一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-02-06Actualizado a 2024-02-06

Resumen

9个项目涵盖游戏、借贷、社交等应用领域。

原文作者：Aylo, 加密 KOL

原文编译：Felix, PANews

Avalanche 生态有很多可以尝试的应用程序和子网，而这些可能在 2024 年迅速发展。加密 KOL Aylo 盘点了 9 个可以在 Avalanche 生态上交互的未发币项目，并指出了可能获得空投的交互方式。

Struct Finance

Struct Finance 在 Avalanche C 链上推出，提供利息金库和“分档”机制，为 DeFi 用户提供固定/非固定收益产品。该机制将计息产品分为不同“档”，分别应用不同的策略。该协议刚刚获得了 100 万美元的 AVAX 激励。用户可以选择一个金库，获得固定或可变收益+积分(空投)。

一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

相关阅读：Avalanche 第三季度报告：领域合作多面开花，生态系统充满活力

Hubble Exchange

Hubble Exchange 是一个使用 USDC 作为 Gas 代币的订单簿 DEX。用户使用 LayerZero 只需点击一次即可将资产从 EVM 直接存入 Hubble。

一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

Hyperspace

Avalanche 链上的 NFT 表现得相当不错。用户在 NFT 平台 Hyperspace 上交易 NFT 可以赚取积分，目前正在举行 Season 3 活动，时间截至 2 月 3 日。积分将转化为 AVAX 奖励。

一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

相关阅读：接力 Solana？盘点 Avalanche 生态最新进展

Gunzilla Games

Gunzilla Games 是建立在 Avalanche 子网上的 AAA 游戏工作室。目前正在开发一款赛博朋克大逃杀 2.0 游戏《Off The Grid》(OTG)。2022 年 6 月，Gunzilla Games 完成 4600 万美元融资，Republic Capital 领投、Griffin Gaming Partners、Animoca Brands、Jump Crypto 等参投。

用户可以下载 Technocore 应用程序（测试手机游戏，Season 2 已上线）和应用程序商店中的 GUNZ 平台。

BloodLoop

BloodLoop 一款利用 Avalanche 子网与区块链集成的 5 v 5 英雄射击游戏。

用户可以购买他们的 NFT 系列：https://avax.hyperspace.xyz/collection/avax/semcapsules

完成任务：https://sesamelabs.xyz/bloodloop/

Spellborne

Spellborne（前身为 Defimons）刚刚筹集了一轮资金，其中包括 Animoca 等投资人）。Spellborne 是一款基于 Avalanche 子网构建的复古风格捕捉怪物的 MMORPG 游戏（大型多人在线角色扮演游戏）。

DeltaPrime

DeltaPrime 是一个部署在 Avalanche 上的借贷平台。用户可以存入和借出资金（贷款的最低抵押率为 20% )。借来的资金可用于投资集成协议。

一览Avalanche生态9个未发币项目

The Arena

去中心化社交协议 The Arena（原名 Stars Arena）值得再次尝试，该协议有了新的领导层，新任首席执行官为 Jason Desimone。该协议的 TVL 在上周翻了一番。用户可以通过参与该平台赚取积分。社交网络或将迎来第二波浪潮。

LEVR.bet

LEVR.bet 是 Avalanche 链上的杠杆体育博彩平台。用户在其网站上注册测试版即可参与并赚取空投。

Lecturas Relacionadas

XRP Reversal Setup Forms Around Harmonic Pattern And Key Support Zone

XRP is trading at a critical technical support zone, according to a June 20 TradingView analysis. This area combines multiple layers of confluence, including the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement level and the point of control for the current range. Such convergence can intensify the battle between buyers and sellers at this level. The analysis suggests this support could form the basis for a broader harmonic reversal pattern. While not a guarantee, such setups provide a structured framework for identifying potential trend changes, invalidation points, and price targets. For the reversal thesis to gain credibility, XRP needs a decisive bullish reaction from this zone—specifically, a sustained bounce with volume that reclaims nearby resistance, not just a brief wick. Failure to hold support or repeated tests of the area would weaken the bullish argument. The setup is notable but requires confirmation from market price action.

bitcoinistHace 19 min(s)

XRP Reversal Setup Forms Around Harmonic Pattern And Key Support Zone

bitcoinistHace 19 min(s)

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

SpaceX, AI, and XRP: Why the Next Wealth Transfer Might Be Different?

The article posits that the global economy is transitioning into a new phase of infrastructure investment. Capital, facing slowing traditional growth engines, is flowing towards emerging foundational systems. This includes space infrastructure (exemplified by SpaceX), AI computing power, satellite networks, data centers, and global payment systems. A key driver is a potential new commodity supercycle fueled by industrial demand from these sectors. Concurrently, the role of blockchain is evolving from speculative assets to a critical settlement layer for the future economy. Digital assets like XRP and XLM, focused on payments and interoperability, are highlighted as potential rails for cross-border settlement, tokenized assets, and machine-to-machine (AI Agent) transactions. The narrative connects figures like Ripple's Jed McCaleb to space ventures, suggesting convergence. The argument emphasizes a shift from speculative narratives to utility-driven value. As AI and space commerce generate new economic activity, and regulatory clarity improves, blockchain networks may underpin real-time value transfer. The conclusion urges investors to consider which networks will form the backbone of this integrated next-generation economic infrastructure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SpaceX, AI, and XRP: Why the Next Wealth Transfer Might Be Different?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros