Australian Treasury to Question Regulator Over HyperVerse Crypto Scheme: Report

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-01-04Actualizado a 2024-01-05

Resumen

"It seemed pretty clear that there should have been concerns raised about… this operation,” Stephen Jones said.

Australia's Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services Stephen Jones has said he would be asking the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) why it didn't warn consumers about the HyperVerse crypto scheme like other nations did, according to the Guardian.

The United Kingdom, New Zealand, Canada, Germany and Hungary, among others, issued warnings about the scheme as early as 2021, the report said.

“This type of scheme works by convincing innocent people to invest their money into a product that might not exist, with the only source of income being money from new investors,” Jones reportedly said. "I simply don’t know why a warning wasn’t issued. It seemed pretty clear that there should have been concerns raised about… this operation.”

The HyperVerse crypto scheme resulted in thousands of people losing millions of dollars, according to an investigation by Guardian Australia last month. The scheme was run by an entity called HyperTech and was promoted and run by CEO Steven Reece Lewis who does not appear to exist.

The founders of HyperTech, Australian entrepreneur Sam Lee and his business partner Ryan Xu, also founded the collapsed Australian bitcoin company Blockchain Global which owes creditors $58m. The liquidators alerted ASIC about Lee and Xu for breaking the law but the regulator said it does not intend to take action at this time, the Guardian reported.

ASIC did not immediately respond to a CoinDesk request for comment. HyperTech could not be reached for comment.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Recommended for you:

Edited by Oliver Knight.

Lecturas Relacionadas

After a Three-Year Hiatus, Peking University Alumna Lilian Weng's Latest Long-Form Article Goes Viral

After a three-year hiatus, OpenAI alum and renowned AI researcher Lilian Weng has published a comprehensive blog post analyzing the "Scaling Laws" that have guided multi-billion dollar investments in large language models. Her post, "Scaling Laws, Carefully," reveals these foundational laws to be more fragile than widely assumed. She dissects a key discrepancy between OpenAI's 2020 conclusion (favoring larger models) and DeepMind's 2022 Chinchilla finding (advocating balanced growth of model size and data), tracing it to differences in parameter counting and experimental scale. Furthermore, Weng highlights a critical methodological bug in the influential Chinchilla paper, discovered in 2024, where a loss function averaging error caused premature optimizer termination. The analysis also underscores a fundamental limitation: the laws assume infinite, unique training data, a premise collapsing as high-quality text data is exhausted by 2026-2028. This scarcity is driving the industry toward alternatives like reinforcement learning, test-time computation, and synthetic data. Weng concludes that the future of AI depends not just on more compute, but on rigorously understanding and refining these scaling principles.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

After a Three-Year Hiatus, Peking University Alumna Lilian Weng's Latest Long-Form Article Goes Viral

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Stablecoins Becoming the Next Policy Challenge for the Fed's Walsh Version

Fed Governor Christopher Waller's speech at the June 22 conference on the U.S. dollar's international role signifies a notable policy shift: stablecoins like USDT and USDC are now being formally considered as potential channels for transmitting U.S. dollar liquidity globally. With their combined market cap surpassing $250 billion and high transaction volumes, these digital assets are moving from the periphery of crypto policy to the core of monetary system research. The key concern for policymakers is how stablecoin flows interact with traditional dollar infrastructure. Their growth could affect bank deposits, demand for short-term Treasury securities (like T-bills), and global access to dollars, depending on whether demand originates overseas or substitutes for domestic bank balances. Issuers' reserve management—holding assets in banks, money market funds, or Treasuries—links stablecoin activity directly to these core markets. The Fed's research agenda now examines whether stablecoins, by combining payment and balance-holding functions on digital rails, could complicate monetary policy implementation or transmit liquidity stress to banks. While current Treasury holdings by issuers are under 1% of the total market, their concentrated demand could marginally impact yields, especially during periods of stress. Consequently, stablecoins are evolving from mere crypto trading tools into a private-layer dollar transmission system with public policy implications, prompting closer regulatory scrutiny of their reserve robustness, redemption mechanisms, and systemic integration.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Stablecoins Becoming the Next Policy Challenge for the Fed's Walsh Version

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

After Burning Through 900 Billion, Zuckerberg Decides to Open a Casino Where You Can't Gamble

Mark Zuckerberg's Meta is venting a new app called Arena, a prediction market platform where users use points instead of real money to bet on outcomes of elections, sports, and world events. This move follows Meta's massive $90 billion cumulative loss in its Reality Labs metaverse division. Critics argue the "play money" model undermines the core mechanism of prediction markets, where real financial stakes ensure accurate forecasts. Arena is seen as Meta's attempt to copy established, fast-growing platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi while avoiding regulatory hurdles. The article suggests this may be less about creating a genuine prediction tool and more about social engagement, potentially acting as a gateway that introduces billions to the concept, from which licensed platforms could ultimately benefit.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

After Burning Through 900 Billion, Zuckerberg Decides to Open a Casino Where You Can't Gamble

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

A 380% Soar, Shenzhen’s 100-Billion-Yuan IPO Rings the Bell

HKC Holdings, a major Chinese display panel manufacturer, has successfully listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's main board. The company's shares surged over 380% on its debut, pushing its market capitalization to around 350 billion yuan (formerly reaching 500 billion yuan). Founded by Wang Zhiyong in Shenzhen's Huaqiangbei electronics market nearly three decades ago, HKC evolved from assembling monitors to becoming a global top-tier supplier of semiconductor display panels for TVs, monitors, and smartphones. The IPO marks a significant milestone for HKC and its backers. The company's growth into the capital-intensive panel manufacturing sector was supported through partnerships with state-owned capital from regions like Chongqing, Mianyang, and Chuzhou. Its shareholder list also includes BOE Technology's investment arm. In recent years, HKC reported strong financials, with core panel business contributing over 70% of revenue and clients including Samsung, TCL, and Xiaomi. This listing is seen as part of a broader trend in Shenzhen's evolving tech landscape. Beyond established giants, the city is nurturing clusters of leading companies in specialized sectors like robotics—exemplified by the "Shenzhen Robot Valley"—and storage chips, where a group of firms dubbed the "Storage Five Tigers" has achieved a combined trillion-yuan market valuation. Shenzhen's strategic focus on emerging industries such as AI terminals, low-altitude economy, and humanoid robotics aims to build new industrial depth and foster the next generation of tech champions.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

A 380% Soar, Shenzhen’s 100-Billion-Yuan IPO Rings the Bell

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Lasting 233 Days with Over 50% Drawdown, Is This the Mildest Bear Market to Date?

Bitcoin's current bear market has lasted 233 days as of June 24, making it the fourth-longest cycle since 2014, defined by its price staying below the 200-day moving average (200 DMA) for over 30 days. Historically, the longest bear markets were in 2018-2019 (385 days) and 2022-2023 (381 days), driven by major structural crashes post-all-time highs. In contrast, the current 2025-2026 downturn, following Bitcoin's January 2025 peak of $124,773, appears driven by broader macro shifts like rising interest rates and fading post-halving momentum. This cycle is notably the mildest on record so far, with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 51.2%. Previous major bear markets saw declines between 76.7% and 83.6%. Even the sharp but brief 2020 COVID crash caused a 74.4% drop. As of the analysis date, Bitcoin's price is $62,651, about 22% below its 200 DMA of $76,450. A sustained rally of over one-fifth is needed to reclaim this key level. If the recent low of $60,861 on June 7, 2026, is confirmed as the cycle bottom, historical recovery patterns suggest reclaiming the 200 DMA could take from 65 to 166 days, potentially placing it around August 2026 at the earliest.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Lasting 233 Days with Over 50% Drawdown, Is This the Mildest Bear Market to Date?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros