CyberConnect品牌升级为Cyber,L2 主网上线助其迈向更宏大的社交图景

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-05-16Actualizado a 2024-05-16

Resumen

品牌升级+社交L2主网上线,Cyber进入赛博社交图景新阶段。

原创|Odaily星球日报

作者|Wenser

CyberConnect品牌升级为Cyber,L2 主网上线助其迈向更宏大的社交图景

5 月 15 日,Web 3 社交网络协议 CyberConnect 宣布社交 L2 网络主网正式上线,且品牌升级为 Cyber,后续将与再质押 Rollups 平台 Altlayer 展开多维度合作,借助行业模块化解决方案,连接更多 L2 网络。Cyber 致力于将链上社交协议和以开发者为中心的产品结合,以此实现在原有的社交图谱的基础上,打造去中心化社交网络图景,此外,Web3 原生社交平台 Link 3 作为独立品牌分拆出来进行发展规划。Odaily星球日报将带领大家一道了解社交 L2 网络 Cyber 的相关信息。

为社交而生:Cyber L2 主网上线

坎昆升级完成后,L2 网络的进入门槛以及性能表现得到了进一步的优化,使得赛道型 L2 网络成为可能。基于以往社交图谱的相关积累以及更好地满足社交应用需求的愿景,Cyber L2 主网应运而生。具体而言,其主要特点包括以下 3 个方面:

首先,从进入门槛和使用体验层面来说。

一方面,Cyber L2 主网通过原生账户抽象(AA)和熟悉的认证方法(如 Passkey 和 Webauthn )为用户提供了顺畅的 Web2 登录及使用体验,允许用户通过多种方式(如 FaceID)访问钱包账户。同时,Cyber 智能账户支持 gas 赞助,进一步降低了用户的摩擦成本,使低成本、高 TPS 和无缝的 Web2 用户体验成为可能。另外一方面,Cyber 的本地部署定制功能为开发者创建贴近 Web2 体验的社交应用提供了良好支持,同时能够发挥 Web3 生态的流动性、金融性等优势。

其次,从技术实现与生态拓展层面来说。

Cyber L2 主网基于 Optimism 的开源标准代码库 OP Stack 构建,加入了 Base、Mode 以及众多 OP 生态的 L2、L3网络,成为了 Optimism 超级链的一部分,不仅能够吸引更多用户加入 Cyber 的社交数据网络和应用生态,促进链上经济和用户基础权利的全面发展,而且 Cyber 还将把其排序器产生的一部分收入返还给 Optimism Collective,用于资助公共物品和网络开发,反哺 OP 生态的后续拓展。

最后,从应用安全及去中心化层面来说。

借助 Altlayer 的 Rollup 等技术支持,Cyber L2 主网将作为首批在主网上部署 Plasma Mode 的 OP Stack 链之一,利用以太坊主网上的替代数据可用性(DA)层,显著降低交易成本,同时更好平衡安全性和去中心化。后续 Cyber 还将在合适时机迁移至 EigenDA,以为用户提供更高的可扩展性和降低交互操作成本。此外,由 EigenLayer AVS (主动验证服务)提供支持的去中心化存储解决方案 CyberDB 还将助力生态应用从跨生态系统的大规模社交数据中受益,进一步简化开发者工作流程。通过与众多合作方共同打造的各项基础设施,Cyber 将发挥自身协议网络及生态应用的优势,以此部分替代中心化公司借助用户数据牟利而提供的免费社交产品。

在主网正式上线后,Cyber L2 网络将加速推进 Web3 社交网络完成从二维的社交图谱过渡至三维的社交图景的升级迭代。

CyberConnect品牌升级为Cyber,L2 主网上线助其迈向更宏大的社交图景

Cyber 官方宣传信息

回顾过往:速览 Cyber 项目发展史

回望 Cyber 这一社交领域标志性项目的过往,一路走来,从社交图谱协议,到社交平台 Link 3 的推出,再到作为币安 Launchpool 项目成功实现代币上线,如今的社交 L2 网络主网的上线更像是为下一个新阶段做出准备的阶段性里程碑。

2021 年 11 月 17 日,CyberConnect 通过股权和 SAFT(未来代币简单协议)完成 1000 万美元种子轮融资,Multicoin Capital 和 Sky 9 Capital 共同领投,Animoca Brands、DraperDragon、Hashed、Zoo Capital、Smrti Lab 和 Mask Network 等参投。

2022 年 5 月 17 日,Web3去中心化社交图谱协议 CyberConnect 宣布完成 1500 万美元 A 轮融资,本轮融资由 Animoca Brands、Sky 9 Capital 共同领投,IOSG Ventures、Delphi Digital、Protocol Labs、Tribe Capital、GGV Capital、Spartan Group、Amber Group、Polygon Studios 和 SevenX Ventures 参投。

