2026 Crypto Financing Reshuffle: Gaming and DePIN Are Dead, Two Prediction Market Deals Gobble Up 18% of Yearly Funding

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-09Actualizado a 2026-05-09

Resumen

Crypto Funding Shakeup in 2026: Gaming & DePIN Fade, Prediction Markets Dominate Analysis of crypto funding from January 1 to May 6, 2026, reveals a major sectoral shift. The industry raised $8.65 billion across 305 deals. However, a March surge to $4.57 billion was largely due to two mega-deals: BVNK's $1.8 billion acquisition and a $1 billion raise by Kalshi. Excluding these, monthly funding is a sluggish ~$1 billion. Capital concentration is extreme. The Payments ($3.74B) and Consumer ($2.48B) sectors absorbed 72% of all funds. Within Consumer, prediction markets were dominant: Kalshi's $1B and Polymarket's $600M raises together accounted for 18% of the year's total, surpassing all 47 DeFi deals combined ($1.06B). In contrast, Gaming and DePIN sectors saw funding nearly vanish. A strategic pivot is underway. Merger & Acquisition (M&A) activity reached 48 deals, nearly matching the 57 seed-stage rounds. This indicates capital is increasingly flowing toward acquiring established leaders rather than betting on new ideas. The most active investors so far in 2026 are Coinbase Ventures (18 deals), Tether (13 deals), Animoca Brands (11 deals), and GSR (11 deals). Notably, a16z's pace has slowed significantly compared to its 2021-2026 average.

Author: Memento Research

Compilation: TechFlow Deep Tides

Deep Tides Intro: Crypto financing data from the first four months of 2026 reveals a brutal reality: funding for the gaming and DePIN sectors has nearly dried up, while Kalshi and Polymarket, two prediction market companies, have taken more money than all DeFi projects combined for the entire year. More alarmingly, the number of M&A deals has caught up with seed rounds, indicating that capital is shifting from betting on new ideas to acquiring existing industry leaders.

Financing Overview: The March Surge Was Just an Illusion

From January 1 to May 6, 2026, the crypto industry completed 305 financing rounds, totaling $8.65 billion. However, the "surge" of $4.57 billion in March was essentially just two mega M&A deals: BVNK's $1.8 billion and Kalshi's $1 billion.

Excluding these two, the real financing pace is about $1 billion per month, which is even weaker than at the end of 2025.

Fund Flow: Payments and Consumer Gobble Up 72%

By sector:

Payments: $3.74 billion (56 deals)

Consumer: $2.48 billion (35 deals)

DeFi: $1.06 billion (47 deals, the highest number of transactions)

The payments and consumer sectors together account for 72% of the year's funding. Financing for gaming and DePIN has almost vanished.

Prediction Markets Dominate the Consumer Sector

The two prediction market companies accounted for 18% of the year's total funding:

Kalshi: $1 billion

Polymarket: $600 million

These two deals total $1.6 billion, exceeding the combined total of all 47 DeFi financing rounds.

M&A Becomes Mainstream

M&A deals reached 48 (23% of known-stage transactions), almost on par with 57 seed rounds (27%). This cycle has shifted from the early stage of investing in new ideas to acquiring industry leaders.

Investor Rankings Reshuffled

Most active funds in 2026:

Coinbase Ventures: 18 deals (Ranked 2nd during 2021-26)

Tether: 13 deals (New top lead investor)

Animoca Brands: 11 deals (Ranked 1st during 2021-26)

GSR: 11 deals

a16z: 7 deals (Significantly down from ~200 deals during 2021-26)

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat were the two major M&A deals that dominated the funding figures for March 2026, and what were their values?

AThe two major M&A deals were BVNK, which raised $1.8 billion, and Kalshi, which raised $1 billion.

QWhich two sectors accounted for 72% of total funding in early 2026, and what were the respective funding amounts?

AThe Payments and Consumer sectors accounted for 72% of total funding. Payments raised $3.74 billion across 56 deals, while Consumer raised $2.48 billion across 35 deals.

QHow much funding did the prediction market companies Kalshi and Polymarket receive collectively, and what percentage of the year's total funds does this represent?

AKalshi and Polymarket collectively received $1.6 billion in funding, which represents 18% of the total funds raised in early 2026.

QWhat significant trend is highlighted by the number of M&A transactions (48) nearly matching the number of seed rounds (57) in early 2026?

AThe trend highlights a market shift where capital is moving away from funding new ideas (seed-stage investments) and towards acquiring existing market leaders (M&A).

QAccording to the article, which were the most active investment funds in early 2026 by number of deals?

AThe most active funds were Coinbase Ventures with 18 deals, Tether with 13 deals, and Animoca Brands and GSR with 11 deals each.

Lecturas Relacionadas

BitMine Copies Saylor’s Strategy Playbook With Ethereum Preferred Stock Offering

BitMine Immersion Technologies is following a strategy similar to Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy, but for Ethereum. The company has filed for a public offering of 3 million shares of 9.50% Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock, with a stated value of $100 per share, to raise capital for expanding its Ethereum holdings and staking infrastructure. Proceeds are earmarked for acquiring ETH and other digital assets, expanding its "MAVAN" validator network, and other corporate purposes. The preferred stock will pay cumulative dividends at 9.50% annually and includes provisions for dividend penalties and company redemption options. BitMine has applied to list the shares on the NYSE under the ticker BMNP.

bitcoinistHace 4 min(s)

BitMine Copies Saylor’s Strategy Playbook With Ethereum Preferred Stock Offering

bitcoinistHace 4 min(s)

Is Cardano Over? Charles Hoskinson Warns Of A “Wave Of Failures” — And His Own Community Is Furious

Cardano co-founder Charles Hoskinson has issued a severe warning, predicting a "wave of failures," forced consolidation, and DeFi shutdowns across the Cardano ecosystem in the second half of 2026. His comments followed the sudden shutdown announcement of TapTools, a major analytics and infrastructure platform for Cardano, citing unsustainable costs. Hoskinson framed this not as an isolated incident but a sign of deeper ecosystem stress, acknowledging that a proposed treasury-funded index to support projects never materialized. He subsequently announced he was "taking a break." The crypto community reacted with strong criticism. Prominent figures accused Hoskinson of overselling Cardano's potential and failing to deliver on promises, leaving investors to suffer. The ecosystem faces significant challenges: Cardano's Total Value Locked (TVL) ranks only 28th, its 2026 summit was canceled, engineering funding was slashed, and ADA's price has fallen below $0.20 for the first time in over five years. Hoskinson's own bleak assessment raises fundamental questions about Cardano's ability to reverse its current trajectory.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Is Cardano Over? Charles Hoskinson Warns Of A “Wave Of Failures” — And His Own Community Is Furious

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

What To Expect For The Bitcoin Price By EOY 2026

A crypto analyst, Aralez, provides predictions for Bitcoin's price through the end of 2026. For the remaining Q2 2024, a bearish outlook is forecasted, with Bitcoin potentially dropping to around $58,000. The third quarter is expected to see Bitcoin enter a capitulation phase, followed by whale accumulation and a potential price bottom as the Federal Reserve eases interest rates. The final leg of the year is predicted to bring a major bullish surge, with Bitcoin potentially rising over 30% and targeting $100,000 by the end of 2026, driven by factors like the AI narrative and increased crypto market liquidity.

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

What To Expect For The Bitcoin Price By EOY 2026

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

Glassnode on Snowflake: Digital Asset Data Delivered Directly to your Warehouse

Glassnode has launched a data sharing environment on Snowflake, making comprehensive on-chain and market data directly accessible within institutional data warehouses. This eliminates the need for custom API pipelines and ETL management. The offering includes on-chain analytics, derivatives, spot & exchange data, ETF & corporate treasury metrics, with multiple time resolutions. A key feature is point-in-time (PiT) data to ensure historical accuracy and eliminate look-ahead bias in backtesting. Designed for quantitative trading, risk management, and macro research, the integration allows users to query data via SQL alongside other datasets. Access is provisioned through private Snowflake Marketplace listings.

insights.glassnodeHace 3 hora(s)

Glassnode on Snowflake: Digital Asset Data Delivered Directly to your Warehouse

insights.glassnodeHace 3 hora(s)

What Are Some Good Paths for Chinese Web3 Entrepreneurship? (Part 5)

This article explores pathways for Chinese Web3 teams to pivot toward AI, building on a previous discussion. It focuses on two specific team profiles: **Security & Risk Control Teams:** These teams, skilled in smart contract auditing, wallet security, and on-chain monitoring, can transition to providing **Agent behavior auditing and AI security governance**. As AI Agents automate tasks, access data, and trigger payments, enterprises will need solutions to monitor permissions, audit logs, control data access, and prevent anomalies—creating a strong B2B demand. **Application & Community-Focused Teams:** Instead of completely rebranding as AI companies, these teams should use AI to **enhance their existing products**. For example, research platforms can use AI to summarize information and identify signals; community tools can automate user support and analysis; and educational products can create personalized learning paths. The key is integrating AI to solve existing user pain points, like information overload or high operational costs. The article also advises against certain AI directions for Chinese Web3 teams, such as building general-purpose large language models (too resource-intensive), creating overly broad Agent platforms (hard to monetize), developing AI traders/automated yield products (high regulatory and risk sensitivity), or simply adding superficial AI features without genuine value. The core conclusion: Successful migration depends not on chasing AI hype, but on **identifying how a team's existing Web3 capabilities—be it in data, payments, security, or user operations—can address real needs in new AI application scenarios.**

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

What Are Some Good Paths for Chinese Web3 Entrepreneurship? (Part 5)

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros