金融行业学生的综合课程。

行情

截至发稿，据Coingecko数据显示：

BTC最近成交价69158.24美元，日内涨跌幅+0.88%；

ETH最近成交价3748.25美元，日内涨跌幅+0.90%；

BNB最近成交价601.78美元，日内涨跌幅+0.29%；

SOL最近成交价167.85美元，日内涨跌幅+1.03%；

DOGE最近成交价0.1721美元，日内涨跌幅+5.63%；

XPR最近成交价0.5407美元，日内涨跌幅+1.10%。

政策

▌巴拉圭当局在萨普凯市抓获了近400名比特币矿工

据Bitcoin News消息，巴拉圭当局在萨普凯市抓获了近400名比特币矿工。此次行动由警方和国家电力管理局（ADE）联合开展，是对涉嫌窃电行为进行调查的一部分。

▌美参议员：将努力保护每个美国人保管自己私钥的权利

据Bitcoin Magazine消息，美国参议员Cynthia Lummis表示，不是你的私钥，就不是你的加密货币。我将努力保护每个美国人保管自己私钥的权利。

    区块链应用

    ▌Polygon增长主管：Layer 3牺牲了一些主权，依赖于L2强加的治理和费用提取

    Polygon增长主管Texan在X平台上发表关于“Layer 3”的几点看法： ·有人提出用L3来解决加密扩展问题，但它们有很多缺点； ·聚合的L2具有所有优点，但没有缺点，可真正实现加密扩展； ·一些L3可以在单个L2生态系统内实现互操作性，但这仍然会通过建立护城河来分散流动性和用户； ·许多依赖L2进行结算的L3模式都包含费用提取； ·L3牺牲了一些主权，依赖于L2强加的治理和费用提取。

    ▌Horizen基金会请求ZEN和EON的迁移提案已获得通过

    Horizen区块链发文称，ZenIP 42405投票：指示Horizen基金会请求ZEN和EON的迁移提案已结束。99.99%的赞成票表明该提案已通过。

        加密货币

        ▌特朗普：对加密货币公司及相关行业持积极和开放态度

        唐纳德·特朗普（Donald Trump）在 Truth Social 上明确表达对加密货币的支持。特朗普表示：“对加密货币公司及相关行业持积极和开放态度。我们的国家必须成为领导者”。他还批评拜登希望加密行业“慢慢痛苦地消亡”。

        ▌Jupiter第三轮LFG Launchpad投票结束，deBridge为选定项目

        Solana生态DEX Jupiter在X平台发文表示，第三轮LFG Launchpad投票已结束，deBridge以59%的得票率获胜，将在未来几个月内在LFG Launchpad上推出。 此前消息，deBridge公布其治理代币DBR。DBR总供应量为100亿枚，旨在将治理权下放给社区，并将控制权移交给DAO。deBridge的代币分配计划将20%的供应量分配给Launch及其社区，发行时DBR的流通供应量为18亿枚。剩余供应量中，26%将分配用于支持其生态，20%将分配给核心贡献者，17%将分配给战略合作伙伴，15%将分配给deBridge基金会，2%将分配给验证者。

        ▌NEAR链上原生发行USDC突破2亿美元

        据官方消息，NEAR Protocol原生发行的USDC超过2亿美元。

        ▌加密专用对冲基金市场总额增长至210亿美元

        数据提供商CCData研究主管Joshua de Vos表示，对冲基金 Three Arrows 和 Alameda Research 的破产为市场反弹后新参与者的进入提供了机会。在幸存下来的基金中，许多基金在最近几个月实现了两位数和三位数的百分比回报。 de Vos表示，鉴于加密货币的周期性，很有可能出现新的加密原生基金，以帮助填补这些实体留下的空白，并利用这一周期中出现的新机遇。 据追踪机构Galaxy VisionTrack称，加密专用对冲基金市场总额已从12月份的163亿美元增长至2022年10月份以来的首次210亿美元。

        ▌RWA报告：加密货币成为现实世界资产的崛起

        CoinGecko发布2024年RWA报告。报告称，目前，大多数现实世界资产（RWA）都是与美元挂钩的稳定币。仅前三大美元稳定币就占据了95%的市场份额，其中Tether(USDT)市值为961亿美元，USDC(USDC)市值为268亿美元，Dai(DAI)市值为49亿美元。 USDT继续占据主导地位，市场份额为71.4%。与此同时，在2023年3月美国银行业危机期间短暂脱钩后，USDC的市场份额暴跌，至今未能恢复。 除美元挂钩的稳定币之外的稳定资产仅占市场的1%。这些资产包括其他法定货币，例如欧元Tether(EURT)、离岸人民币Tether(CNHT)、墨西哥比索Tether(MXNT)、欧元兑美元(EURC)、StasisEuro(EURS)和比里拉(TRYB)。 稳定资产的市值从2020年初的52亿美元飙升至2022年3月的1501亿美元峰值，随后在整个熊市中逐渐下降。然而，其市值在2024年增长了4.9%，从年初的1282亿美元增至2月1日的1346亿美元。

        重要经济动态

        ▌美国财长：利率高位运行考验美国债务

        美国财政部长耶伦称，利率长远来看维持较高水平的前景，让控制美国借款需求变得更难，凸显出在与共和党议员的预算谈判中着力于增加财政收入的重要性。耶伦表示，“我们已经上调了利率预期，这确实有影响。这使得保持赤字和利息支出处于可控状态变得更具挑战性。”她重申，强调经通胀调整的利息支付相对于GDP这个比率指标。这一比率在过去一年上升，但白宫预计未来十年将稳定在1.3%左右。“我没有硬性规定，但我不希望看到它高于2%，”她说。这是她在这一指标上截至目前最为明确的评论。

        ▌当前加密货币新基金的推出速度远低于2017年的鼎盛时期

        据Crypto Fund Research数据，当前加密货币新基金的推出速度远低于2017年的鼎盛时期，当时每季度约有73只新基金推出，是当年加密基金总数的两倍多。 此外，新基金的融资仍不像以前那么容易。在风险投资方面，新基金的融资规模往往比2021年和2022年要小，因为新进入该领域的投资者较少。根据VisionTrack的数据，第一季度，631笔风险投资交易中仅投资了26.2亿美元。这低于去年同期781笔交易中投资的29亿美元，也只是2021年第一季度817笔交易中投资的72亿美元的一小部分。

        ▌美股三大指数集体收跌，热门科技股多数下跌

        美股三大指数集体收跌，道指跌1.53%，创2023年3月份以来最差单日表现，纳指跌0.39%，标普500指数跌0.74%，热门科技股多数下跌，英伟达逆市涨超9%，英特尔跌超4%，特斯拉、AMD跌超3%，苹果跌超2%，谷歌、亚马逊跌超1%。

          金色百科

          ▌什么是智能合约中的重入攻击？

          在智能合约中，当合约在完成自己的状态更改之前从外部调用另一个合约或函数时，就会发生重入攻击。这允许被调用合约重新进入调用合约，并可能再次执行其部分操作，这可能会导致不可预见且频繁的恶意行为。 例如，合约 A 调用合约 B 发送资金，然后修改自己的状态。合约 B 的代码可能包含一个回调函数，允许其重新进入合约 A，并可能在合约 A 完成其状态更改之前重新执行传输函数。 这将使攻击者能够在完成初始交易之前多次从合约中获取资金。

          免责声明：金色财经作为区块链资讯平台，所发布的文章内容仅供信息参考，不作为实际投资建议。请大家树立正确投资理念，务必提高风险意识。

          Lecturas Relacionadas

          Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

          Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Major Bull Loses $15 Billion On June 25th, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a low of $58,030—its lowest level since October 2024. The sell-off triggered over $1 billion in leveraged liquidations in 24 hours, with longs accounting for $788 million. This marks a more than 53% decline from the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198. A critical factor in the downturn is the weakening position of MicroStrategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. With 847,363 BTC at an average cost of $75,651, the company now faces over $14.6 billion in unrealized losses. Its core financing flywheel—raising capital to buy Bitcoin—is stalling. Its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC), a key fundraising tool, have fallen 25% below their $100 target. This raises doubts about its ability to continue providing steady institutional demand for Bitcoin. Simultaneously, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing significant outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $469 million on June 24th. This represents the most severe sustained capital flight since their launch. The macroeconomic backdrop remains restrictive, with persistent inflation delaying expected Fed rate cuts. Analysts note a shift in capital allocation, with institutional funds moving away from crypto towards AI infrastructure stocks. Immediate pressure comes from approximately $10 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on June 26th, which could increase market volatility. The combined effect of these factors—eroding core demand pillars, macro headwinds, and capital rotation—has decisively broken the $60,000 support level.

          Foresight NewsHace 7 min(s)

          Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

          Foresight NewsHace 7 min(s)

          STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

          The article analyzes whether the STRC (a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy) presents a buying opportunity after its price fell below its $100 par value to around $80, offering a seemingly high yield of 13-15%. The core argument is that STRC's discount reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of MicroStrategy's capital structure model, not just temporary panic. This model relies on issuing securities (like STRC) to raise funds to buy more Bitcoin, a "flywheel" that works in a bull market. The recent small sale of BTC to fund dividends, while minor, broke the psychological "never sell" anchor and signaled potential strain. Key risks identified are not a traditional Ponzi collapse but a potential breakdown in the financing narrative: 1) If Bitcoin enters a deep bear market, crushing MicroStrategy's stock premium (mNAV), its ability to raise cheap capital weakens. 2) If STRC remains deeply discounted, it signifies permanently higher funding costs. 3) The high cash dividend yield represents a significant ongoing expense. 4) If selling BTC to pay dividends becomes routine, the bullish narrative reverses. The conclusion is that STRC is not a risk-free high-yield asset. It is a high-coupon bet on whether MicroStrategy's BTC treasury financing model can withstand a bear market. Buying it is a wager that the market will continue to believe in and fund this structure at acceptable costs. The current price asks if this cycle's "casualty" might be a BTC treasury company's融资 model itself.

          marsbitHace 23 min(s)

          STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

          marsbitHace 23 min(s)

          Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

          **Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Names?** In the crypto world, changing a project's name is common—over 16% of projects have done so, including major ones like Polygon (formerly Matic Network). This contrasts sharply with traditional businesses, which fiercely protect brand equity. The core reason is that in crypto, brand loyalty is often weak. Users are frequently investors, airdrop hunters, or yield seekers, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability, not an asset. Renaming can be a strategic reset to shed this baggage. Name changes serve as a potent marketing tool. They can signal a genuine pivot in strategy or scope (e.g., EthSign dropping "Eth" as it expanded). However, they are often used to "narrative surf," rebranding to align with hot trends like AI, RWA, or the metaverse (e.g., Elrond → MultiversX). Critically, renaming is also a PR tactic to distance a project from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap → Multichain). The most significant risk emerges when a name change is coupled with a token migration or swap. This process can allow projects to reset exchange price charts, erase visible historical downtrends, and create an illusion of a fresh start. It often facilitates liquidity resets, where low float can be exploited for pumps. More alarmingly, migrations sometimes mask overhauls to tokenomics, introducing substantial new token supply through "ecosystem funds" or "node rewards," effectively diluting existing holders. The fundamental issue isn't renaming itself, which can be valid for strategic evolution. The problem is when it functions as an escape from history—a way to avoid accountability for past mistakes, failed promises, and poor performance. When a project announces a rebrand, the critical questions are: What tangible new capability or strategy does it represent? Has the tokenomics changed? And what part of its past is it most trying to make users forget?

          marsbitHace 29 min(s)

          Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

          marsbitHace 29 min(s)

          A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

          Franklin Templeton filed for two ETFs on June 18 that embed a "default option" logic into Bitcoin investing. These funds—the Franklin US Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF and the Franklin US Innovative Equity Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETF—aim to automatically allocate a portion of investor dividends to Bitcoin, initially with a 95% stock and 5% Bitcoin allocation. The mechanism is designed for financial advisors, not retail investors. By packaging Bitcoin exposure within a standard equity fund label, advisors can bypass internal compliance restrictions against direct cryptocurrency allocation for their clients. Dividends from the stock holdings are automatically used to buy Bitcoin via spot ETFs, futures, or options. However, the structure imposes strict rebalancing rules: if Bitcoin's allocation exceeds 5%, it is trimmed back to 4.5% quarterly, with a hard cap of 20%. This means the fund becomes a systematic seller during Bitcoin price rallies. Realistically, the potential buying pressure is minimal. Based on dividend yields (approximately 1.05% for broad market, 0.52% for innovative equity), the annual inflow into Bitcoin would be a tiny fraction of the fund's assets. For comparison, Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF ($359 million AUM) would generate only about $3.6 million in annual Bitcoin purchases—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. The innovative equity fund, heavily weighted in low-dividend stocks like Nvidia, would have even weaker buying power. The product utilizes an offshore Cayman subsidiary to hold Bitcoin, a common compliance tactic for commodity exposure in mutual funds. A key drawback for investors is the tax liability: they must pay taxes on dividends that are automatically converted into Bitcoin, requiring out-of-pocket cash for a gain they never directly receive. For the strategy to scale significantly, such funds would need to become a default or near-default option in retirement plans like 401(k)s. Recent regulatory moves, including a Trump executive order and a Department of Labor proposal offering fiduciary safe harbors for including crypto assets, could pave the way. However, widespread employer adoption likely awaits further legal clarity. Ultimately, the fund's model leverages investor inertia and automated systems, rather than convincing anyone to actively choose Bitcoin. While it creates a new, albeit small, structural buyer, its rebalancing rules also establish a built-in "selling ceiling" that could dampen price upside if similar products proliferate.

          Foresight NewsHace 31 min(s)

          A Trillion-Dollar Entry Point for Pension Funds? Franklin's Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETFs Come with a Built-In Selling Pressure Ceiling

          Foresight NewsHace 31 min(s)

          Why Do Crypto Projects Always Love Changing Names?

          This article explores why cryptocurrency projects frequently change their names, a practice uncommon in traditional businesses where brand equity is a core asset. Over 16% of crypto projects have reportedly rebranded, often for strategic, marketing, or defensive reasons. The primary explanation is the weak user loyalty in crypto; many users are investors, airdrop hunters, or narrative traders, not traditional consumers. When a project's token price falls, its narrative fades, or it faces scandals/hacks, its old name becomes a liability laden with negative history rather than brand value. Therefore, frequent rebranding aims to shed this historical baggage. Name changes can be a marketing strategy to align with new business directions (e.g., Matic to Polygon), capitalize on trending narratives (e.g., adding "AI" or "Multiverse"), or distance from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap to Multichain). However, the most concerning aspect often involves a simultaneous token migration or swap. This process can serve as a "liquidity reset": it wipes historical price charts, potentially eases market manipulation, and is sometimes used to introduce new tokenomics that dilute existing holders' value through hidden inflation. The article concludes that while legitimate strategic pivots can justify a rebrand, many crypto name changes are less about building a new future and more about escaping the past—erasing bad memories, failed narratives, and dissatisfied communities. The key questions for any rebranding project are: what genuine new value or strategy does it bring, how has the tokenomics changed, and what part of its history is it trying to make users forget?

          链捕手Hace 38 min(s)

          Why Do Crypto Projects Always Love Changing Names?

          链捕手Hace 38 min(s)

          Trading

          Spot
          Futuros
          活动图片