SMOLE上线惊喜变惊魂,MEME预售概念全线熄火,是时候回归价值了

PanewsPublicado a 2024-03-25Actualizado a 2024-03-25

Resumen

参与预售类的Meme币,本质上属于一种极小概率的投机,是加密圈投机和FOMO情绪极致的演绎,而其回报率可能甚至不如买彩票,是时候停止并回归价值了。

作者:Frank,PANews
3月17日,加密艺术家Dekadente(推特ID:@0xDekadente)在推特上发布了这样一条内容:
“Solana Memecoin预售现在开始!
发送SOL到:BL1gBdtuYRYSepKKpoy1GCNSmS1JeGSiNb7tdB2HQzor
最低1 SOL   50%预售和50% LP。所有的SOL都将转换为LP并且LP将被销毁。RT和奖励乘数的投放地址。24小时内结束!”
这条推特有超过480万次浏览,而通过这次募资该地址获得了169,982个SOL代币,价值超过3200万美元。
随后几天,该项目因各种原因迟迟未能如约发行代币和空投,直到3月21日下午该项目发行的代币SMOLE才匆匆上线。
只有惊魂没有惊喜的行为艺术
Meme币的预售是最近在推特上一种新的流行玩法,最早由一位名为Darkfarms的Pepe Meme图的创作者发起。Darkfarms在3月10日试图发起一个募资额为500-600枚SOL的新Meme币BOME(BOOK OF MEME),但随后粉丝的热情将这个数字定格在10131枚SOL。随后,Darkfarms将这笔金额全部打入LP池,打造了几乎是流动性最足的Meme币。这一举动引发了广泛的讨论和认可,BOME币随后也在几天内上涨约577倍。在造富效应发生后,越来越多的加密艺术家或KOL开始模仿这种预售模式,以至于Solana链上发行的Meme币在3月15日达到了9943个。
Dekadente是NFT项目CryptoCheems和DystoPunks的创作者,CryptoCheems项目过去180天在Opensea上仅有1交易完成,成交价在21年最高点为2.77 ETH,最近一笔的成交价为0.15 ETH。可以说,CryptoCheems和DystoPunks似乎并不算是出圈的NFT作品,但这不影响其作者Dekadente在新一轮Meme预售模式中玩的风生水起。
据Dekadente在推特表示:“许多人要求我在Solana上创建一个memecoin,因为我的第一个NFT收藏品是一个梗”。随后,他在推特上发起了投票,有73.4%的人表示肯定他发行一个Meme币的预售。
在Dekadente的预售中,并无代币发送数量的限额,只限制了24个小时。甚至Dekadente还不断鼓励大家多次发送,或者发送大金额的SOL代币。
“有人刚刚发送了1700多个SOL,一个小额交易” Dekadente这样写道。
在预售后的几天内,Dekadente表示无法在Raydium上添加LP池,因此迟迟没有空投和发行代币。这也引发了社群不少用户的担心,毕竟这种纯属自愿的打钱行为可能很难得到法律的保障。
人性实验终归不敌人性
开盘后的SMOLE并未再续前几日Meme预售币的传奇,仅仅在开盘冲高翻倍后就立刻下跌。其市值最高达到了惊人的2.2亿美元,市值排名已经达到Meme币的前20名。如果能够复刻类似BOME的涨幅(涨幅100倍),那么意味着其市值可能将高达百亿美元以上。只不过,对于充满预期的用户来说,不幸的是SMOLE在开盘后4小时左右的时间便跌至开盘价左右,几乎破发。
不管怎么说,给Dekadente打钱的用户是幸运的,这位艺术家至少没有提桶跑路。

SMOLE上线惊喜变惊魂,MEME预售概念全线熄火,是时候回归价值了


但另一群用户可能就没有这么幸运,不少打钱募资的项目在收到募资款后直接销声匿迹,让用户血本无归。
3月17日,一个Solbot的项目在发布预售币消息后获得多个推特蓝V支持与转发,最终募集了2870个SOL。项目方将其中1717枚SOL放入流动池后,该项目的推特号被封禁。而该代币在短暂拉升后迅速下跌,截至3月21日,距离高点已经下跌超过99%。剩余的1,153枚SOL(价值21.7万美元)则仍在项目方的钱包里,没有任何回应与答复。

SMOLE上线惊喜变惊魂,MEME预售概念全线熄火,是时候回归价值了


类似的案例在近几天内不胜枚举。但由于缺乏有效的监管环境,大多数亏损的用户也默默认亏,并寄希望于可以投中某个可以暴富的预售项目。据ZachXBT不完全统计,Solana链上的33个项目,本轮共募资796,000个SOL(1.49亿美元)。截至3月20日,此中仍有近一半的项目未能兑现发行代币的承诺。Solana联合创始人Toly也转发ZachXBT的统计,呼吁投资者停止这样做。
一场对价值投资者的嘲讽?
透过喧闹的背后,或许应该客观的对这一轮Meme币的预售进行关于本质的探讨。
从加密圈层出不穷的融资形式来看,这种直接发送地址,然后让用户打钱的方式似乎已经成为最简洁的融资方式。信任建立的基础,不再依靠白皮书,项目规划或豪华的团队。这也是令许多实际开发产品的团队十分沮丧的事。
究其原因的背后,可能并不意味着建立信任的成本变得廉价。反而是整个加密行业缺乏信任环境的缩影。对用户来说,尤其是热衷于Meme币交易的用户,与其参与一个包装完美,份额稀少但最终结果可能并不理想的项目。可能不如直接无脑押宝在一些大规律会归零,但有极小概率会暴富的机会。
此前的Meme币,每天在链上发行的数量成千上万,几乎都没有背书,全靠用户自己的捕猎嗅觉。因此,这一轮的预售Meme,对于这些用户来说,反而是增加了信任基础(好歹是有一些KOL在背书),哪怕遭遇跑路,仍有对象可寻。根本上,是用户用小量资金,与KOL们的影响力做的一次对赌。这看起来更像是一次对那些费劲心力包装自己的项目方的嘲讽。
这是否意味着这类简单粗暴的Meme币对于用户来说就是更好的选择?
答案可能是否定的。在此前PANews曾对Meme币的盈亏比概率做过详尽分析(扩展阅读:科学土狗和性价比篇)。
回归这一轮的预售币热潮,我们会发现,最终表现较好收益的以BOME、SLERF为代表在近9天(3月12日至3月21日)来Solana上发行的12,787个代币(dexscreener数据)中可谓是万里挑一。而这两个代币的发生,BOME是因为是首个掀起风潮的代币,SLERF则是因为创始人手滑销毁了代币。其上涨的逻辑本质上都是偶然事件,并且随着风潮冷却,几乎所有的预售代币都遭遇了大幅回调。除了早期投资者之外,后期进入的用户很难有盈利的空间。
参与预售类的Meme币,本质上属于一种极小概率的投机,是加密圈投机和FOMO情绪极致的演绎,而其回报率可能甚至不如买彩票。
一位用户发布了这样一条推特,引人深思。
“加密货币预售:
SOL在2020年筹集了200万美元
BNB在2017年筹集了1500万美元
以太坊在2014年筹集了1800万美元
2024年,一位随机的推特用户筹集了3200万美元”
经历10年之后,以太坊的市值已达到4300亿美元。而再过1个月,今天热闹的预售币可能便已无人问津。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

"Rented Conviction: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Is Real Money" The weekly inflows into Bitcoin ETFs are often interpreted as a gauge of institutional belief. However, a significant portion of this activity is driven by a hidden arbitrage trade, not directional conviction. The core mechanism is a cash-and-carry arbitrage: traders buy spot Bitcoin (often via ETFs) while simultaneously shorting CME futures to lock in the price difference, or "basis." This delta-neutral trade is essentially an interest rate play. In weekly data, about half the fluctuation in ETF flows can be explained by new short positions added by leveraged funds (hedge funds), with a correlation of 0.70. Bitcoin's price movement in a given week shows no statistical power in predicting these flows. While this arbitrage trade drives weekly *volatility*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows, the current net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The remainder is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week, which constitutes the vast majority of the accumulated "mountain" over two years. Thus, ETF flow data overstates the *volatility* of conviction, not its *level*. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for nearly two years. Leveraged fund short positions peaked at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and have since declined to ~$4.5 billion. When the basis compresses to unprofitable levels, ETF inflows and short positions retreat together. Recent outflows should not be mistaken for a loss of faith but rather the routine unwinding of this rate trade. For Ethereum ETFs, the pattern is weaker. Accounting for staking yield makes the basis often negative, so neither strong conviction buying nor robust arbitrage supports its flows. To interpret ETF flows correctly, monitor the CME basis versus T-bill rates and leveraged fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the next "demand" headline is real. The real, patient buy-and-hold demand is what constitutes the enduring bulk of ETF assets.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

South China Morning Post The leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix has surged over tenfold year-to-date, fueled by intense market speculation on the memory chip sector. By June 22, the value of the 'South Korea 2x Long SK Hynix ETF' listed in Hong Kong had skyrocketed by more than 1,061% since the start of the year, while its asset size exploded over twenty times from the end of last year. The rally is driven by AI-driven demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM), with SK Hynix recently sampling its next-generation HBM4E product. However, industry professionals warn of significant risks. Leveraged ETFs magnify both gains and losses. During a recent market correction, while the underlying SK Hynix stock fell 19.1%, its double-leveraged ETF dropped nearly 38%. Korean regulators noted that such products could theoretically lose 60% in a single day. Additionally, these ETFs face risks like time decay in volatile markets, liquidity spirals during mass redemptions, and extreme price dislocations from market-making failures, as seen in early June when an ETF moved opposite to its underlying stock. The trading is predominantly driven by retail investors, with institutional capital largely absent due to the products' high volatility. Analysts caution that with the semiconductor sector at elevated valuations and facing geopolitical and supply chain uncertainties, leveraged ETFs pose a substantial threat of amplified losses for uninformed investors.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

18 Months, Over 50x Surge: KIOXIA's Epic Comeback

KIOXIA, a NAND flash memory giant, staged a dramatic comeback driven by AI demand. After a period of significant losses, a failed merger, and missed HBM opportunities, its 2024 IPO began modestly. However, fueled by explosive demand for AI data storage, its stock price skyrocketed over 50 times within 18 months, making it Japan's most valuable company, surpassing Toyota. Its Q1 FY2026 profit guidance soared 30-fold year-over-year, with 2026 NAND capacity already sold out. Key to its success is its 3D NAND technology, BiCS FLASH. As the inventor of NAND, KIOXIA advanced its technology through generations, reaching over 200 layers by 2023. Key innovations include CBA (CMOS directly Bonded to Array), which separately manufactures control circuits and memory arrays for better performance, and OPS (On Pitch Select Gate) to increase density. The company is now developing high-capacity packages like an 8TB solution stacking 32 dies. Looking beyond NAND, KIOXIA is exploring 3D DRAM with its OCTRAM technology, using oxide semiconductor transistors for ultra-low leakage to reduce power consumption. This fundamental research differs from HBM and represents a long-term bet to extend its 3D expertise from NAND into future DRAM architectures. KIOXIA's story highlights how technological assets and shifting market cycles can rapidly transform a company's fortunes. While questions remain about sustaining growth beyond the current AI boom, its resurgence demonstrates that in semiconductors, being down does not necessarily mean being out.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

18 Months, Over 50x Surge: KIOXIA's Epic Comeback

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Market Trends in U.S. Stocks (June 23): Peak at Listing? SpaceX Loses Over $800 Billion in Three Days, Tech Stocks Experience Severe Internal Divergence

Stock Market Trends (June 23): Did SpaceX Peak at IPO? The company loses over $800 billion in market value in three days as a sharp divergence unfolds within the tech sector. SpaceX's post-IPO decline of over 20%, falling below its first-day close, reflects a swift market repricing. The catalyst is a clear shift in narrative from "AI platform potential" to concerns over rising capital costs, as its $8.57 billion IPO and subsequent $20 billion debt offering are earmarked for acquisitions and refinancing existing bridge loans rather than de-leveraging. While high-valuation tech stocks like Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft faced pressure, Micron surged nearly 7% to a record high following a strategic supply deal with Anthropic for HBM and memory, highlighting robust, tangible demand in AI infrastructure. The broader market saw funds rotate into more defensive industrial and financial names. Macro factors included a dip in oil prices to a three-month low on news of a US-Iran framework deal, though logistical hurdles for resuming full Strait of Hormuz shipments remain. Key events ahead include Nvidia's shareholder meeting, Micron's earnings, and the May PCE inflation data. The latter will be crucial in determining whether the sell-off in high-valuation growth stocks, which appears to have just begun, will persist.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Market Trends in U.S. Stocks (June 23): Peak at Listing? SpaceX Loses Over $800 Billion in Three Days, Tech Stocks Experience Severe Internal Divergence

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片