SEC Objects to Terraform’s $166M Retainer of Law Firm Dentons: Reuters

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-02-28Actualizado a 2024-02-29

Resumen

Additionally, the SEC has said that Terraform should not be allowed to hire law firm Dentons or pay litigation costs for employees, the report said.

  • The U.S. SEC has objected to Terraform’s $166 million retainer of Law Firm Dentons.
  • The SEC alleges that the money was “siphoned” off into an “opaque slush fund for its lawyers,” which could have gone to investors and creditors.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised objections to a $166 million retainer payment to lawyers of Terraform, according to Reuters.

Additionally, the SEC has said that Terraform should not be allowed to hire law firm Dentons or pay litigation costs for employees, the report said.

The SEC has alleged that Terraform intended to avoid paying a future judgment in the SEC’s lawsuit, which is why it sent $166 million to Dentons.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, currently face a trial in the U.S. from the SEC regarding the collapse of TerraUSD. Terraform Labs filed a voluntary petition in Delaware for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January 2024 after the failed stablecoin TerraUSD and the LUNA token collapsed in May 2022, destroying billions of dollars in investor wealth.

The money was “siphoned” off into an “opaque slush fund for its lawyers,” which could have gone to investors and creditors seeking to be repaid in Terraform’s bankruptcy, the SEC said, according to the report.

Terraform Labs or Dentons did not immediately respond to CoinDesk’s request for comment.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.


Lecturas Relacionadas

Why do people like Luke still want to fork Bitcoin despite having no support? BIP-100 has already been declared a failure!

On August 8th, the Bitcoin network experienced a contentious fork triggered by BIP-110, despite the proposal having only 2.53% miner signaling support in the prior period. Led primarily by developer Luke Dashjr and based on his Bitcoin Knots implementation (not merged into Bitcoin Core), this User-Activated Soft Fork (UASF) aimed to impose strict new limits on non-financial data (like Ordinals inscriptions) within blocks to reduce long-term node costs. The fork activated at block height 961632, with BIP-110 nodes rejecting blocks without the required signaling. This created two chains: the dominant original chain continuing normally, and a low-hashrate BIP-110 chain which quickly fell behind. The core conflict is between those viewing block space as a fee market open to all data and those prioritizing Bitcoin as a monetary network, seeking to ban what they see as blockchain "spam." BIP-110's strategy relied on economic nodes (exchanges, wallets) adopting the new rules first, hoping to force miners to follow. However, this has not materialized. The BIP-110 chain now faces severe challenges: extremely slow block times potentially stretching over 1.9 years before its rules would even activate, a lack of broad economic support, and no automatic replay protection. For most users, Bitcoin's main chain operates unchanged. The immediate technical impact is limited to services running BIP-110 software, which now see a different blockchain. The event highlights ongoing ideological disputes within Bitcoin but, given its minimal support, is unlikely to alter the main network's trajectory.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Why do people like Luke still want to fork Bitcoin despite having no support? BIP-100 has already been declared a failure!

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Hardcore Research Report: After a Stunning Debut, A Frame-by-Frame Breakdown of Robinhood Chain's Revenue Potential

**Summary: The Revenue Potential of Robinhood Chain vs. Its Declining Core Crypto Business** A detailed analysis of Robinhood's crypto trajectory reveals a stark contrast: while the company's overall revenue hit a record high of $1.31B in Q2 2026, its crypto-specific business is in sharp decline. Crypto revenue fell 38% year-over-year to $100M, now constituting only 8% of total revenue. Retail crypto trading volume and the share of crypto in customer assets also dropped to multi-year lows. In this context, Robinhood Chain, the company's newly launched Layer 2 blockchain, represents a major strategic bet. Its launch was notably strong, generating $3.6M in Real Economic Value (REV) in July 2026, or 38% of all tracked L2 revenue that month—surpassing established networks like Polygon and Base. However, this early activity was heavily driven by meme coins (51% of spot volume), not the chain's stated focus on Real World Assets (RWAs), which accounted for only 5%. The report argues that Robinhood Chain's infrastructure-layer revenue alone is insufficient to meaningfully revive the crypto division. The entire L2 revenue market is structurally shrinking and too small. Robinhood's clearest monetization path lies at the application layer: 1. **USDG Stablecoin:** Robinhood's native stablecoin could generate significant interest income. At a current $333M supply (assuming a 3.5% yield), it represents ~$10.5M in annualized revenue. Scaling USDG to $1B+ would create a substantial, durable income stream. 2. **Application Distribution:** Robinhood's main app holds immense distribution value. Evidence suggests protocols like Morpho pay for integration, driving significant user deposits. In contrast, distribution via the standalone Robinhood Wallet has shown limited value so far. The known, quantifiable revenue streams from Robinhood Chain (chain REV, USDG interest, shared Lighter fees) total ~$54.8M annualized—only about 14% of Robinhood's annualized crypto revenue. The conclusion is that for Robinhood Chain to become a meaningful growth driver, Robinhood must successfully commercialize its application-layer advantages—primarily by scaling USDG and monetizing its main app's user reach—or use the chain as a funnel into its higher-value traditional products. Based on current data, the chain is not yet a significant contributor to company profits.

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

Hardcore Research Report: After a Stunning Debut, A Frame-by-Frame Breakdown of Robinhood Chain's Revenue Potential

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

Hardcore Research Report: After an Impressive Start, Analyzing Robinhood Chain's Revenue Potential Frame by Frame

Robinhood's crypto business is in steep decline, contributing only 8% of total revenue in Q2 2026 despite the company's overall record performance. Its new Layer 2 blockchain, Robinhood Chain, launched strongly in July, generating $3.6M in Real Economic Value (REV) and capturing 38% of all L2 network revenue that month. However, this early activity is heavily driven by speculative Meme coin trading (51% of spot volume), not the intended Real-World Asset (RWA) use case. While successful as a blockchain, the network's revenue alone is too small to meaningfully impact Robinhood's profits, with known revenue streams annualizing to about $54.8M—just 14% of the crypto segment's annualized revenue. For Robinhood Chain to revitalize the crypto business, Robinhood must monetize beyond infrastructure. The clearest path is scaling its native stablecoin, USDG, to generate interest income from its reserves. Another opportunity lies in commercializing its massive user distribution, particularly through its main app, as evidenced by the successful integration of Morpho. In contrast, distribution via the standalone Robinhood Wallet appears limited. Ultimately, Robinhood Chain may serve more as a user acquisition funnel for higher-value products rather than a major direct revenue line. To become a significant growth driver, Robinhood must successfully expand USDG or effectively monetize its main app's distribution power.

Odaily星球日报Hace 22 min(s)

Hardcore Research Report: After an Impressive Start, Analyzing Robinhood Chain's Revenue Potential Frame by Frame

Odaily星球日报Hace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片