MATR1X FIRE启动「无限游戏」计划,将燃烧5亿枚$FIRE代币

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-06-22Actualizado a 2024-06-22

Resumen

「无限游戏」计划分为三个阶段,旨在通过创新的分发和燃烧机制,升级$FIRE的经济循环和拓展更多应用场景。

MATR1X FIRE 宣布启动”无限游戏”计划,总共将燃烧 5 亿枚$FIRE 代币 。“无限游戏”计划分为三个阶段,旨在通过创新的分发和燃烧机制,升级$FIRE 的经济循环和拓展更多应用场景,为$FIRE 构建一个健康、多样且强大的生态系统。

MATR1X FIRE启动「无限游戏」计划,将燃烧5亿枚$FIRE代币

第一阶段:萤火虫

时间:$FIRE TGE 后 7 个月内

目标:通过有效分发和燃烧机制,为$FIRE 未来的增长打下坚实基础。

初始总量限定 10 亿枚:$FIRE 的初始总量为 10 亿枚,具体内容请参见白皮书的 FIRE 部分(白皮书链接)。

启动燃烧机制:Apollo 计划中所有消耗的$FIRE 都将被燃烧销毁,并同步降低$FIRE 的总量上限。

燃烧 80% 团队代币:创始团队持有的$FIRE 将从 2500 万枚减少至 500 万枚,减少的 2000 万枚$FIRE 将被燃烧,并同步降低$FIRE 的总量上限。

第二阶段:火烈鸟

时间:TGE 之后的 7-24 个月内

目标:扩大$FIRE 的应用场景,加速燃烧,降低$FIRE 的总量上限,直至总量降低至 5 亿

动态调整产出速率:$FIRE 将通过有效的工作量证明逐渐产出,并根据生态用户规模进行动态调整。

新增燃烧机制:游戏生态经济行为将加速$FIRE 的燃烧,并降低$FIRE 的总量上限,直至总量降至 5 亿。

新增应用场景:更多游戏产品中将引入$FIRE 的使用。

第三阶段:凤凰

时间:TGE 24 个月后(取决于生态的发展)

目标:升级游戏的经济循环,拓展游戏生态多样性,实现$FIRE 代币的全流通

经济循环升级:各类应用行为(如游戏产品、电竞产品、交易市场和社区产品)消耗的$FIRE 将进入特定池子,为有效的工作量证明提供长期激励。

金融工具衍生:更多金融机制将出现,使$FIRE 在游戏生态中更高效地流通。

Lecturas Relacionadas

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

The price of STRC, Strategy's dividend-paying preferred stock, has fallen below its $100 face value, triggering a re-evaluation of the "bitcoin treasury" corporate model. This highlights a critical tension: the company's asset base consists of high-volatility, non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin, while its capital structure requires continuous cash payouts for dividends and interest. The decline of STRC signals that market pressure is shifting from asset price volatility to the pricing of the company's financing tools. Strategy's core model involves a three-step conversion: turning equity into Bitcoin exposure, converting Bitcoin holdings into capital market credit, and packaging non-yielding BTC into cash-paying securities like STRC. While Strategy holds a massive 847,363 BTC, the focus is now on cash flow mismatches. The company faces annual preferred stock dividend obligations of approximately $1.7 billion, far exceeding the cash flow from its legacy software business. Its ability to meet these obligations relies on continued access to capital markets. The market is now scrutinizing which of three potential costs becomes untenable first: rising dividend costs to attract investors, dilution costs from issuing more common stock, or the reputational cost of selling BTC—a move contrary to its "hodl" narrative. For the broader crypto market, a constrained Strategy means the potential loss of a predictable, narrative-driven marginal buyer for Bitcoin. The STRC discount serves as a reminder that the longevity of such models depends not just on Bitcoin's price, but also on financing windows, cash reserves, and investor willingness to pay a "trust premium" for the structure.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

STRC 跌破面值,比特币财库实验进入下半场

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片