2023 年 5 月 19 日,Web3社交图谱协议 CyberConnect 通过 CoinList 公募融资 540 万美元,来自 112 个国家和地区的 53.2 万名用户参与了此次公募,最终, 11540 名参与者以 1.8 美元/枚的价格,购买了可供出售的 300 万枚 CYBER。

2023 年 7 月 15 日,CyberConnect 宣布发布 v3版本,并计划将在未来 2 个月完成 6 个 EVM 兼容网络部署。v3核心是希望将 CyberConnect 打造成全链社交协议,其核心组件包括:兼容 ERC-4337 的身份基础设施 CyberAccount、记录用户内容和社交关系的抗审查数据库 Cyber Graph 以及多链解决方案 CyberNetwork。

2023 年 8 月 4 日,CyberConnect 发文介绍社区奖励第一季,且开放空投查询网页,用户可通过官方网站查询空投资格及数量。

2023 年 8 月 14 日,据币安官方公告,将于 2023 年 8 月 15 日 20: 00 (东八区时间)上线 CyberConnect(CYBER),并开放 CYBER/BNB、CYBER/BTC、CYBER/FDUSD、CYBER/TRY、CYBER/USDT 交易对。

2023 年 8 月 15 日,CYBER 空投于北京时间 20 点正式开放申领,开放时间为期 30 天。当晚 CYBER 代币币安开盘价为 1.44 美元,一度暴涨至 17.79 美元。

CyberConnect品牌升级为Cyber,L2 主网上线助其迈向更宏大的社交图景

币安界面

2023 年 10 月 15 日,Binance Labs Fund 发文表示,已经对去中心化社交网络 CyberConnect 进行一轮后续投资。

2024 年 3 月 8 日,CyberConnect 宣布,在 EigenLayer 和 Optimism 的支持下与 AltLayer 合作推出支持再抵押的模块化以太坊 L2 网络 Cyber,将充当 Web3 应用程序社交层。据悉,CYBER 质押已上线,Cyber Sepolia 测试网将于下周推出。

2024 年 3 月 17 日,CyberConnect 官方宣布,质押计划正式启动,用户可质押 CYBER 来维护 Layer 2 网络安全并参与治理。目前 CYBER 第 2 季奖励已开放,参与质押即可活动奖励,总奖池达 100 万枚 CYBER。3 月 18 日,据官方消息,CYBER 质押数量在正式上线后两日内突破 100 万枚。根据官方数据显示,截至目前已质押超过 390 万枚,总计有超过 38000 个独立地址质押。

2024 年 3 月 25 日,去中心化社交网络协议 CyberConnect 宣布推出价值 200 万美元生态系统资助计划,以增强社区主导的创新并加速链上社交和 Web3 的采用,该计划将以原生代币 CYBER 提供。

2024 年 4 月 10 日,CyberConnect 宣布推出由 EigenLayer 和流动性再质押协议支持的新功能 Cyber Restaking,用户可以通过存入流动性再质押代币(LRT)资产,获得包括 ETH 质押收益、ETH 再质押收益、EigenLayer 积分、LRT 积分和 Cyber Restaking 积分等回报。

2024 年 5 月 4 日,CyberConnect 宣布生态 Grants Pilot Round 获奖项目名单,共计 6 个项目获得总额为价值 17 万美元的 CYBER 代币奖励。

2024 年 5 月 15 日,CyberConnect 宣布品牌重塑为社交 L2 项目 Cyber 并上线主网

在历时长达 3 年左右的生态建设与技术积累的基础上,结合当下 L2 网络如火如荼的发展态势,可以说 Cyber 迈出这一步绝非盲目跟风,而是经过对后续项目发展方向深思熟虑之后做出的必要选择。

当技术条件、生态条件、外部条件都已成熟时,Cyber 主网将极大地扩展与其他网络生态的可组合性和链上经济接驳体系。

以 Cyber 之名:重塑赛博空间社交格局

截止撰稿时,据 Dune 数据显示,Cyber L2 网络已质押代币数量已接近 400 万枚 CYBER,其中 OP 网络质押数量最多,高达 264 万枚 CYBER。

CyberConnect品牌升级为Cyber,L2 主网上线助其迈向更宏大的社交图景

Dune 数据面板

在时间点进入 2024 年的当下,Web3 社交赛道逐渐从以往的协议竞争,过渡到了生态应用比拼,因此,对于 Cyber 这样的头部社交协议来说,目标也从过往着眼于“ Cyber Connection ” ,迭代为赛博空间的“ Network Building ”。

而这,自然离不开 Cyber L2 主网的基础支撑与更多应用产品的涌现,具体而言,Cyber 的准备与计划包括以下 2 个部分:

第一,Cyber 旗下的拳头产品 Link 3 品牌分拆独立运营。

作为“Web3 版 Linktree+LinkedIn”,Link 3 一直都是 Cyber 生态的代表性产品及社交平台,但过往处于 CyberConnect 协议之中,因而市场定位较为模糊,更像是一款“为了展会协议而打造的样板性产品”,后续品牌分拆独立运营将有望改变这一局面,让 Link 3 成为更纯粹的社交平台,产品定位更为聚焦,产品功能迭代也将更为明确。

第二, 200 万美元激励资金助力开发者生态发展完善。

在 Cyber L2 主网上线后,结合既定的 200 万美元生态系统资助计划,Cyber 网络的社交生态将吸引众多开发者的目光,此前包括游戏见解平台 Bitmon、促进人机交互和共同创造的综合社交网络 CharacterX、NFT 市场和聚合器 Element、基于 ERC-4337 的 UserOp 浏览器 JiffyScan、基于 ERC-4337 的钱包管理工具 UseSnaaps、AI 驱动的社媒平台 XO 等获奖项目就是一个不错的开始。

可以说,Cyber 将要打造的 L2 网络生态,不是官方项目的“一枝独秀”,而是鼓励更多社交应用开发者参与进来的“百花齐放”。

以用户为中心:重视每一个社交节点

值得一提的是,Cyber L2 主网上线只是新生态发力的起点,去中心化社交网络的丰富与完善离不开以用户个体为中心的众多“社交节点”的加入。

相较于传统的 Web2 社交网络,去中心化的 Web3 社交网络的存在、发展与价值增长更加离不开每一个看似微小的节点的支持。

从群体角色层面来说,Web3 社交节点主要具备以下特点:

  • 一是数据属性,正是由于众多用户的存在,一个社交网络才拥有了源源不断的各类数据,支撑不同维度的数据分析,通过数据集群得以挖掘数据背后的价值。

  • 二是身份属性,社交节点往往拥有一定的聚集效应,而身份属性正是支撑社交网络逐步扩展、裂变乃至膨胀的原生动力之一,不同的身份将为社交网络带来不同的内容以及流动性。

  • 三是资产属性,Web3 的社交网络通常离不开诸多网络以及原生代币资产支撑的交互体系,而这正是 Web3 人群区别于传统社交人群的一大关键,资产属性为具备高度交互价值的网络建设奠定了基础。

去中心化社交网络中的众多用户不仅扮演着社交节点的角色,更是维护网络稳定运行、安全运转的重中之重,他们的价值远比看似简单的“数据集”更重要。

据官方消息,Cyber 后续将于 6 月开启“社交夏季”活动,鼓励社交用户参与 L2 生态交互与应用体验,借此,用户可以通过生态价值回馈获取一定的经济回报,还能够为互相验证、互相赋能的去中心化网络增加一道由微观个体组成的“保险”。

未来展望:社交 L2 网络 Cyber 将成为 L2 网络的“节点交换器”

L2Beat 网站数据显示,目前各大 L2 网络总 TVL 已高达 392 亿美元,但颇为可惜的是,除了资产层面的流动交换以外,众多 L2 网络仍然处于“孤岛状态”,不同网络生态的用户在社交关系、社交数据、社交价值等方面的交互动作极为有限,这一现状也在某种层面上来说成为限制各大 L2 网络进行进一步的价值交换、网络互通的桎梏。

Cyber L2 主网的上线或将改变这一僵化局面。

CyberConnect品牌升级为Cyber,L2 主网上线助其迈向更宏大的社交图景

L2 Beat 网站信息

从应用层面的社交关系,到生态层面的社交数据,再到区块链网络层面的社交资源,Cyber L2 主网在努力实现从以往的二维社交图谱向构建新的三维社交图景的转换,通过跨越多个区块链网络生态的底层协议与越发丰富的社交应用产品,“共建共享、共创共治”的链上社区、链上社会的理想,或许将慢慢从构想转换为现实。

Cyber L2 主网,有望以 L2 网络的“节点交换器”的角色,从社交领域开始,为以太坊网络生态、再质押赛道以及网络主权空间做出属于自己的贡献。

让我们持续关注,共同期待那一天的到来。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar CYBER

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar CYBER (CYBER) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar CYBER (CYBER) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu CYBER (CYBER)Después de comprar tu CYBER (CYBER), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear CYBER (CYBER)Tradear fácilmente con CYBER (CYBER) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

179 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar CYBER

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de CYBER (CYBER).

活动图片