比特币风投实验室SATX Labs宣布启动一期基金:共同推动比特币生态创新

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2024-01-04Actualizado a 2024-01-04

Resumen

欢迎比特币生态创业者和有长期合作意向的投资人加入。

比特币风投实验室SATX Labs宣布启动一期基金:共同推动比特币生态创新

自 2009 年 1 月 3 日创世区块诞生以来, 15 年间比特币在加密行业中一直占据着主导地位,其最大的优势是围绕比特币诞生了一整套鼓励创新包容且开放的行业产业链。

从底层运行全节点的矿场,到比特币背后云集的全球顶级风投机构,再到比特币上层汇聚了全球最有创造力的开放金融团队和人才,为什么在 15 年前在创世区块里永久记录下当天的《泰晤士报》头版标题“The Times 03/JAN/2009 ,Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks”的比特币能成为世界前十大资产,其衍生的如以太坊等加密货币能真正获得传统金融界的高度关注?

随着 2021 年 5 月 19 日矿场算力大清退,美国开始在各方面加速吸纳比特币相关资源, 21 年加密货币交易所 Coinbase 在纳斯达克挂牌上市;同年 10 月底美国 SEC 通过了比特币期货 ETF。毕业于顶尖高校 HYPSM 的高材生越来越多地涌入到加密行业,顶级资本在投资北美领先的加密企业,顶级项目在全球市场一步步蚕食比特币市场份额……目前比特币的发展有些停滞不前,链上无法吸纳超大体量资金,随着价格增加区块拥堵导致生态交易量小,交易磨损大,比特币生态的开发时不我待,未来将是比特币与各个公链的常态化竞争。

更严峻的问题是,如果一位比特币生态创业者,尤其是华人创业者,希望为浮躁的行业带来一些真正的技术革新的创业者,他可能遇到的问题包括但不限于:投资机构更青睐新兴公链及其链上项目因为可以讲出更吸引资本的故事,比特币的故事对于资本和 LP 来说有些老套,海外资源有限招人获客难度累加,没有任何可以得到的“政策支持”。这对于在海外创业的华人创业者来说更是难上加难。

有多少投资机构和投资人敢投且能投怀揣原教旨比特币最大主义的创业者?首先,出海的华人创业者很难获得北美的资源支持,如果连拥有完整比特币上下游产业链的华人投资机构和投资者也不支持,那么华人在比特币生态的话语权将很难在与新兴公链各大资本的博弈中脱颖而出。

目前在比特币上诞生的项目多属于对以太坊已采用技术的模仿抄袭,而模仿抄袭永远只能追赶,科技和技术创新才有机会超越,科技创新的根源是企业家和人才,华人创业者在比特币生态中有得天独厚的优势。甚至未来一个比特币项目需要有华人企业家作为核心才有机会让比特币生态迸发生机与活力。

在比特币正式运行 15 年后及第四次减半来临之际,SATX Labs 正式启动,诚邀项目创始人、算力从业者、比特币社区、媒体代表、开发者社区以及其他对比特币生态持积极态度的个人作为合作伙伴加入

目前,SATX Labs 一期基金的出资人包括头部顶级美元基金、北美上市公司、头部算力企业、比特币 OG 等行业上游机构及个人。基金的战略重心为比特币二层协议及生态资产投资,以保证比特币主网安全性,建设更加繁荣的比特币二层生态系统。

创业项目加入 SATX Labs 将获得:

顶级风投资金支持:SATX Labs 将设立一支比特币生态专项基金,为项目提供早期融资,加速项目发展。

全方位的创新和技术服务:SATX Labs 将为合格项目提供一站式支持,帮助项目完成从 0 至 1 的产品研发,加速项目发展。

定期邀请行业专家:SATX Labs 拟定期邀请包括比特币核心开发者、项目创始人和来自投资机构的合作伙伴在内的行业专家进行闭门讨论,提供专业指导,加速项目发展。

与比特币生态 OG 建立合作:合格项目将有机会与比特币生态 OG 建立合作,帮助项目团队找到合适的合作伙伴和开发者,搭建有活力的团队。

同时,SATX Labs 欢迎有长期合作意向的投资人的加入。

作为未来计划中的一部分,SATX Labs 每年将组织两期基金,为新项目提供加速和孵化支持,并举办沉浸式创业 Hacker House 活动,帮助创始人解决现实商业挑战。此外,参与 SATX Labs 活动系列的参与者将从各类投资机构、项目创始人、加密社区、大学区块链俱乐部、全球 KOL 和开发者社区获得大量支持,所有这些都将有助于项目的更好推广和曝光以及共同推动比特币生态的发展。

同时作为一家聚焦比特币生态早期项目发掘和投资的实验室,SATX Labs 始终坚信比特币生态是未来 15 年内最有可能改变世界的产业之一,诚邀来自世界各地的比特币生态建设者加入并共同建设比特币生态的未来,为比特币生态的繁荣共同贡献力量。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Polymarket's Sixth Anniversary: Bathroom, Exile, and Homecoming

