10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-07-08Actualizado a 2024-07-08

Resumen

包括技术指标、社媒指数、宏观数据等范畴。

原文作者:cyclop, 加密 KOL

原文编译:Felix, PANews

随着加密市场暴跌,恐惧与贪婪指数目前为 26 ,几乎创一年以来新低。上一次处于这一水平时,SOL 还在 11 美元。以往在 2023 年 1 月、 2023 年 9 月、 2022 年 7 月,该指数也出现过如此之低,随后市场开启上涨行情。所有人都说要在“在贪婪时卖出,在恐惧时买入”,但实际上只有 1% 的人这么做。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

许多人认为牛市已经结束,但加密 KOL cyclop 认为,牛市甚至尚未开始。cyclop 为何如此信誓旦旦?以下是其列举的 10 个参考指标。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

稳定币指数

该指数追踪进入加密市场的新资本。目前远未达到前几个周期的水平。一旦流动性增加,市场就会相应增长。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

交易量

尽管比特币的价格较高,但与 2021 年相比,现在的交易量要低得多。散户参与度极低,因此一旦散户参与度增加,市场就会上涨。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

YT 指标(YouTube 浏览量)

与上一个周期相比,YT 指标降低了约 5 倍。2021 年比特币价值 7 万美元,每天的浏览量为 400 万次。现在,比特币价格为 7 万美元,每天的浏览量约为 80 万次。这表明散户投资者的兴趣仍然很低,还有上涨空间。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

BTC.D(比特币市值占比)

下图显示 BTC 市值占加密货币总市值的百分比。自 4 月以来,BTC.D 一直在 54% 至 57% 的区间内盘整。一旦 BTC.D 跌破该区间,将标志着山寨币季节的开始。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

Coinbase 下载排名

当 Coinbase 成为下载量最高的应用程序时,从历史上看,就预示着该退出市场了。这一趋势可能会重演,但目前还远未实现。(下图显示,目前排名第 13)

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

谷歌趋势

谷歌趋势中关于比特币、加密货币或山寨币的搜索数据显示,目前仍远低于 2021 年的水平。纵观过去 5 年的全球趋势,当前的搜索兴趣比 2021 年低 2.5 倍。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

美联储趋势

下图显示,当美联储注入流动性时:买入资产,资产负债趋势上升,反之亦然。遵循这一趋势至关重要,因为这种逆转将增加传统金融市场的流动性,然后是加密市场。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

全球净流动性指数

该指标监测各国央行和美联储储备的资产。全球流动性目前正处于盘整阶段。然而,图表表明变化即将来临。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

VC 投资

项目的风险投资反映了市场的兴趣。融资高峰出现在 2021 年,与周期的峰值相吻合。如今这一数字低了四倍。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

加密总市值(不包括前 10 名)

OTHERS/BTC(不包括前 10 名的加密货币总市值)是山寨币市场行情的真实体现。目前,这一水平甚至比 2023 年 12 月还低,说明主要的增长还在后面。

如果你认为是疯了才相信这一点,那么你要明白,即使是 GCR 也是看涨的。

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

10项数据解读当前市场:牛市尚未真正开启?

Lecturas Relacionadas

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片