星球日报 | Glassnode：比特币活跃实体数量下降；DecenTrader：减半前BTC或将横盘一个月（2月5日）

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-02-05Actualizado a 2024-02-05

Resumen

纳斯达克向比特币矿企Bit Brother发出退市通知，拟2月27日召开听证会。

头条

Glassnode：现货 ETF 获批后 BTC 活跃实体数量反降至 21.9 万周期低点

根据链上分析公司 Glassnode 数据显示，比特币现货 ETF 获批后，尽管近期比特币价格表现强劲，但市场却出现了一个与直觉相反的现象，即活跃实体的数量下降到了每天 21.9 万的周期低点（本周小幅反弹至 22.1 万个），意味着虽然比特币价格上涨，比特币用户的增长并没有跟上。分析认为，这主要是由于与序数和铭文相关的活动增加，许多参与者都在重复使用比特币地址，从而减少了"活跃实体"的数量（不重复计算）。

DecenTrader：市场对“减半事件”做出反应前，BTC 或有一个月横向波动

加密交易策略工具 DecenTrader 预测了下一次 BTC“减半”的价格行为，认为在市场开始对即将到来的区块补贴减半做出反应之前，比特币价格或将经历大约一个月的横向波动。DecenTrader 首席执行官兼联合创始人 Filbfilb 表示，预计 4 月 18 日减半日期前两个月左右购买量将激增，接下来将是另一场“卖出新闻事件”，类似于上个月推出现货比特币 ETF 的市场反应，届时可能会将 BTC/USD 推升至目前的两年高点 49, 000 美元，然后 ETF 会出现跟风抛售。

纳斯达克向比特币矿企 Bit Brother 发出退市通知，拟 2 月 27 日召开听证会

纳斯达克上市矿企 Bit Brother Limited 披露已收到退市通知，据通知内容称，纳斯达克做出这一决定主要是因为该公司于 2023 年 10 月 25 日和 2023 年 12 月 5 日两次注册发行中带有无现金行权条款的某些认股权证所所引发的市场担忧，以及此类交易所引发的相关公共利益担忧。据悉，本次退市通知不会立即对 Bit Brother Limited 的上市和交易产生影响，目前纳斯达克已允许该公司在 2 月 27 日参加听证会进行说明，在听证程序完成之前，纳斯达克将继续搁置任何停牌或退市行动。

市场异动

加密货币总市值为 1.729 万亿美元，BTC 市占率为 48.8%

CoinGecko 数据显示，目前加密货币总市值为 1.729 万亿美元。此外，BTC 市占率为 48.8% ，ETH 市占率为 16% 。

全网 ETH 合约未平仓头寸降至 75.1 亿美元

Coinglass 数据显示，全网 ETH 期货合约未平仓头寸为 326 万枚 ETH，约合 75.1 亿美元， 24 H 降幅达 3.16% 。
其中币安 ETH 合约未平仓头寸为 113 万枚 ETH（约合 26.1 亿美元），排名第一。

自 1 月 10 日以来加拿大 Purpose 比特币 ETF 的 BTC 持有量减少 3000 枚

HOD L1 5 Capital 在 X 平台发文表示，看起来加拿大人正在从加拿大 Purpose 比特币 ETF 转向低费率的美国比特币现货 ETF。自 1 月 10 日以来，Purpose 比特币 ETF 持有的 BTC 数量减少 3000 枚。

Uniswap 前端交易费用达 519 万美元

DefiLlama 数据显示，截至 2 月 3 日，Uniswap 前端交易费用（收入）达 519 万美元。
此前消息，Uniswap Labs 宣布从 2023 年 10 月 17 日起对其 Web 应用程序和钱包中的某些代币收取 0.15% 的兑换（swap）费用，具体代币包括 ETH、USDC、WETH、USDT、DAI、WBTC、agEUR、GUSD、LUSD、EUROC、XSGD。

Arbitrum 链上已创建账户总数突破 1400 万个，活跃账户占比约 96%

据 Dune 数据显示，以太坊二层网络 Arbitrum 链上已创建账户总数突破 1400 万个，当前触及 1405.4 万个，其中活跃账户数约 1353 万，占比约为 96.2% 。此外，Arbitrum 链上交易总量达到约 5.15 亿笔，链上已创建合约数量超 423.3 万个。

行业要闻

内蒙古破获一起涉案 20 余亿元的虚拟货币平台传销案件，成功劝投两名外逃嫌疑人

内蒙古赤峰市元宝山区公安分局经侦大队破获一起虚拟货币平台传销案件，该平台具有利用虚拟币实施传销活动的犯罪嫌疑。
经查，该虚拟货币平台系立足北京面向全国、组织架构严密、犯罪手段新颖的传销团伙。截至案发，平台注册会员总数已达 1.8 万余人，涉及 13 个省市，交易流水 20 余亿元。
分局经侦大队在公安厅经侦总队和市局经侦支队的大力支持协助下，成功劝投两名在外潜逃的经济犯罪嫌疑人。目前相关案件正在进一步侦办中。

纽约时报：Satoshi Action Fund 正在通过法律来保护全美比特币用户权利

Satoshi Action Fund 创始人 Dennis Porter 在 X 平台发文表示：“据《纽约时报》报道，Satoshi Action Fund 正在通过法律来保护美国各地的比特币权利。《纽约时报》最近发表的一篇文章分享了我们去年通过的法律，并讨论了我们在印第安纳州、密苏里州、内布拉斯加州和弗吉尼亚州提出的 2024 年法案。
《纽约时报》报道了我们的‘挖矿权’立法在制止阿肯色州各地歧视方面的有效性。阿肯色州是全国第一个通过 Satoshi Action 模式政策的州。

项目要闻

Uniswap 创始人：UI 分叉有助于去中心化，而品牌分叉有损用户和品牌利益

Uniswap 创始人 Hayden Adams 在 X 平台发文表示：“Uniswap 界面是开源的，根据 Copyleft GPL 许可证开放。我们特意选择以开源方式构建，因为我们希望人们可以进行分叉（fork）。事实上，仅 GitHub 仓库就已经被分叉了约 4700 次。但是品牌与去中心化协议或开源界面有很大区别。Uniswap 品牌可以以多种方式使用，但在商标政策中有限制。例如：一个分叉项目可以说‘基于 Uniswap 协议构建’，但不能说‘由 Uniswap 团队构建’。我们的商标政策基于 Linux 和 Mozilla 的政策，并根植于开源最佳实践。”

Nobody NFT 地板价突破 0.9 ETH，交易量达 2500 ETH

据 OKX NFT 交易市场数据显示，今日下午开启交易的周星驰合作系列 NFT Nobody 地板突破 0.9 ETH，总交易量达 2500 ETH。该系列 NFT 初始发行价格为 0.19527 ETH。

ApeCoin 社区发起新提案拟决定是否构建 ApeChain

ApeCoin 社区已在 Snapshot 上发起新提案，以决定是否继续执行构建 ApeChain，该提案目的是选择一个支持者来建立一个专属 ApeCoin 区块链“ApeChain”，旨在扩展 APE 并支持 ApeCoin 生态系统增长。据悉，新提案将于 2 月 8 日投票结束，当前赞成率为 93.66% 。

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 9 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 9 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 13 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 13 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros