SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2023-12-20Actualizado a 2023-12-20

Resumen

BTC价格在昨天收盘后小幅回落至42000美元,而后逐渐收复几乎全部失地,接近平收(-0.3%)。期权方面,BTC/ETH两者的前端隐含波动率再度下调,后端微涨,曲线整体走陡。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

昨日(19 Dec),拥有明年 FOMC 货币投票权的里士满联储主席巴尔金发表言论,指出美联储在降低通胀方面取得了良好进展,但在开始降息之前希望看到更加一致的数据;芝加哥联储主席古尔斯比同样发表讲话称,美联储尚未承诺降息,并指出市场当前的反应有些超前。尽管美联储官员接连为降息预期泼冷水,美债收益率仍在下跌,其中十年期收益率下破 3.9% 关口报 3.891% ,两年期收益率报 4.386% 。美三大股指集体收涨,道琼斯指数创下收盘的历史新高,收报 37557.92 点(+ 0.68% ),标普和纳指分别收涨 0.59% /0 。66% 。日圆方面,日本央行决议维持基准利率与 YCC 不变,行长植田和男在发布会上表示,下次会议加息的可能性很低,目前很难确定退出负利率政策的计划。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

Source: SignalPlus, Economic Calendar

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

Source: Binance & TradingView

数字货币方面,BTC 价格在昨天收盘后小幅回落至 42000 美元,而后逐渐收复几乎全部失地,接近平收(-0.3% )。期权方面,BTC/ETH 两者的前端隐含波动率再度下调,后端微涨,曲线整体走陡,且受到市场对一月初 SEC 可能批准 BTC ETF 的决策影响,BTC 的 ATM Vol 在 12 Jan 24 上维持了期限局部高点。交易方面,BTC 12 月到期的平值看涨期权遭到大量抛售,同时 12 Jan 和 26 Jan Wing 上的 Call 持续得到买入,部分解释了今天 IV Curve 走陡的现象;ETH 5 Jan 上单腿接近 10000 ETH 的 1950 vs 2100 Long Put Spread 成交吸引了市场注意,为年初价格可能的下行波动做出保护。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

Source: Deribit (截至 20 DEC 16: 00 UTC+ 8)(As of 20 DEC 08: 00 UTC)

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

Source: SignalPlus

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231220):波动率曲线走陡,BTC 12Jan维持局部高点

您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ,获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:xdengalin)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website:https://www.signalplus.com

Lecturas Relacionadas

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinistHace 5 hora(s)

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinistHace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片