跨链、ZK、NFT金融……一季度加密VC都把钱投向了哪里?

深潮TechFlowPublicado a 2022-04-29Actualizado a 2022-04-29

Resumen

头部风险投资公司青睐期权和ZK。

在Alameda、Zhusu、Hashed和DCG发起的公链战争之后,尽管市场情绪日益消极,但加密货币风险投资公司继续在不同领域积极扩张,这些钱到底流向了何处?

DeFi

TL;DR

  • 1.22年第1季度,加密货币风险投资公司投资140亿美元,相当于2021年总投资资本的50%。
  • 2.交易所主要投资于跨链项目与NFTFi
  • 3.头部风险投资公司青睐期权和ZK
  • 4.不可否认的是,交易所与头部VC都对DAO和游戏有着浓厚的兴趣

加密货币领域中的VC主要分为交易所的风险投资部门和(顶级)风险投资公司两种类型,类型不同,自然策略不同。

DeFi

我们首先来看看交易所风投部门执行的策略。

DeFi

其中 31 个 DeFi 项目中有 5 个是跨链项目(16%),16 个 NFT 项目中有 6 个是 NFT 金融化项目。(38%)
跨链
目前,关注度最多的跨链桥有:
LayerZero_Labs($STG), MultichainOrg($MULTI), SwimProtocol($SWIM), 和Routerprotocol($ROUTE), Symbiosis_fi($SIS)
其中除了$SIS,它们都从不同VC手中筹集了资金,尤其是$STG的VC投资者,多得令人眼花缭乱。
VC们不仅仅只是聪明钱,他们也是叙事的创造者。2021-2022年期间,SBF、Zhusu、Simon Seojoon Kim和BarrySilbert分别选择了$SOL、$AVAX、$LUNA、$NEAR,紧接着就是公链战争。2022年,尽管跨链桥经常被黑,但跨链仍是VC最热门的主题。

DeFi

NFT的价格发现
这应该是一个NFT金融化的主题,当我们只交易 NFT 本身时,实时价格发现是无关紧要,但是,如果 NFT 与 DeFi 结合,那就很重要了。
想象一下,一个BAYC的抵押贷款。假设BAYC的实际价格是100ETH,BAYC每小时交易一次。
如果BAYC被恶意攻击者以1ETH的价格卖出,许多BAYC持有者以自己的BAYC抵押贷款,大量的资金可能会被清算,这就是为什么价格发现很重要。
我们再来看一看顶级VC们投资的领域。

DeFi

其中,34 个 DeFi 项目中有 4 个是期权类项目 (12%) ,投资的40 个基础设施中有 8 个隐私类和扩展类项目 (20%)。
DeFi期权
为什么期权很重要?因为这是 DeFi 中的主动收益,并且与 TradFi 中的现货市场相比,衍生品市场更大。
正常的DeFi协议使用他们自己的治理代币提供收益,而代币是由协议铸造的。然而,期权协议提供的收益是由有机机制产生的,所以它的可持续性要强得多。
在股票市场,2021年的每日期权量(4.5亿美元)超过了每日现货量(4.05亿美元)。在加密货币中,币安每日衍生品交易量(560亿美元)超过了每日现货交易量(180亿美元)。链上期权市场是加密货币中服务最欠缺的市场之一。

DeFi

零知识证明(ZK)
几乎所有基础设施项目都试图让区块链变得更加私密和扩展性更强,为此,ZK 是必要的,zkEVM 解决方案即将到来,这是一种现象级的技术突破,自然获得了头部VC们的青睐。
相同点
不管是交易所的风投部门,还是顶级的风险投资公司,他们都不约而同地关注了DAO与游戏。
DAO治理工具:Nftychat(需要使用小狐狸钱包登录的Discord)+ENS=最直观的DAO治理工具。对于真正的DAO,我们需要一个Web3原生的社交平台。

DeFi

游戏:MaviaGame最受关注的游戏项目之一,它已经从Alameda、Binance Labs和Mechanism capital等地方融资了800万美元,并已成功完成了土地出售。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

Summary: This article examines the significant losses recently suffered by cryptocurrency traders and influencers who ventured into the stock market, specifically by heavily investing in AI-related and semiconductor storage stocks. The narrative centers on the dramatic reversal in the Korean and US equity markets in late July, with stocks like SK Hynix and related leveraged ETFs experiencing historic plunges, erasing massive gains. The analysis highlights several key factors behind the "flip." Traders, accustomed to crypto's high volatility and frustrated by a stagnant market, chased the apparent momentum in AI-themed equities. Many made fatal mistakes: applying high-leverage strategies common in crypto (e.g., 2x ETFs, on-chain perpetual contracts) to stocks, and failing to understand the distinct rules of different stock markets (like Korean pre-market trading). This led to widespread liquidations, especially when a thin Korean pre-market trade triggered a cascading flash crash on a decentralized exchange. Post-crash reflections from prominent figures reveal deep regret and self-criticism. They acknowledge misjudging their expertise, overestimating their edge against sophisticated institutional players, and the dangers of leverage. The article concludes that while such setbacks are part of trading, surviving long-term requires recognizing one's limitations and the inherent risks of cross-market strategies.

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

The U.S. Senate has taken a key step regarding the CLARITY Act, which could shape the future of the U.S. crypto market. On July 29, Senators Tom Tillis and Ruben Gallego finalized amendments to the bill's "conflict of interest" rules, one of its most contentious aspects. The bipartisan bill aims to tighten restrictions on high-level federal officials' ties to digital assets. The new text, crafted as an alternative to a White House-endorsed ethics code, is expected to impose stricter rules limiting officials' ability to issue or directly participate in digital asset projects. However, with Congress entering an August recess and the revised text not yet reviewed by much of the Senate, the bill's timeline is uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated a procedural vote could occur between July 29 and August 1 but expressed doubt the full bill could pass before the break. The House-approved CLARITY Act, passed in July 2025, has been under Senate negotiation for over a year. Key goals of the CLARITY Act include clarifying jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, setting rules for digital commodity spot markets, and addressing topics like stablecoin yields, DeFi, and illicit financing. The stablecoin yield provisions could significantly impact U.S.-based DeFi protocols, exchanges, and issuers, affecting their global competitiveness. The outcome is being closely watched by both the U.S. and global digital asset markets.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has been added to Russia's list of terrorists and extremists by Rosfinmonitoring, as published on July 30. The entry includes his name and date of birth. The designation follows an announcement by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on July 29, which charged Durov with aiding terrorist activity. The FSB alleges that a Telegram dating bot named "DaiVinchik" was used to recruit 46 individuals for attacks on police and arson, orchestrated by Ukrainian special services. The FSB also accuses Telegram's administration of failing to remove channels and bots used by Ukrainian intelligence and extremist groups. Durov is reportedly subject to an international arrest warrant. Inclusion on the Rosfinmonitoring list leads to significant restrictions: the freezing of Durov's bank accounts and assets, severe limitations on financial transactions, and a ban on election participation, media interaction, and event organization. Transfers to his accounts may be considered terrorism financing. For ordinary Russian Telegram users, purchasing Telegram Premium is not classified as financing terrorism, according to an IT expert. General use of the messenger—messaging, managing channels—does not automatically make a user a participant in extremist activity. There has been no official decision to ban Telegram itself. It is noted that French authorities are also investigating Durov over allegations of inadequate measures against criminal activity on the platform and insufficient cooperation with law enforcement. Durov denies all charges.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片