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, recently celebrated its sixth anniversary. Born during New York's COVID-19 lockdown, founder Shayne Coplan built the initial product from his bathroom. The platform allows users to trade on the outcomes of real-world events, aiming to aggregate information faster than traditional media or polls. Its early years involved navigating regulatory challenges, most notably a 2022 CFTC order and penalty for offering unregistered event contracts, which led to a ban on U.S. users. Despite this "exile," the platform persisted, gaining significant traction during major news events like the 2024 U.S. presidential election, where its markets often preceded mainstream narratives. A pivotal shift occurred in 2025. Following the conclusion of a DOJ/CFTC investigation, Polymarket strategically acquired a CFTC-regulated exchange (QCX) to re-enter the U.S. market legally. It secured a massive strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), NYSE's parent company, and formed high-profile partnerships with sports leagues like the NHL, UFC, and MLB, as well as media outlets including Google and the Wall Street Journal. Now valued in the tens of billions, Polymarket stands at the intersection of crypto, finance, media, and sports. Its journey reflects a constant tension between innovative information aggregation and regulatory scrutiny, evolving from a fringe crypto experiment into a mainstream, albeit still contested, financial and data infrastructure.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Polymarket's Sixth Anniversary: Bathroom, Exile, and Homecoming

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

The 'Side Hustle Survival' of DAT Companies: After the Accumulation Flywheel Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue

"Metaplanet's 'Side Hustle Survival': After the 'Crypto Hoarding Flywheel' Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue" The article discusses the strategic pivot of Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies as the once-lucrative model of hoarding cryptocurrencies, pioneered by MicroStrategy, faces challenges. With the crypto bear market and the rise of ETFs offering direct, low-premium exposure, many DAT firms are abandoning the passive treasury model. Prominent examples include ETHZilla, which sold ETH to repay debt and shifted to RWA tokenization, and others like Prenetics Global exiting completely. Facing stalled growth, remaining companies are pursuing two main survival paths. The first path is transforming into institutional crypto asset management platforms and yield funds. SharpLink Gaming exemplifies this by staking 100% of its ETH and partnering with Galaxy Digital to launch a yield fund. GameSquare is taking a more aggressive approach, using AI-driven algorithms across DeFi protocols to seek higher returns. The second path involves becoming blockchain infrastructure operators, particularly in the Solana ecosystem. Companies like DeFi Development and SOL Strategies are moving beyond holding SOL to operating validator networks and launching liquid staking tokens, building fee-based revenue models from ecosystem participation. The article notes these transitions reflect a broader industry maturation, shifting from financial engineering to building operational moats through technology, network effects, and deep ecosystem integration. However, risks remain, including DeFi protocol vulnerabilities and dependence on specific blockchain networks' health. Ultimately, this collective shift signals that in crypto, sustainable value comes not from capital games but from active participation, cash flow generation, and providing real utility—a necessary, if painful, step towards industry maturity.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

The 'Side Hustle Survival' of DAT Companies: After the Accumulation Flywheel Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Annual Revenue of 13 Billion, Paying 17.2 Billion to Microsoft: The Truth Behind AI's Money-Burning in OpenAI's Leaked Ledger

Leaked OpenAI financial documents from June 2026 revealed that in 2025, the company achieved $13.07 billion in revenue, a 253% growth from 2024. However, this was accompanied by an operational loss of $20.92 billion and a net loss of roughly $8 billion. Despite ChatGPT surpassing 900 million weekly active users, the "burn rate" remained high: for every $1 earned, $1.60 was spent. The cost structure shows $34 billion in total costs. R&D was the largest expense at $19.18 billion, which included $10.59 billion paid to Microsoft. Compute costs for model inference were $7.5 billion, with sales and marketing at $5.73 billion. Notably, total payments to Microsoft reached $17.2 billion, accounting for over 50% of OpenAI's total costs and exceeding its annual revenue, highlighting a significant structural burden. This high-cost, high-loss model is an industry-wide trend. xAI reported a 2025 operational loss of $6.4 billion against $3.2 billion in revenue, spending $3 for every $1 earned. Anthropic, with a reported $90 billion annualized revenue by late 2025, also faced pressure with a 40% gross margin, lower than expected due to high inference costs. Combined, these top three firms' operational losses surpassed $30 billion in 2025. OpenAI's vast user base presents a monetization challenge. With only about 50 million of its 900 million weekly users paying (a ~5.6% conversion rate), the compute cost of serving free users is substantial. This contrasts with strategies like Anthropic's, which focuses on premium pricing for enterprise clients. The industry's path to profitability hinges on dramatically reducing marginal costs, particularly for inference, through innovations in specialized chips or model efficiency. Until then, massive capital inflows—like OpenAI's $122 billion funding round in March 2026—remain essential to fund the relentless pursuit of scale and advanced capabilities.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Annual Revenue of 13 Billion, Paying 17.2 Billion to Microsoft: The Truth Behind AI's Money-Burning in OpenAI's Leaked Ledger

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片