JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon and Sen. Elizabeth Warren Team Up to Bash Crypto

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2023-12-05Actualizado a 2023-12-06

Resumen

The CEO of the powerful Wall Street bank would prefer canceling crypto, though JPMorgan is using intrinsically related blockchain technology to move billions.

  • Even as Jamie Dimon's JPMorgan Chase has taken a prominent role among traditional financial firms in using blockchain, the CEO still says he loathes crypto.
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren built on the remarks from Dimon – usually an adversary – to call for more controls on industry transactions.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has never been shy about trashing crypto, even while his giant Wall Street bank became a leader in using blockchain technology to move billions. At a U.S. Senate hearing Wednesday, he slammed the industry again, to the delight of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who is trying to impose restrictions to combat illicit digital transactions.

7.7K

"I've always been deeply opposed to bitcoin, crypto, etc.," he told senators in a hearing examining the U.S. banking industry. "If I was the government, I'd close it down," he declared.

Lined up with other big-bank CEOs before the Senate Banking Committee, Dimon argued that the crypto industry gets to "move money instantaneously" without going through the regulatory conduits required by bankers, including sanctions and money-laundering controls. He contended that the primary use case for digital assets is criminality.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sen. Warren jumped in to get Dimon – a longtime adversary of the progressive Wall Street critic – and other CEOs to agree with her that crypto businesses should have to follow the same anti-money-laundering rules under the Bank Secrecy Act that other regulated financial firms do. That's the main thrust of legislation she's been pushing, which industry lobbyists have countered would rope in crypto projects that have no ability to comply, effectively killing them off.

The bill has some overlap in other crypto legislative efforts, but an aggressive effort to impose such restrictions probably won't find sufficient backing in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, so it isn't likely to move toward law in the near term.

Meanwhile, Dimon's bank – which has over $3 trillion of assets, more than double the market cap of all crypto assets combined – is a major player in Wall Street's race to move their businesses onto crypto-powered infrastructure. The company just said its JPM Coin is conveying $1 billion per day, and JPMorgan's Onyx division is exploring how to meld traditional finance with blockchains.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Dimon has long differentiated between "crypto" and "blockchain," the ledger technology that serves as the foundation for cryptocurrencies and something Dimon argues is a useful tool.

Edited by Nick Baker.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Battle for Control of the Tracks Enters the Second Half: Banks vs. Crypto, Who Will Have the Last Laugh?

The competition for control over the tokenization infrastructure, or the "rails," is intensifying, moving beyond initial asset listing to dominance over settlement, custody, and regulatory layers. Recent developments signal a shift in power towards traditional finance. Key evidence includes: the formation of the BankChain Alliance by 39 U.S. state banking associations to launch a banking-owned blockchain network; moves by market infrastructure giants like DTCC, ICE, and Citadel Securities to establish their own institutional-grade on-chain systems; the struggle of crypto-native custodians like ZeroHash (re-applying for a bank charter) and Copper (facing a severe valuation drop), highlighting that regulatory "license moats" are now more critical than technical advantages; and the launch of stablecoin USD1 by licensed trust bank BitGo on the permissioned Canton network, showing convergence of stablecoin issuance towards regulated entities. The analysis concludes this is not a simple "banks vs. crypto" battle but a redefinition of the foundational infrastructure. A clear division of labor is emerging: open public chains for DeFi and innovation, while bank-led consortium chains and licensed entities capture institutional settlement, tokenized deposits, and regulated custody. The defining question is no longer *if* an asset is tokenized, but *on which rails* it runs and *who controls* those rails, with regulation and牌照 providing the ultimate backstop.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

The Battle for Control of the Tracks Enters the Second Half: Banks vs. Crypto, Who Will Have the Last Laugh?

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

SEC Submits Proposal to White House for Revising Crypto Asset Custody Rules

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has submitted a proposal to the White House for revising rules governing the custody of crypto-assets by investment advisers and funds. Dated August 25, 2026, the proposal—known as Amendments to the Custody Rules (RIN 3235-AN46)—has entered review by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). The SEC aims to clarify the regulatory framework for crypto-asset custody and modernize certain requirements it deems outdated in light of market and technological evolution. The proposal, classified as economically significant and deregulatory under Executive Order 14192, seeks to alleviate industry burdens by removing redundant rules rather than imposing new ones. This initiative emerges amid Congressional delays in passing the comprehensive Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY). SEC Chair Paul Atkins previously indicated the agency would proceed with its own rules if CLARITY stalled. The SEC plans to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in October 2026, followed by a standard public comment period. The move marks a shift from the post-2008 Madoff scandal era, which spurred stricter custody rules, toward a more flexible approach for crypto markets. However, unresolved technical questions, such as the regulatory treatment of private key custody, remain. The proposal balances industry adaptability against potential risks, as reduced oversight could delay the detection of custody issues.

cryptonews.ruHace 21 min(s)

SEC Submits Proposal to White House for Revising Crypto Asset Custody Rules

cryptonews.ruHace 21 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片