SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-03-28Actualizado a 2024-03-28

Resumen

数字货币在美股开盘后不久后出现一次波动,BTC价格一度触碰到72000美元关口后迅速下跌至68500附近,造成此次波动行情的原因可能包括美国地区法官裁定SEC针对Coinbase的诉讼准以继续。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

昨日(27 MAR)美联储沃勒在盘后发表鹰派讲话,表示目前没有迫切需要降息的迹象,维持当前利率水准的时间可能比预期较长,今年降息的次数或减少,同时他也称希望看到至少几个月的通胀数据好转然后再降息,今晚的核心 PCE 数据将成为本次讲话后的第一份重要通胀数据,且看其环比是否能如市场预期一般放缓至 0.3% 以下,展现出一个良好的转变。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

Source: SignalPlus, Economic Calendar

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

Source: SignalPlus & TradingView

数字货币在美股开盘后不久后出现一次波动,BTC 价格一度触碰到 72000 美元关口后迅速下跌至 68500 附近,造成此次波动行情的原因可能包括美国地区法官裁定 SEC 针对 Coinbase 的诉讼准以继续,使其股价下跌并同时给 BTC 价格带来压力。但随后价格稳步反弹收复全部失地,重新来到 70000 美元上方,提振了市场的信心,从期权数据上可以看到,尽管 Vol Surface 没有发生明显的变动,但 BTC 和 ETH 的交易记录中大都呈现出方向性统一的 Long Call/Call Spread 以及 Short Put/Put Spread 策略,如 BTC 26 APR 24 70000/85000 Call Spread(850 BTC per leg)以及 Sell ETH 26 APR 24 2800 Put(11237 ETH from Deribit)

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

Source: Deribit (截至 28 MAR 16: 00 UTC+ 8)

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

Source: SignalPlus

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

Data Source: Deribit,ETH 交易分布

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

Data Source: Deribit,BTC 交易分布

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240328):重整旗鼓,继续向上

您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ,获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:xdengalin)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website:https://www.signalplus.com

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片