Fewer Than 30% of Jurisdictions Globally Have Started Regulating Crypto: FATF Chief

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-03-27Actualizado a 2024-03-28

Resumen

The finding, termed a "call to action" by T. Raja Kumar, emerged from a report that explored which jurisdictions have adhered to the FATF's recommendations.

  • A lack of regulation "creates significant loopholes for both criminals and terrorists to exploit" and is "a call to action that we need countries to take this problem seriously," Financial Action Task Force President T. Raja Kumar said in an interview with CoinDesk.
  • FATF published a new report evaluating jurisdictions on their crypto regulation after a 12-month process involving FATF's 39 members and 20 jurisdictions that aren't members.

Fewer than 30% of jurisdictions around the globe had started regulating the crypto sector as of June 2023, Financial Action Task Force (FATF) President T. Raja Kumar told CoinDesk in an interview from Singapore.

That low level of attention warrants "call to action," said Raja Kumar. The statistic was detailed in a progress report made public on Thursday and shared with CoinDesk, which explored how dozens of jurisdictions have adhered to the FATF's recommendations.

The report is titled "Status of Implementation of Recommendation 15 by FATF Members and Jurisdictions with Materially Important VASP Activity." The recommendation had suggested that jurisdictions should move to get a better handle on money-laundering and terrorist-financing risks posed by crypto, and they should license or register virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and conduct reviews of their business practices, products and technology.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The FATF recommendations are not mandatory, but non-abiding jurisdictions could face global isolation through drops in their credibility ratings and other actions, such as the repercussions of being put on the FATF's watchlist.

The crypto sector has faced a credibility and safety crisis as it's been beset by hacks, many of which are linked to North Korea, sanctions from the U.S. and the U.N., and allegations of being a conduit for terrorist financing, including for those aiding Hamas and ISIS.

Advertisement
Advertisement

FATF's 'call to action'

The boss of the global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog said it was "the first such report" addressing the concern that a lack of regulation "creates significant loopholes for both criminals and terrorists to exploit" and is "a call to action that we need countries to take this problem seriously."

"I would describe virtual assets as being akin to water, and essentially they will flow to jurisdictions that are less regulated," Raja Kumar said. "Criminals and terrorists are very quick to spot the opportunity leading to regulatory arbitrage. We just can't allow this. Every part of the global chain needs to be strong. This is not a trivial matter."

Purpose of report

The FATF chief said the report is meant to bring global attention to the issue as a "constructive" effort to inform regulators and the private sector about what's going on with the group's standards.

"Virtual assets are inherently international and borderless, meaning a failure to regulate VASPs in one jurisdiction can have serious global implications," the report said.

In one example, the report referred to "the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s (DPRK) theft and laundering of hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of virtual assets," which have been said to be used for "weapons of mass destruction."

It also noted the increasing use of cryptocurrencies to raise and move funds for terrorist groups. The report contended that bad actors were 'almost exclusively' demanding ransomware payments in cryptocurrencies.

Compliance levels of jurisdictions

The FATF has been urging jurisdictions to fully implement its recommendations for some time now. The table in the report rates each jurisdiction as compliant, largely compliant, partially compliant, or non-compliant.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The criteria include enacting legislation or regulation requiring the licensing or registration of VASPs, having registered or licensed such businesses, conducting supervisory inspections, taking enforcement actions against VASPs or enacting the travel rule for them.

FATF's controversial "travel rule" requires crypto service providers to collect and share information on transactions above a certain threshold.

In several cases such as India, Singapore, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Malaysia, their assessments around compliance with Recommendation 15 are ongoing so the table rated them as N/A (not applicable). Other nations, such as Argentina, had conducted a risk assessment covering VASPs but had not completed any of the other seven relevant criteria.

North Korea is blacklisted by the FATF, while Russia's membership was suspended in Feb. 2023.

Raja Kumar said the FATF isn't demanding jurisdictions implement their recommendations by passing laws but that notifications from the government could be enough.

Methodology

At a FATF plenary held in February 2024, the group agreed to publish an overview of the steps jurisdictions have taken to regulate VASPs, resulting in this analysis. The 12-month examination took a look at the FATF's 39 members and 20 other jurisdictions who host materially important crypto-related activities.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The selection of "materially important" jurisdictions was based on jurisdictions that hosted VASPs with more than 0.25% of global virtual asset trading volume or that had at least one million virtual asset users.

Collectively, those jurisdictions accounted for 97% of global crypto activity.

Edited by Jesse Hamilton and Nikhilesh De.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片