SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-04-02Actualizado a 2024-04-02

Resumen

市场从长周末回归,许多资产类别却迎来突然的避险情绪。meme-coin 仍然盛行,而 BTC 价格在过去一个月基本在 7 万左右徘徊,但出现了相当多次的多头清算。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

市场从长周末回归,许多资产类别却迎来突然的避险情绪,而 Powell 主席在上周五传达的信息也令人困惑,就在一周前他还持明显的鸽派立场,然而这次他却表示经济有足够的韧性来应对当前的利率水平。Powell 的谈话发生在 PCE 数据公布后,他发表了诸如“我们不需要著急”和“考虑到美国经济增长如此稳健,就业市场仍然非常强劲,让我们有机会在采取降息这一重要步骤之前,对通胀的下降更有信心”等评论。主席听起来并不急于降息,是因为上次 FOMC 会议的鸽派表现受到很多内部阻力(如 Waller 等)吗?或是选举年的谈话受到政治压力的影响?还是他对市场对其先前谈话的鸽派反应感到震惊?我们也没有答案。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

过去几天的经济数据也不支持降息叙事,ISM 制造业指数自 2022 年来首次扩张,特别是在就业、支付价格和新出口订单部分显著优于预期。近期的通胀数据也显示美国核心通胀仍维持在较高水平, 6 个月滚动的超级核心 CPI 逼近 6% ,甚至核心 PCE 也回升至 3% 以上,远超过美联储的目标值。此外,S&P Global PMI 指数随附的声明称,“由于工厂将更高的成本转嫁给客户,生产商收取的平均售价以 11 个月来最快的速度上涨,通胀率远高于疫情前的平均水平” ,这听起来不像是通胀放缓的趋势。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

尽管风险情绪相当友好且 Powell 态度支持,但 10 年期美债收益率今年一直在稳步上升。2 月时市场还认为 6 月降息是板上钉钉,但如今定价所反映的降息可能性已回落至 55% 左右。不过由于美联储近期的点阵图指引,期货市场仍顽固地预测 2024 年会有 3 次降息,然而,如果经济数据继续按照当前的轨迹发展,鸽派叙事可能会面临越来越大的挑战。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

非农就业数据将于本周五发布,市场普遍预期就业人口变动将放缓至 20 万人,而失业率将稳定维持在 3.8% ,每小时工资环比将保持在 0.3% ,如果数据结果如市场预期,应该有利于风险情绪,SPX 期权跨式所反映的日波动约为 0.8% ,与先前的非农就业发布日一致。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

就季节性而言, 4 月对股市来说往往较具挑战性,尤其是在月中,被评为一年中表现最差的 5 周之一。除了本周五非农就业数据和 10 号的 CPI 数据,这个月的经济数据相对清淡,因此如果 CPI 数据不友好,将有机会引发本月底的避险走势。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

在加密货币方面,meme-coin 仍然盛行,而 BTC 价格在过去一个月基本在 7 万左右徘徊,但出现了相当多次的多头清算。由于仓位一面倒,多头资金费率仍然高昂,亚洲时段的价格走势往往更为负面(例如今早跌至 6.6 万美元以下),而纽约时段则因 ETF 资金流入的支持(昨天 + 1.83 亿),价格走势更为正面。我们是否只是在目睹一个长期的再分配交易,也就是原生用户积累长期仓位,并通过 ETF 慢慢出售给主流投资者,但近期并没有太多显著成果?随著加密货币价格的势头似乎开始减弱,要注意风险情绪可能出现下滑。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240402):美国通胀压力再次攀升

您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ,获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:xdengalin)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website:https://www.signalplus.com

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight NewsHace 8 min(s)

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight NewsHace 8 min(s)

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报Hace 12 min(s)

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报Hace 12 min(s)

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片