UK Supreme Court Refuses Craig Wright Appeal

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-01-25Actualizado a 2024-01-26

Resumen

In July a panel of judges ruled that Wright was only entitled to just 1 GBP in compensation for a libel claim against bitcoin podcaster Peter McCormack.

The U.K. Supreme Court denied Craig Wright permission to appeal a ruling in his case against Peter McCormack, a lawyer told CoinDesk on Thursday.

In July a panel of judges ruled that Wright was only entitled to 1 GBP in compensation for a libel claim against bitcoin podcaster Peter McCormack, regarding Wright’s claim to be Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto.

"We actually only just found out about it but it was at the end of end of last year, [the] Supreme Court refused permission for Craig Wright's appeal," said Rupert Cowper-Coles, a partner at law firm RPC who represents McCormack. "So they're very pleased that judgment stands - [the] one pound nominal damages award, which Craig has tried to appeal twice unsuccessfully."

Advertisement
Advertisement

CoinDesk reached out to Craig Wright's lawyers with the firm Shoosmiths, McCormack and the Supreme Court but did not hear back before press time.

Wright's latest loss comes amid a boiling point in another legal battle he is waging against a coterie of crypto companies and several bitcoin developers.

The group on Thursday rejected an offer to settle a years-long case alleging that it had violated Wright's alleged copyright to Bitcoin's white paper, blockchain database and file format by accessing the bitcoin network and its databases for their work.

"Hard pass on that 'settlement,'" the non-profit Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance (COPA) tweeted. "The settlement offer isn't quite accurate either – it comes with loopholes that would allow him to sue people all over again."

COPA represents the 13 Bitcoin Core developers and companies such as Coinbase and Block named in Wright's original legal complaint from 2016.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ukraine Urged Not to Push Crypto Business Abroad

On August 13, Alexey Semenyuk, head of Ukraine's National Securities and Stock Market Commission, emphasized that regulating the crypto market must protect users while preserving the benefits for businesses operating legally in the country. He argued the key questions are where this business is legally based, pays taxes, and how Ukrainian users are protected. Citing Chainalysis's 2024-2025 data, Ukraine ranks high in global crypto adoption, with a 52% annual increase in received digital assets, reaching $206.3 billion. Semenyuk stated that legalization should allow Ukrainians to use authorized service providers and enable companies to operate domestically under clear rules for activities like buying, selling, exchanging, storing, and staking cryptocurrencies. He highlighted that users need to know who provides the service, if they are authorized, the rules they must follow, and where to seek redress. He also pointed to the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) as a strategic direction, aiming to merge virtual asset technologies with traditional finance for new investment products and capital-raising models. A separate challenge is the interaction between crypto companies and banks, which requires a legal market framework to resolve. Semenyuk stressed the need for a balanced approach: excessive softness risks users, while over-regulation could push businesses abroad. The goal is a regulated market where one can legally work, invest, and launch products while being protected. In September 2025, the Ukrainian parliament approved in its first reading a draft law "On Virtual Asset Markets" to define the status and taxation of crypto assets.

cryptonews.ruHace 35 min(s)

Ukraine Urged Not to Push Crypto Business Abroad

cryptonews.ruHace 35 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片